Essay Abstract

In accordance with Dynamic Universe Model frequency shift happens on both the sides of spectrum when any electromagnetic radiation passes grazingly near gravitating mass. This will form the basis for continual Nucleosynthesis (continuous formation of elements) in our Universe. Here we will derive the results using general Physics and Mathematics that changes the frequency of electromagnetic radiation passing near a moving gravitating mass. The frequency of the radiation will increase (Red shifted) when the relative movement of the gravitating body is in opposite direction to EM radiation and the frequency will reduce when in same direction (Blue shifted). Amount of frequency shift will depend on relative velocity difference. This is a general debating paper discussing for understanding of the PREDICTED effect without much ado of mathematics of Dynamic Universe Model. Some questions asked by other physicists about this paper are included in the discussion section

Author Bio

Retired from Bhilai Steel plant in 2014. Working in astrophysics and cosmology as a hobby under guidance of maa Vak. Published 4 books in Germany Presented papers on Dynamic Universe Model in many countries.All the papers and books are available at http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/

Download Essay PDF File

Is this a paper on fundamentals? It starts with a lot of non-fundamental physics - mass, gravity, radiation...

12 days later

Hi Satyavarapu, I think the question and answer format you have employed makes a complex subject more approachable, by breaking into 'bite sized' pieces; good idea. I did not read the essay in its entirety but appreciate you are presenting a particular model- and creating matter might count as pretty fundamental. Georgina

    Thank you Georgina Woodward,

    Thank you for the blessings. Do you also have essay in this session? This frequency shifting near a gravitating mass is another prediction from Dynamic Universe Model, I am hoping some body will verify this prediction. You may also help me if it is not a big problem for you. Hope you will read full essay some other time and give out some more comments....

    Best

    =snp

    Hi Satyavarapu, yes I did notice your discussion of frequency shifting. I would like to read your essay again in more detail, but also want to take a look at the other essays. So it won't be straight away.

    As you ask, I have submitted an essay that is awaiting approval. Kind regards Georgina

    Hi Georgina Woodward,

    Thank you once again for the fast reply and also for saying that you will come back again and read this essay. I am waiting for your esteemed observations. And best wishes for your essay, I will go through it as and when it is posted...

    Best Regards

    =snp

    Essay Abstract

    (with minor correction please)....

    In accordance with Dynamic Universe Model frequency shift happens on both the sides of spectrum when any electromagnetic radiation passes grazingly near gravitating mass. This will form the basis for continual Nucleosynthesis (continuous formation of elements) in our Universe. Here we will derive the results using general Physics and Mathematics that changes the frequency of electromagnetic radiation passing near a moving gravitating mass. The frequency of the radiation will increase (Blue shifted) when the relative movement of the gravitating body is in opposite direction to EM radiation and the frequency will reduce when in same direction (Red shifted). Amount of frequency shift will depend on relative velocity difference. This is a general debating paper discussing for understanding of the PREDICTED effect without much ado of mathematics of Dynamic Universe Model. Some questions asked by other physicists about this paper are included in the discussion section

    The same correction to be done in the abstract of Essay PDF also please...{b]

    I am sorry for the error...

    Best

    =snp

      8 days later

      I will not say Gravity is the most fundamental, but it is one of the fundamental when considered as total Gravity of Universe..........

      9 days later

      Zdraste, dear Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta,

      The idea of dynamic Universe model is very good. However, you don't use the fundamental principle of Descartes's about聽identity of space and matter, which allows to see that the Sun releases energy of rotation of the Galaxy. If you say that photons falling on a massive body, then I say that on聽the Sun falls space, which according to Descartes is matter and there is transformed into corpuscles.

      In addition, I showed that the formula of mass - energy equivalence is derived from the existence of the pressure of the Universe. In General, I highly appreciate your essay and hope for reciprocity. Visit my essay

      With respect Boris Dizhechko

        Thank you Gupta for reading my essay.

        I read a lot of essays this year, like the other years, and I have decided to vote only for those who deserve a good vote, because of I don't downgrade other entries; so that this year I voted for a little number of essays: for some reasons it was a disappointing year.

        Your essay is a good essay, but I think it does not answer the question - "What is Fundamental" - or I cannot find it.

        Regards

        Domenico

        Your policy is very good that you don't downgrade other entries, I also do the same, I also will give good marks or none...

        Thank you for saying my essay is a good essay, and it answers your question also- "What is Fundamental" - it is nothing but Gravitation of the Universe acting on that body at that time... or in other words UGF... the universal gravitation force, instead of just two body gravitation....

        Have a look at

        http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/p/blog-page_15.html

        Regards

        =snp

        Zdrastavite Boris Dizhechko

        Thank you for remembering me esyoras...!

        Thank you for saying that the idea of dynamic Universe model is very good.

        You said... "However, you don't use the fundamental principle of Descartes's about identity of space and matter, which allows to see that the Sun releases energy of rotation of the Galaxy..."

        Descartes rejected the splitting of corporeal substance into matter and form; second, he rejected any appeal to final ends, divine or natural, in explaining natural phenomena.[15] In his theology, he insists on the absolute freedom of God's act of creation...... Says present day wikipedia

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Descartes

        Dynamic Universe Model says that the energy in the form of electromagnetic radiation passing grazingly near any gravitating mass changes its in frequency and finally will convert into neutrinos (mass). We all know that there is no experiment or quest in this direction. Energy conversion happens from mass to energy with the famous E=mC2, the other side of this conversion was not thought off. This is a new fundamental prediction by Dynamic Universe Model, a foundational quest in the area of Astrophysics and Cosmology.

        In accordance with Dynamic Universe Model frequency shift happens on both the sides of spectrum when any electromagnetic radiation passes grazingly near gravitating mass. With this new verification, we will open a new frontier that will unlock a way for formation of the basis for continual Nucleosynthesis (continuous formation of elements) in our Universe. Amount of frequency shift will depend on relative velocity difference. All the papers of author can be downloaded from "http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/ "

        You said......."If you say that photons falling on a massive body, then I say that on the Sun falls space, which according to Descartes is matter and there is transformed into corpuscles."

        Dynamic Universe Model says the frequency shift happens when EM radiation goes grazingly .... Not when photons fall into massive body.

        You said ...... "In addition, I showed that the formula of mass - energy equivalence is derived from the existence of the pressure of the Universe. In General, I highly appreciate your essay and hope for reciprocity. Visit my essay"

        I will visit... and post again...

        Best Regards

        =snp

        Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara, I largely agree with you and have already used all their capabilities to boost your rating. The principle of identity of space and matter can improve your model of the dynamic Universe that he fills the gaps between the planets, stars, etc. matter, we do not see and from which to build atoms. molecules, etc..

        I wish all the best to you and your family.

        BSD

        Dear Boris Dizhechko,

        Thank you very much for all the support, I don't know how to repay, except reciprocating your help....

        Best Regards

        =snp

        Hi Frank Dodd Smith

        Why NOTHING is Fundamental ? Dear Frank Dodd Smith.... You can start with the status of Universe is as it is, it is Dynamically Changing......

        Some of the Main foundational points of Dynamic Universe Model :

        Hi Steve Agnew

        Wonderfully matching ideas dear Steve Agnew.... The concept "Although continuous space and time seem to be fundamental to our universe, Discrete Matter and Action is Fundamental" you are correct.... Very nice idea.... I highly appreciate your essay and hope for reciprocity.

        Hi S N P Gupta,

        First you need to realize that I do not try to convince others who have a theory of everything of their own to believe mine. But you asked what I think so I will share...

        As someone else already posted - Your essay really does not answer what is fundamental. My opinion is that what you have presented in your essay will not contribute to a theory of everything. The reasons is because you start with known entities, parameters and equations. I know basic physics and the mathematics required to express the postulates of general relativity. I also know the essence of quantum mechanics and its basic equations and what they represent. My theory is only advanced to the internal energy structure of spacetime, primordial photons and the first two elementary particles that possess mass. It took a 350 page book to present this work. Physicists will need to take over where I left off. However my model does derive all the math of the known physics we have now.

        I am not here to win research money, I am an orthpedic surgeon and my wife a cardiologist - I am only here to help physicists realize that the foundation they are looking for is right under their noses but impossible to arrive at from current math and any experiment that can be performed. I really do not care what my ratings are - It will be even more fun if they are low when reading about it in my historical book about getting the theory of everything out into academia

        I wish you the best of luck -

        Scott S Gordon, MD

          Sayavarapu

          Your article is interesting with many new ideas. However, I am not qualified to judge the idea of frequency shift near a mass, unfortunately.

          Regards from ________________ John-Erik Persson

            Hi Scott S Gordon

            ...........Your words........

            First you need to realize that I do not try to convince others who have a theory of everything of their own to believe mine. But you asked what I think so I will share..

            .................My reply..............

            Yes sir, my thinking was also same, when I gave my first presentation about 35 years back on Dynamic Universe Model in IIT, Madras, India, But immediately I realized people should use this model get the real benefits .... Even after 35 years, whatever the predictions came true like existence of blue shifted Galaxies, the results I show, or results of Dynamic Universe Model..... people never bothered.... Now I came to FAG end of my life...So I am trying to reach individual thinkers like you to make understand this model so that I can pass-on this..... Even-though you are like this now, after getting some more results, I am sure you will do the same at some point of time in your life however closed you keep it.

            .............Your words................

            As someone else already posted - Your essay really does not answer what is fundamental. ..............My reply..............

            You mean I should beat around the bush discussing "what is fundamental", or discussing about the FQXi question ... "what is fundamental?" I took a fundamental question of frequency shifting which is foundational to element formation....and energy to Mass conversion.... Is it not fundamental? Sabine Hossenfelder's observation is important... that's what I told. .................Your words.......

            My opinion is that what you have presented in your essay will not contribute to a theory of everything. .................My reply..............

            I never said Dynamic Universe Model is theory of every thing.... Why did you think like that...?

            .................Your words.......The reasons is because you start with known entities, parameters and equations. I know basic physics and the mathematics required to express the postulates of general relativity. I also know the essence of quantum mechanics and its basic equations and what they represent. My theory is only advanced to the internal energy structure of spacetime, primordial photons and the first two elementary particles that possess mass. It took a 350 page book to present this work. Physicists will need to take over where I left off. However my model does derive all the math of the known physics we have now.

            .................My reply..............

            Good work sir, you did nicely, that means you should use bad words for the other peoples work especially when you don't understand, you ask questions about it, try to understand it....

            .................Your words.......

            I am not here to win research money,

            .................My reply..............

            Very good sir, you are a rich man, you don't require any money.... For me I am not rich, I never got any support from Physics or mathematics communities, either, leave alone financial support, that does not mean I should not tell the benefits of Dynamic Universe Model to others, is it not?

            ..............Your words.......

            I am an orthpedic surgeon and my wife a cardiologist -

            .................My reply..............

            I am retired steel plant employee, my wife is house wife in India.

            .................Your words.......

            I am only here to help physicists realize that the foundation they are looking for is right under their noses but impossible to arrive at from current math and any experiment that can be performed. I really do not care what my ratings are - It will be even more fun if they are low when reading about it in my historical book about g etting the theory of everything out into academia

            .................My reply..............

            Good objective sir, hope they will use your expertise...

            .................Your words.......

            I wish you the best of luck -

            .................My reply..............

            Best wishes to you too, thank you for valuable time spent for reading and giving your esteemed thinking

            =snp

            Dear John-Erik Persson,

            Thank you for your Good words and Blessings.... You please don't Under estimate your self sir....

            Best Wishes for your essay...

            =snp