Satyav,

Certainly. I've replied in detain with links on my string.

Best

Peter

Dear Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta,

You said, "This universe exists now in the present state, it existed earlier, and it will continue to exist in future also in a similar way." Do you think that the universe has existed eternally in the past or did it have a beginning? As for your solution to the N-body problem and other ideas I haven't the expertise to critique them, but it was certainly interesting to see your alternative views. You've obviously put in a tremendous amount of time and effort into them. Your idea of photons passing "grazingly" by a ponderous mass reminds me of Hawking radiation which occurs around the event horizon of a black hole (yes, I know you don't like black holes).

Good luck, Peter

    Dear Prof Peter Bauch

    Dynamic Universe Model says, "This universe exists now in the present state, it existed earlier, and it will continue to exist in future also in a similar way." Do you think that the universe has existed eternally in the past or did it have a beginning?

    ....... Correct sir......

    Australian Astronomers published many papers... There were many Galaxies that had ages before Bigbang, and many got extincted at 1/4 th of age of Bigbang...

    See my essay in FQXi one or two years back for full references of these papers... You can search with Google even...

    ......Your observation......

    As for your solution to the N-body problem and other ideas I haven't the expertise to critique them, but it was certainly interesting to see your alternative views. You've obviously put in a tremendous amount of time and effort into them. Your idea of photons passing "grazingly" by a ponderous mass reminds me of Hawking radiation which occurs around the event horizon of a black hole (yes, I know you don't like black holes).

    ............. Yes I was working on this for the last 35 years....Yes Black holes don't exist.... Hawking's radiation is different. Here I mean grazingly means.... some thing like TANGENTIALLY to a circle, slightly away from it....

    Help me to conduct the experiment for Energy to Mass conversion.....

    Thank you for the supporting words ....

    Best Regards

    =snp

    Dear Peter Jackson

    Thank you for all the nice explanations...

    I want to ask you few more questions, if you don't mind....

    ............ Your words......

    You asked me to explain further.

    For Dark Energy the evidence of something beyond out detection and understanding is now overwhelming from every source, and even with flawed cosmological theory we know it mus contain ~86% of the total mass energy of the universe. It's also the 'condensate' from which all matter condenses. Can we really thing 'pair prooduction' comes from nothing at all! I suggest that would be naive and blinkered. The evidence below isn't exactly mainstream but all is more consistent with the evidence, i.e. resolving a tranche of anomalous findings;

    ..................Correct, matter or energy cannot be produced from nothing....

    ..........Your words....

    As fermions don't detectably interfere with EM when coupled (n=1) they are 'matter' and 'dark'. Despite old theory hanging on, the numbers we now find contribute significantly.

    On cyclic cosmology, answering the 'pre-big bang' paradox and reproducing all CMB anisitropies this model looks better supported than any other including Concordance.;

    ...................... Have a look at my paper also explaining CMB anisotropies...

    ...........Your words.....

    HJ.v36.Cyclic Galaxy & Cosmological evolution. Alspo Google Laniakea and watch the video of cosmic dynamics...............................

    I could not download your PDF please... it was circling around some passwords... can you please send me copy to ... snp.gupta@gmail.com or attach that pdf here to your post?

    ...................Your words....

    Ans in line with modern quantum optics this derivation of quantum redshift at the surface of all expanding Schrodingger sphere surfaces

    Redshift without expansion.

    ...................... Very good idea , and then how will you explain Blue shifted Galaxies?

    .......................Your words...................

    It's well known Newton is incomplete and inaccurate, as is GR but a bit less so, and my essay(s) show(s) QM's 'absolute' time is correct and 'space/time' is simply derived from just diffraction and Doppler shift of waves...........................

    Vet nice and correctly said....

    .......................... Your words......................

    On that subject, last point; when you say 'frequency will increase (red shifted)' you mean 'wavelength'. Redshift is extended waves which gives DECREASED frequency (the time derivative at c). Wavelength (lambda) is blue shift (gamma waves are very short waves so high frequency. Waves are the REAL scalar, and fl is a constant. That's a staple of astronomy, and my see my 'Much Ado about Nothing' essay for more complete analysis.

    ......................

    I am sorry for this error. I was travelling very heavily in that period at the time of posting this essay. I posted the wrong essay....

    Then later I changed the Abstract and posted on Jan 2:

    Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Jan. 2, 2018 @ 21:58 GMT

    Essay Abstract

    I know the essay will not be changed by FQXi....

    Thank you for the thorough observation. And keen reading.....

    .................your words................

    But all good work otherwise. See Also the Sauron survey of galactic rotational shifts and ATLAS3G. I hope that helps.

    Can you please give me a link....?

    Best Regards

    =snp

    Dear SNP Gupta,

    You raise an interesting topic, but like others I don't find a clear fundamental thing or principle or formulae.

    This essay contest rewards well-written ideas that lead to new observations, and maybe yours ideas are that. But I can't make out how you intend to construct all of particle physics and general relativity, least of all make them into limbs of a larger consistent theory.

    It seems to be mere philosophy, and physics requires equations. To be sure, many of the Gedanken you use could be experimentally tested, or already have been (likely also excluding this result).

    Wayne

      Hi Wayne R Lundberg

      Thank you for the nice words and observations.....

      You raise an interesting topic, but like others I don't find a clear fundamental thing or principle or formulae......

      ..............My reply.......

      Here I saw many essays discussing what is fundamental etc, but in this essay, I went for the fundamental issue for energy to mass conversions and blue and redshifts and . I asked for help on observational verifications. I don't have a means for doing the observational verifications as I am an independent researcher.

      FQXi wanted this essay should not be a new essay. This original papers for this essay were published and available in the web, please refer them.

      ....................Your words.......

      This essay contest rewards well-written ideas that lead to new observations, and maybe yours ideas are that. But I can't make out how you intend to construct all of particle physics and general relativity, least of all make them into limbs of a larger consistent theory.

      ...............My reply.....

      Some people respond for such words, some will be like you of course. I am also not working for money. Some professors offered money to change into Main stream with money and Ph D etc , but I thought the Ideology of Dynamic Universe Model are better, and provide the world with more solutions and better predictions, even though nobody supports and provide any money to me. I am approaching each individual with this ideology and inviting them to to read my essay. I came to fag end of life. I don't expect much now.

      I am not intending to solve all the Physics problems, But I am working to provide solutions to cosmology portions. Thirty five experience with cosmological models taught me that there will not be any financial or otherwise support to any theory that is not supporting General theory of Relativity. I don't know why?

      ................. your words...........

      It seems to be mere philosophy, and physics requires equations. To be sure, many of the Gedanken you use could be experimentally tested, or already have been (likely also excluding this result).

      .............. My reply.............

      There were many papers available on internet with full mathematical explanation. I can not give 25 pages of mathematics in just 9 pages. I just touched it. Many the axioms are experimentally tested or having observational support, the prediction here is one of the exceptions. Hope you will help me for this....

      Thank you for your interest in Dynamic Universe Model.......

      Best Regards

      =snp

      Gupta-Ji:

      Very creative thinking and contribution for somebody who is not a "professional" in the field. However, that is precisely what is needed to overcome the religion-like-belief that "the foundation of the edifice of physics has been laid out by GR and QM". Such controlling culture allows only the creation or invention of "new bricks and/or stones that will fit into the existing edifice". If GR and QM have extracted only partial truth of nature, which I believe is true, then we will remain stuck for ever with the partial knowledge of the universe. Such cultural imposition on our thinking has stagnated the evolution of human enquiring minds globally. I am glad to see that FQXi is helping to open up enquiring minds again.

      And, you have developed some logically self-consistent model that are not predicted by the prevailing theories.

      Best of luck!

      Chandra.

        Dear Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta,

        There are thing in your essay I agree with, but overall I find it complex and confusing. But then again I find a lot of things complex and confusing like quantum mechanics and relativity. This does not mean that your dynamic universe model does not have merit. Einstein never got a Nobel prize for relativity, but after he passed most scientists found its value. I am also reminded of atomic theory which was a very debated topic in the history of science. Nowadays you can not get into kindergarten without pledging allegiance to atoms.

        Wishing you the best.

        The individual being is Brahman,

        Don Limuti

          Dear SNP Gupta ji,

          Thanks for reading my essay on Electron Spin and giving your views. I have read your essay and suggest that you read Dark Matter http://vixra.org/pdf/1303.0207v3.pdf

          Best wishes,

          Kamal Rajpal

            Respected Prof Chandrasekhar Roychoudhuri sab,

            Thank you for your wonderful Blessings.. and Thank you for these nice words...

            I got some questions....

            Why Astrophysics and cosmology became "professional"?

            Why should these became a religion-like-belief that "the foundation of the edifice of physics has been laid out by GR and QM"?

            Why they became , Such controlling culture, which allows only the creation or invention of "new bricks and/or stones that will fit into the existing edifice? Why the GR and QM are extracting only partial truth of nature? Why this science became religion or culture?

            Yes I am also very happy that that FQXi is helping to open up enquiring minds again.

            Can you please tell me the truth of some these "why"s, I did not really understand them........?

            Thank you for your blessings once again sir for Blissful words..."you have developed some logically self-consistent model that are not predicted by the prevailing theories."

            Best Regards

            =snp

            Dear Don Limuti

            Thank you for the nice analyzing reply...and nice blessings on my essay...

            You are exactly correct saying "Einstein never got a Nobel prize for relativity, but after " verification" of bending of light rays near Sun.

            You are correct again ..about atomic theory... and for your wonderful words..."

            The individual being is Brahman...."

            Best

            =snp

            Dear Don Limuti

            I gave 10 for your wonderful essay it was 6.1 and after 10 it became 6.5

            Best wishes to your essay

            =snp

            Respected sir,

            Thank you for the nice analyzing reply and your kind Blessings...

            And yours is a very nice essay... I am giving 10, it was 6.6 earlier and now it is 7.2 after 10... Best wishes for the essay....

            Best Regards

            =snp

            ===========

            Dear "SNP": You have raised the following deep sociological question. Even though, I am not sociologist, I am attempting to answer by "going out on a limb"!

            "Why they became , Such controlling culture, which allows only the creation or invention of "new bricks and/or stones that will fit into the existing edifice? Why the GR and QM are extracting only partial truth of nature? Why this science became religion or culture?"

            I am again impressed by your persistent enquiring mind generating newer questions. That is the key to perpetual evolution of human minds. However, this was consciously discouraged by human tribal leaders around the globe once they settled down after developing agriculture, animal husbandry, etc. The strongest and the most intelligent tribal leaders could be easily replaced by any of their progenitors. The continued management remained in the hands of the privileged intellectuals (ministers). That is why the older tribal leaders employed the most intelligent administrators (ministers), while giving them access to opulent life.

            India is the best example that employed this technique earliest in the history. Recall that Veda, Upanishad, Geeta still represents best possible deep-thinking human philosophy. Yet, this knowledge was banned from the masses. That was institutionalization of slavery of Bharatiya masses. It started well before three thousand years ago. That is why Buddha and Jain "rebelled" (~500 years before Christ's birth). But our intellectuals, serving their masters, prevailed. Propagated explanations were brilliant to protect tribalism all over the world (later, feudalism, colonialism, capitalism, etc.). It continues even today with brilliant rationalizations, all over the world, as to why modern Democracy is the best. However, it not facilitating the evolution of all human minds! Subtly, the tribal-cultures, all over the world, have been continuously enhancing the interpretations of democracy to exploit the primitive evolutionary minds of the masses - procreation, survival food, pleasure, a sense of "stable life" and the fear of being deprived of these evolutionary desires. Instead of pro-actively nurturing the evolution of the humans masses, they actively "nurtured" to keep us at the level that we were ten thousand years ago; while enjoying the benefits of most modern technologies, managing our lives with fingers on our smart phones.

            Human evolution can be traced back to five million years old "Lucy", the first primitive bi-pedal human. Compared to Lucy, we are so much advanced in technology. But, we still are not consciously constructing a purposeful human civilization. I am sure everybody raises their children to have some purpose in their lives. But, those purposes are defined and constrained by to which "social-socket they can get themselves plugged in". Only rare few individuals venture to explore the meaning and the purpose of human evolution in the biosphere and their long-term purposes and roles in the cosmo-sphere. No country has defined a long-term national purpose for their collective citizenry. Our tribal leader-classes have become masters of applying skills of "animal husbandry" to manage the thinking-human masses all over the world.

            Only by systematic re-kindling of the enquiring minds of all humans can we start to evolve again as a thinking species. Almost all one-year-olds demonstrate that they are born with superb enquiring minds, displayed by their persistent original questions. But, we successfully kill the evolution of those genetically ordained minds by the time they graduate from college. We tend to grow a pair of long ears and a pair of horns like the ships we raise!

            The masses are systematically deprived of recognizing the higher purpose of human evolution through our ten-thousand years' of matured culture directed toward living as if we really belong to the "Animal Farm" (George Orwell). I am really not saying anything new or profound.

            We need to start thinking along the line of "Evolution Process Congruency" and as system engineers. We humans are here today because the brilliant engineers like Lucy and her husband continued to develop tools and technologies to live better than their "the-then best". That is the core biological evolutionary pressure. Remember, Lucy did not have any mathematics; not even any matured language. But they continued successfully through trial and errors using intuitive thinking to emulate the evolving nature, a marvelous system engineer. When something worked, they were automatically emulating some ontological rule (laws?) of nature.

            Yet no large set of (human invented) mathematical rules, or experimental data can gather COMPLETE information about any entity in this world. We are just advanced "Lucie's". We still do not know exactly what the electrons and photons are. However, we have succeeded in ushering in the Knowledge Age by constructing the Global Internet System!

            Please, read the Ch. 12 on how to think in the Indian paperback of my book, "Causal Physics: Photon by Nob-Interaction of Waves", Taylor and Francis, Indian Paperback (2017). You can also go to my web and down load the papers where my concepts have been developed over the last five decades. Remember, Lucy did not invent the modern religions five million years ago.

            Evolution is collective. Diversity is at the very foundation of biospheric evolution. These are not simply politically expedient expressions. Now that the humans have become thinking animals, it is fundamentally critical for us to allow the diversity of concepts to flourish, as long as they are expressly evolution process congruent. The only certain truth is that no individual humans have ever succeeded in finding the ultimate truth about our Cosmic System, of which, the Solar system is only a minuscule entity. When the Sun becomes a Red Giant, no life will exist in the Solar System. So, humans have to become deep Space-Travelers. Fortunately, we still have a billion years to evolve, provided we do not succeed in exterminating ourselves before becoming deep Space-Travelers!

            My papers: http://www.natureoflight.org/CP/

            Chandra.

              Satyav, (also posted on mine)

              You'll see the explanation for blue galaxies at high z in the 'cyclic..' paper, there's effectively no blue shift, just red, and derivable without accelerating expansion, as here;Video http://youtu.be/KPsCp_S4cUs

              There are many Sauron kinematic survey papers on arXiv i.e; https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0703531.all quite specialist, but all based on the same premiss of Doppler shifts from opposing edge rotation speeds.

              I hope all that helps. Do pass me a link to your CMB anistropy derivation.

              Very best

              Dear S.N.P. Gupta,

              Your dynamic model of the universe is a bit at odds with the general theory of relativity and with any other theory of gravity. However, I believe that any theory or model has the right to exist and there must be quite a lot of such alternative concepts. Only time will put everything in its place and show what concept better reflects reality. I put You high scores for your enthusiasm.

              Best wishes,

              Robert Sadykov

                Very Nice Essay corciovei silviu,

                I gave you 10, previously it was 6.5 now it is 7.2

                best wishes

                =snp