Dear Sue,
I await your response.
The contest pages stay on the site and can be accessed with new comments for at least a year after the contest is over. My first paper on the FQXI site was in 2008, which I think was their first contest and I can still access it and print copies of the paper at this time. I have not tried to put a new comment on that old paper lately, but I did put one on last year's paper after the start of this year's contest. If you at any time desire to communicate privately for security considerations, etc., you could send me an email address, etc. where I can contact you privately and I will send an email address to you where you can contact me. The email account and address password should be private to you only in such a case.
In most cases when someone develops a math/ CAD, SIM model of the universe it is designed and produced to model what they believe to be true. You could, of course, just be producing a model that conforms to the beliefs of one or more others as a way to help them test and further develop their theory even if you believe differently. People do design and build complete world SIM models that they know do not reflect reality when they make video games, although that is usually done to acquire a monetary gain. So my question to you is; do you believe that the world actually came about and works in accordance to the UQS math model or are you just experimenting at this time or helping someone else to check a theory, etc.?
I will try to check out the link that you gave me. The security on my computer sometimes prevents me from viewing movie type simulations, but I will try to see if it works on it.
I checked out the main article of your link and although I couldn't play the image files on my computer due to security concerns, I was able to view four of the Nassim Haramein files on a smart TV and found much repetition in them. They seemed to be out of order and several files seemed to be missing. One had a name and said part one of six and another had a different name and said part six of six, but even if they were both parts of the same set of files, parts two through five were all missing, etc. His concept is built around an infinitely recursive universe in size in both the larger and smaller directions of size. The main problem with this in terms of observed reality is that although the observed universe is composed of several hierarchical structural size levels or layers, they are not just copies of each other. As they increase from small to large in size they also increase in the numbers of different structures and in the complexity of those structures. The implication of this is that as you progress downward in size, you will reach a most basic level that contains the simplest most basic structure(s) that can be made, from which all other things are constructed in that level and in all of the levels above that level. This is actually the case because a simple linear motion is the most basic structure that can be made in this universe that has the ability to act and interact, which are both necessary to allow the progression of structural complexity upward from that lowest level. He says that as you get far enough away from any object it just becomes a point object in your visual field and then jumps to the conclusion that they are all the same. All he is seeing, however, is man's inability to work at all size scales. If you approach to the proper distance from a galaxy, so that when you look at it your field of vision is filled and if you also could look at an atom in the same way, you would see that the atom is not a miniature copy of a galaxy, but is actually a much simpler structure. He doesn't appear to see these things because he is concentrating on the structure of space instead of the entities that exist within that space. He views space as being constructed of triangles that are joined together to form more complex triangle based structures that can be replicated at smaller and smaller or larger and larger sizes infinitely. He does not mention what the boundaries of the triangles are composed of that might in some way contain the infinite energy level that is considered to be contained within each triangular structure. Of course, if an infinite energy level were actually present in the universe, it would likely fill the infinite space equally at all points within that space, since if it didn't, one part of space would contain a greater infinite level of energy than another, which would not make any sense because all infinities would have to be equal. If it were not so, the lower level infinity could not be considered to be truly infinite because more energy could still be added to it to bring it up to the level of the higher level infinity. This means that a space that was filled with infinite energy could not support any action or interaction because it would not be possible to move some of the infinite energy level from one place in space to another place because the place that the energy was removed from would no longer be truly up to the infinite level and the place that the energy was move into would then become the new true infinity and the rest of space would no longer contain infinite energy. It would be a completely stable world in which nothing could happen, so no structures could be built within it. He does not cover whether he believes this energy filled space to have always existed or not. He also does not cover why it is three dimensional. If the space somehow came into being at some point, it would be much simpler in structure and function if it was one dimensional in accordance with the Occam's razor concept that the simplest and shortest path will always be chosen by nature. The space within a one dimensional world could also be infinitely broken down into smaller and smaller dots, etc. Of course, you could not construct the much more complex structures that can be made in a three dimensional world, but to make that choice would mean that the whole structure of the universe would have of necessity been guided and selected by a higher level of intelligence that was purposely designing it with the ability to produce such complex structures even though that would produce a structure that was much more complex than what would be expected to occur from a natural unguided creation. This intelligent being would have to be in existence before the production of the spatial system in order to first have planned it and then to have constructed it. This intelligence could not have been the universe itself because it would not have been in existence yet to be able to plan and build itself in such a complex form. He seems to get many of his concepts from analysis of ancient structures and traditions passed down over time. I believe that this is what you refer to when you mention Vedic Science. It is true that since some of these traditions and relics came from those who possess a greater level of knowledge than is currently available to man on this planet, these traditions and such relics as the pyramids, etc. contain some valid information for man to learn, but they are somewhat hidden in the vagueness of the purposes of their construction and the lost meanings of the details of the traditions, etc., along with the additions of many false concepts over time, so that many of the current understandings of man here are flawed by the lack of a detailed and error free understanding of them. As an example, a pyramid is a very stable structure when constructed on an object that possesses a large gravitational field because as it is built up from the surface of that object the higher levels become progressively smaller and remain centered on the lower levels, thus concentrating the pull of gravity on the center of the base of the structure at all levels. The point at the top of the pyramid and the vertical corner lines can also be used to accept or transmit linear energy entities and the sides present a variable induction pattern due to the variation in their physical size as you proceed from the bottom to the top of the structure. These concepts do have valid useful functions in the construction of devices that can transfer kinetic motion from the surrounding environment into a device that can then be used to channel that motion to produce useful work, such as the generation of electricity or sub-energy fields, etc. A half sphere is also a very stable structure on a large gravity object, but it is more stable in space, when away from such objects than is the pyramid. Those who deal with the fifth vector velocity as a power and transfer source generally use the sphere to a greater degree because the fifth vector velocity generates a curved motion structure in our three dimensional structure that is more or less spherical. Those who only have access to the straight line and angular motion of the fourth vector motion would more likely identify more with the straight line forms of the pyramid, etc., as practical for their usage. In nature the sphere is always the form of large gravity objects although it is often greatly flattened by large scale polarized sub-energy field structures, etc., such as in galaxies, etc. It appears that you differ from Nassim Haramein in that your CAD SIM starts with one singularity and somehow, by the emission of energy pulses, generates all of space and places a very small amount of energy of some form in each spatial position, which in some way divides space into individual measurable positions. This is a much better concept than an infinite amount of energy in each and every spatial point. It would seem to me that the only reason to believe that each point in space contains some energy is to satisfy the quantum mechanics need for space to contain some vacuum energy to account for the production of energy photons and matter particles during interactions, etc. Once an understanding of the existence and operation of sub-energy particles and the sub-energy field structures that are composed of them is obtained, it can then be seen that the energy photons and matter particles that result from interactions are just a result of interactions between energy photons and/or matter particles and sub-energy particles that transfer enough motion to the sub-energy particles to change them into energy photons and matter particles without the need of any energy content that is a part of space itself. All interactions are just energy (motion) transfer operations between motions that already exist. That is why energy conservation works because no new energy (motion) is produced and no existent energy (motion) is destroyed. It is just transferred from one entity to another entity. This eliminates the need to have any energy stored in each spatial position. All that is needed is the initial creation of the spatial structure and the introduction of the motions into it in the form of simple linear motion (sub-energy particles), some of which receive additional motion to convert them into energy photons, some of which also receive additional motion to convert them into matter particles. The main other concept that is necessary to gain an understanding of why an interaction can generate one of several possible outcomes and what generates the probability of the occurrence of each of those outcomes is that sub-energy particles, energy photons, and matter particles all have non-zero physical sizes and that energy photons and matter particles both contain internal motion components that operate within them at angles to their direction of travel. The positioning and current angle of these internal motions at the point of interaction between two entities can, therefore, determine the actual outcome that occurs out of all of the possibilities that exist. Each outcome can occur over a specific range of the total cyclical motion path structures contained within the interacting entities. The size of each range generates the probability of the occurrence of each outcome. Together, understanding these concepts frees one from much of the quantum nonsense and allows a deterministic understanding of the causes of the operations of all interactions between entities. There is then no need for such things as virtual particles or special particles to generate the static mass effect in matter particles, etc. As an example, the static mass effect is clearly seen to be generated by the three dimensional angular motion component of the photon contained within the matter particle as it travels in its cyclical three dimensional curved enclosed path due to its fifth vector motion repetitive cycle. I guess I am getting carried away with things at this point and should stop now until I receive your return comment, which could answer some things that would make some of this comment unnecessary.
You are welcome. Sharing insights and providing opportunity for exchange is what I am here for to all that can receive and/or add to an understanding of the true nature of the universe that we live in and even beyond that for those who can receive it.
Sincerely,
Paul