Don Limuti
Thanks again.
Yes, if that bookbinder had known mathematics we perhaps had been talking about Farady's equations instead of Maxwell's.
From John-Erik
Fundamental Errors in Physics by John-Erik Persson
My dear Erik
It's nice to hearing you again, especially with the critical part of your works (and somewhat also of my). That is very remarkable that you honestly opposing to dominating majority, that is why I seen my duty to supporting you as much as it was possible. Thank you for your kindly words which really was valuable for me. And I am a little bit disappointed only that we have a certain difference on relation to ether. You mark that "I follow to patent engineer who had rejected the ether." I want just tell you here - sorry my dear it is not so, because the matter is more serious. By the way, Einstein actually does not remove the ether but he only declare this verbally. And the ether continued functioning in his theories .... just under new name! So, he has say one thing and actually doing an other thing. This fact noticed by other Jewish physicist Mario Rabinowitz - before of me. So, this matter is very interesting that has some history. If you wish then I can send you some references - after this battle of course. And now I can only wish you good healthy and wealthy, in your life!
My best wishes,
George
Dear John,
Here we are again all together.
I like your description to. I agree with you, that theoretical physics of today depends on more than 100 years old assumptions and interpretations of experiments, that are made in error.
I hope that my modest achievements can be information for reflection for you.
Vladimir Fedorov
https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3080
16 days later
John-Erik
Thanks for your post on mine with link to your last blog. I replied as below;;
..Thanks, I agree with much. But were you aware in the final great Michelson experiment, at Chicago with Gale & Pearson (MGP) he concluded; ETHER! Which worked in the way of the Stokes 'ether drag' model, which is now as Minkowski (1908) & Einstein's (1952) 'spaces (or 'discrete fields') in motion within spaces', as the DFM.
Ref the discussion in your blog post the following are directly relevant and pertinent. Do question them;
Best
Peter