Electromagnetism is Fundamental by George Rajna

Dear George Rajna,

Thanks for your well-argued essay. I believe that subject of essay is 'What is fundamental' and you stated that

'Electromagnetism is Fundamental'. For electromagnetism to originate and perform, certain material entities are essential. Electromagnetism does not appear out of nothing. Therefore, the material entities that produce electromagnetism are more fundamental than electromagnetism.

With regards, Nainan

Hi George,

I suspect the lack of comments and points is again due to the difficulty of extracting the meaning through the poor English. Did you use an auto translate programme? I'm used to your work now so understood your concepts and explanations but it was slow and many may give up! You also a number of times wrote something is 'explained by' yet no real scientific explanation as would be expected by most was offered. (I'm just trying to explain to avoid you being depressed by the lack of responses and scoring).

I have offered in the past to do a translation check for you and will do if you ask. i.e. passages like "In the referential frame of the accelerating electrons the charge density lowering linearly because of the linearly growing way they takes every next time period. From the referential frame of the wire there is a parabolic charge density lowering. may seem nonsense at the speed most scan through essays. Even I needed to read it 3 times!

More comprehendable may be; In the accelerated electron rest frame the linear time progression gives linear charge density reduction. In the wires rest frame charge density reduces parabolically" (assuming that's what you meant).

For me it was interesting and fundamental so should have a higher score. Agreement with theory is not a criteria and some pretexts may be considered questionable, i.e. the concept of electricity as electron particles 'racing along' wires has been surpassed in the relevant specialist and related fields such as quantum optics. None the less if 'accellerated' can also be seen as 'charged or energised' the logic of your descriptions is sustained.

I hope you get to read and can understand mine, which gives the kind of explanations I refer to - also like yours, an experiment, but an entirely new one analysing electron moment distributions - somewhat compatible with yours.

As regarts The lorentz transformation, if a signal encounters a dense '2-fluid' electron (Maxwell) near/far field transition zone, i.e. at a moving 'refractive plane', and all electrons re-emit EM radiation at c in their OWN local rest frame; why would that not implement the required transformation?

Best of luck in the contest. (I'm not applying scores until all the entries are in)

Peter

Hi George Rajna

You said "Electromagnetism is Fundamental" dear wonderfully multi talented George Rajna.... Can you derive Gravity also from Electromagnetism.... ? I am also electrical engineer. It is a very nice idea.... I highly appreciate your essay and hope and request you please spend some of the valuable time on Dynamic Universe Model also and give your some of the valuable & esteemed guidance

Some of the Main foundational points of Dynamic Universe Model :

-No Isotropy

-No Homogeneity

-No Space-time continuum

-Non-uniform density of matter, universe is lumpy

-No singularities

-No collisions between bodies

-No blackholes

-No warm holes

-No Bigbang

-No repulsion between distant Galaxies

-Non-empty Universe

-No imaginary or negative time axis

-No imaginary X, Y, Z axes

-No differential and Integral Equations mathematically

-No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to GR on any condition

-No Creation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models

-No many mini Bigbangs

-No Missing Mass / Dark matter

-No Dark energy

-No Bigbang generated CMB detected

-No Multi-verses

Here:

-Accelerating Expanding universe with 33% Blue shifted Galaxies

-Newton's Gravitation law works everywhere in the same way

-All bodies dynamically moving

-All bodies move in dynamic Equilibrium

-Closed universe model no light or bodies will go away from universe

-Single Universe no baby universes

-Time is linear as observed on earth, moving forward only

-Independent x,y,z coordinate axes and Time axis no interdependencies between axes..

-UGF (Universal Gravitational Force) calculated on every point-mass

-Tensors (Linear) used for giving UNIQUE solutions for each time step

-Uses everyday physics as achievable by engineering

-21000 linear equations are used in an Excel sheet

-Computerized calculations uses 16 decimal digit accuracy

-Data mining and data warehousing techniques are used for data extraction from large amounts of data.

- Many predictions of Dynamic Universe Model came true....Have a look at

http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/p/blog-page_15.html

I request you to please have a look at my essay also, and give some of your esteemed criticism for your information........

Dynamic Universe Model says that the energy in the form of electromagnetic radiation passing grazingly near any gravitating mass changes its in frequency and finally will convert into neutrinos (mass). We all know that there is no experiment or quest in this direction. Energy conversion happens from mass to energy with the famous E=mC2, the other side of this conversion was not thought off. This is a new fundamental prediction by Dynamic Universe Model, a foundational quest in the area of Astrophysics and Cosmology.

In accordance with Dynamic Universe Model frequency shift happens on both the sides of spectrum when any electromagnetic radiation passes grazingly near gravitating mass. With this new verification, we will open a new frontier that will unlock a way for formation of the basis for continual Nucleosynthesis (continuous formation of elements) in our Universe. Amount of frequency shift will depend on relative velocity difference. All the papers of author can be downloaded from "http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/ "

I request you to please post your reply in my essay also, so that I can get an intimation that you replied

Best

=snp

Dear George Rajna,

I have read your Essay and your brief note on wave-particle.

I invite you to read my Essay on wave particle and Electron Spin at: https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3145 or https://fqxi.org/data/essay-contest-files/Rajpal_1306.0141v3.pdf

Kamal Rajpal

Hello George,

You have apparently chosen to identify the fundamental underpinning of a particular area of interest to physicists and cosmologists.

Essays in their essence are attempts to communicate to others or to clarify issues in the minds of their authors. The use of unfamiliar symbols, mathematical equations and specialised professional jargon pose limitations upon the extent that the essays can be comprehended by a 'well-educated but non-specialist audience'.

It is important that each of us pursues his or her interests, with the caveat that such pursuits should not damage the interests of others.

Good luck in the pursuit of your interests.

Go well,

Gary.

Hi George,

The glimpses I get of your work indicate some profound insight.

I too believe that gravity is electro-magnetic.

Do take a look at my essay, we have at least one similar insight.

Thanks for your essay,

Don Limuti