Essay Abstract

Nothing exists for itself, everything is connected. Relationships are important in all sciences, both natural and social. Here we will focus on the most common interest of the participants in this competition, and these are the relations that are important for the functioning of the universe. The attitudes here are mostly expressed in math, which is due to the same comprehension for everyone due to translation problems, especially when it is a Google translate (as here).

Author Bio

Zivlak Branko is a retired meteorologist. Had been working in applied meteorology, climatology, computer science and ecology. He represented his country at the "Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change" (IPCC) and the "Global Climate Observing System" (GCOS). In the recent years, he became interested in the issues related to the functioning of the Universe.

Download Essay PDF File

Dear Branko,

Your essay is very deep with an extremely important dialectical-ontological conclusion:"Attraction and repulsion are the most important opposites that governs movements in nature."

I wish you good luck!

All the Best,

Vladimir

    聽Hi Branko

    You've sung the opposite relationship. Bravo!

    I am skeptical about the smallest quantities of Plank and I believe it is better to apply the principle of irrationality, when the values exist even when they are infinitely small. There is a view that I also support that the fine structure constant depends only on PI.

    Do you have a formula which contains the ratio of the Planck constant and the speed of light . So here it is in New Cartesian聽physics聽is聽quantum perceived as constant, which is equal to the product of mass and radius of the corpuscle, i.e., the mass depends on its radius and can聽not be a quantum, which is looking at the famous LHC.

    Branko, you are a worthy successor of the teachings of Boskovica:"Attraction and repulsion are the most important opposites that governs movements in nature."

    I will not distract you from earning points. I answered you symmetrically.

    I wish you success

    Hi Boris

    As it is written in Table 1. This is "lower limit" not smallest quantities. This does not exclude the principle of irrationality.

    I also support that the fine structure constant depends only on PI.

    So I wrote in essay. 1. The fine structure constant is fixed in time and is the same in every part of the universe.

    The problem is, that it is necessary to determine many other so far unknown relationships to understand this constant.

    Regarding alpha you can read in my general science yournal articles.

    Regards

    Branko

    Boris

    the ratio of the Planck constant and the speed of light is also product of two opposites. You can see in my GS Journal article about opposites.

    Regards

    Branko

    Dear Branko

    I have problems with proving that I am not a robot so this is the third time that I write this answer.

    Out of an emergent reality there can emerge a new different point from where new realities are emerging. This new point is however always and everywhere in contact with the original point of creation.

    In my model Planck area cannot be SEEn, because seeing is an emergent quality, the border of emergent and Planck is explained in the essay.

    Time and Space in an emergent reality are "existing" as emergent phenomena.Infinite time and space means that they have no beginning and no end...Maybe there is areality where time and space SEEM eternal for the agent involved, however then it is an illusion...Time and space are both ETERNAL AVAILABILITIES as ETERNAL ROBABILITIES in the Point of Origin of our reality.

    I will read an rate your essay now

    thank you for making me think again

    Wilhelmus

    Dear Branko L Zivlak,

    You wrote: "Our world seems to be a massive collection of opposites."

    I have concluded from my deep research that Nature must have devised the only permanent real structure of the Universe obtainable for the real Universe existed for millions of years before man and his finite complex informational systems ever appeared on earth. The real physical Universe consists only of one single unified VISIBLE infinite surface occurring eternally in one single infinite dimension that am always illuminated mostly by finite non-surface light.

    Joe Fisher, ORCID ID 0000-0003-3988-8687. Unaffiliated

    Dear Joe

    Yes I have quote: "Our world seems to be a massive collection of opposites."

    Regarding: Universe existed for millions of years before man and his finite complex informational systems ever appeared on earth. I would say eternally before man...

    Regarding the rest of your claim: If you carefully read my essay you would say that I show same by mathematic.

    Good lack at competition

    Branko

    6 days later

    Dear Branko,

    In your approach, I miss the efforts of Garrett Birkhoff and John von Neumann to establish a fundament that emerges into a suitable modeling platform. In their 1936 paper, they introduced a relational structure that they called quantum logic and that mathematicians call an orthomodular lattice. It automatically emerges into a separable Hilbert space, which also introduces a selected set of number systems into the modeling platform. Hilbert spaces can only cope with division rings and separable Hilbert spaces can store discrete values but no continuums. Each infinite dimensional separable Hilbert space owns a unique non-separable Hilbert space that embeds its separable partner. In this way, the structure and the functionality of the platform grow in a restricted way. After a few steps a very powerful and flexible modeling platform evolves. This model acts as a repository for dynamic geometric data that fit in quaternionic eigenvalues of dedicated operators. The non-separable part of the model can archive continuums that are defined by quaternionic functions.

    In other words, the foundation that was discovered by Birkhoff and von Neumann delivers a base model that can offer the basement of well-founded theories and that puts restrictions on the dimensions which universe can claim.

    Multiple Hilbert spaces can share the same underlying vector space and form a set of platforms that float on a background platform. On those platforms can live objects that hop around in a stochastic hopping path. This adds dynamics to the model.

    The orthomodular lattice acts like a seed from which a certain kind of plant grows. Here the seed turns into the physical reality that we perceive.

    The Wikiversity Hilbert Book Model Project investigates this approach.

    https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Hilbert_Book_Model_Project

    http://vixra.org/author/j_a_j_van_leunen contains documents that treat some highlights of the project.

    Mr. van Leunen

    My suitable modeling platform is based on Plancks and Bošković efforts.

    For the predictions and attitudes in my essay, which you ignore, the results of Garrett Birkhoff and John von Neumann were not necessary.

    I agree with your attitude:

    „Study of the physical reality can happen in two different ways that meet each other at a certain point and then complement each other."

    I often used it to get to my predictions and results.

    Regards,

    Branko

    Dear Zivlak,

    an interesting essay that worths an high rate. We have many point in common, since your conclusion is very similar to my absolute relativism. I start by Nagarjuna's idea of a relational reality without intrinsic existence.

    Due my formation in philosophy, sadly I missed the mathematical part of your essay: I'm not sure if you consider the Planck's lenght being somewhat fundamental/constant.

    Bests,

    Francesco D'Isa

    Dear Francesco

    Thank you for your interest in my essay.

    As you say: В«My point is that despite being physical, [velocity] can't exist by itself. It requires a relation with another physical system...What if all physical properties were like velocity.

    I just came to that with mathematics thanks to Planck's units (not just Planck's lengths). Perhaps, as a philosopher, you can specify which philosophers have used the principle of opposites, might otherwise stated? In Nāgārjūn it is: „The determination of a thing or object is only possible in relation to other things or objects, especially by way of contrast". BTW, I use the principle of opposites, thanks to a contemporary philosopher, but I do not find it in contemporary physics.

    You have wrote:

    2. Things are relationships. I have wrote relationship are fundamental, so basicly we agree.

    Your is also an interesting essay that worths an high rate.

    Regards,

    Branko

      Thank you very much, I got your point now.Thank you also for reading and for your appreciation.

      Best wishes and good luck!

      Hi Branko L Zivlak, Dzrastravite

      Wonderful idea dear Branko L Zivlak.... "Nothing exists for itself, everything is connected. Relationships are important in all sciences, both natural and social. ...these are the relations that are important for the functioning of the universe." .......... very nice idea.... I highly appreciate your essay and hope for reciprocity.

      Here Dynamic Universe model also finds a relationship for changing energy into matter

      I request you to please have a look at my essay also, and give some of your esteemed criticism for your information........

      Dynamic Universe Model says that the energy in the form of electromagnetic radiation passing grazingly near any gravitating mass changes its in frequency and finally will convert into neutrinos (mass). We all know that there is no experiment or quest in this direction. Energy conversion happens from mass to energy with the famous E=mC2, the other side of this conversion was not thought off. This is a new fundamental prediction by Dynamic Universe Model, a foundational quest in the area of Astrophysics and Cosmology.

      In accordance with Dynamic Universe Model frequency shift happens on both the sides of spectrum when any electromagnetic radiation passes grazingly near gravitating mass. With this new verification, we will open a new frontier that will unlock a way for formation of the basis for continual Nucleosynthesis (continuous formation of elements) in our Universe. Amount of frequency shift will depend on relative velocity difference. All the papers of author can be downloaded from "http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/ "

      Some of the Main foundational points of Dynamic Universe Model :

      -No Isotropy

      -No Homogeneity

      -No Space-time continuum

      -Non-uniform density of matter, universe is lumpy

      -No singularities

      -No collisions between bodies

      -No blackholes

      -No warm holes

      -No Bigbang

      -No repulsion between distant Galaxies

      -Non-empty Universe

      -No imaginary or negative time axis

      -No imaginary X, Y, Z axes

      -No differential and Integral Equations mathematically

      -No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to GR on any condition

      -No Creation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models

      -No many mini Bigbangs

      -No Missing Mass / Dark matter

      -No Dark energy

      -No Bigbang generated CMB detected

      -No Multi-verses

      Here:

      -Accelerating Expanding universe with 33% Blue shifted Galaxies

      -Newton's Gravitation law works everywhere in the same way

      -All bodies dynamically moving

      -All bodies move in dynamic Equilibrium

      -Closed universe model no light or bodies will go away from universe

      -Single Universe no baby universes

      -Time is linear as observed on earth, moving forward only

      -Independent x,y,z coordinate axes and Time axis no interdependencies between axes..

      -UGF (Universal Gravitational Force) calculated on every point-mass

      -Tensors (Linear) used for giving UNIQUE solutions for each time step

      -Uses everyday physics as achievable by engineering

      -21000 linear equations are used in an Excel sheet

      -Computerized calculations uses 16 decimal digit accuracy

      -Data mining and data warehousing techniques are used for data extraction from large amounts of data.

      - Many predictions of Dynamic Universe Model came true....Have a look at

      http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/p/blog-page_15.html

      I request you to please post your reply in my essay also, so that I can get an intimation that you replied

      Best

      =snp

      Thank You Mr. Gupta

      I was going to ask you a few questions. For now only one question: In meteorology we have these formations: cyclone, anticyclone, troughs, ridge, saddle. What would be the appropriate five formations in cosmology? What are the masses, speeds and acceleration at the transition between these formations? Or maybe you have link.

      If you agree later I would have more questions on your post.

      Regards,

      Branko

        Dear Branko,

        I found it interesting that you mention the constancy of the product of mass and Compton wavelength. As you may know, this is often also expressed by saying that for a given mass m, the product of its Schwarzschild radius and its Compton wavelength is constant at the square of Planck length.

        I, as well as other researchers, have been inspired by this fact to propose a new length scale, as for instance discussed in these two papers [link:arxiv.org/abs/1704.00747][new length][/link],[link:arxiv.org/abs/1705.05330][newlength2][/link].

        Perhaps this might be of interest to you.

        My thanks and best regards,

        Tejinder

        You are writing: "Universe is all that exist." and "Nothing exists for itself, everything is connected."

        Questions: What is connected to the Universe? What is opposite to the Universe?

          Universe is all that exist by definition. If not, what is the other word that defines all that exist? Everything is everything that emerge in the universe. Universe is not a single feature that could have the opposite. The universe is a collection of all the features. So one of the features of the universe is that it has a final mass. Opposite of that mass is the smallest mass. The opposite of the age of the Universe is Planck time. The quantitative and qualitative features and phenomenon of the universe have their domains, not the word universe. I do not know what's the opposite of a man, but I know what's the opposite of a tall man.

          Dear Branko,

          I suggest you to use a new name - omniverse. It may contain at least two items: Universe and opposite Antiverse. The Antiverse contains only antimatter. It is solution for problem of missing antimatter in the Universe.

          The opposite to man is woman :-)

          Best regards,

          Ilgaitis