The Mysterious “Fundamental” by Brajesh Mishra

Dear Brajesh Mishra,

You wrote in the Abstract: "Nature is much more complex and mysterious than what is appears to a human eye. It has motivated and would continue to motivate human (and similar intelligent creatures) to enrich the existing fundamental stream of knowledge and create newer ones in their never ending quest to unravel the mysteries of the Nature."

I have concluded from my deep research that Nature must have devised the only permanent real structure of the Universe obtainable for the real Universe existed for millions of years before man and his finite complex informational systems ever appeared on earth. The real physical Universe consists only of one single unified VISIBLE infinite surface occurring eternally in one single infinite dimension that am always illuminated mostly by finite non-surface light.

Joe Fisher, ORCID ID 0000-0003-3988-8687. Unaffiliated

The Mysterious "Fundamental" by Brajesh Mishra

Hi Brajesh Mishraji

Your OP "Nature is much more complex and mysterious than what is appears to a human eye." Is extremely correct. It is very nice to get acquainted with multi talented person from age old education hub of India like you.... I am very happy.... Dear Brajesh Mishra.....

I highly appreciate your essay and I request you please spend some of the valuable time on Dynamic Universe Model also and give your some of the valuable & esteemed guidance

Some of the Main foundational points of Dynamic Universe Model :

-No Isotropy

-No Homogeneity

-No Space-time continuum

-Non-uniform density of matter, universe is lumpy

-No singularities

-No collisions between bodies

-No blackholes

-No warm holes

-No Bigbang

-No repulsion between distant Galaxies

-Non-empty Universe

-No imaginary or negative time axis

-No imaginary X, Y, Z axes

-No differential and Integral Equations mathematically

-No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to GR on any condition

-No Creation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models

-No many mini Bigbangs

-No Missing Mass / Dark matter

-No Dark energy

-No Bigbang generated CMB detected

-No Multi-verses

Here:

-Accelerating Expanding universe with 33% Blue shifted Galaxies

-Newton's Gravitation law works everywhere in the same way

-All bodies dynamically moving

-All bodies move in dynamic Equilibrium

-Closed universe model no light or bodies will go away from universe

-Single Universe no baby universes

-Time is linear as observed on earth, moving forward only

-Independent x,y,z coordinate axes and Time axis no interdependencies between axes..

-UGF (Universal Gravitational Force) calculated on every point-mass

-Tensors (Linear) used for giving UNIQUE solutions for each time step

-Uses everyday physics as achievable by engineering

-21000 linear equations are used in an Excel sheet

-Computerized calculations uses 16 decimal digit accuracy

-Data mining and data warehousing techniques are used for data extraction from large amounts of data.

- Many predictions of Dynamic Universe Model came true....Have a look at

http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/p/blog-page_15.html

I request you to please have a look at my essay also, and give some of your esteemed criticism for your information........

Dynamic Universe Model says that the energy in the form of electromagnetic radiation passing grazingly near any gravitating mass changes its in frequency and finally will convert into neutrinos (mass). We all know that there is no experiment or quest in this direction. Energy conversion happens from mass to energy with the famous E=mC2, the other side of this conversion was not thought off. This is a new fundamental prediction by Dynamic Universe Model, a foundational quest in the area of Astrophysics and Cosmology.

In accordance with Dynamic Universe Model frequency shift happens on both the sides of spectrum when any electromagnetic radiation passes grazingly near gravitating mass. With this new verification, we will open a new frontier that will unlock a way for formation of the basis for continual Nucleosynthesis (continuous formation of elements) in our Universe. Amount of frequency shift will depend on relative velocity difference. All the papers of author can be downloaded from "http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/ "

I request you to please post your reply in my essay also, so that I can get an intimation that you replied

Best

=snp

Respected Brajesh Mishraji

Thank you for all the nice words... You can any depth into Dynamic Universe Model no problem. All the papers and books are available for free from its web page...

https://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.com/

............Your words.....

The outcome of experiments, as suggested by you, can tell how far your model is accepted by the Scientist Community. My please refer para 6.1 on sustainability of scientific theories - There I have mentioned - In place of expecting to see rise of absolute theory (perpetually true theory) it would be better to rate nascent theory by making use of Bayesian inference to update the probability for it to be true as more evidence or information becomes available.

My view is that any model cannot be a true reflection of reality. At a given point of time - we may have different competing theories that will qualify as a 'Fundamental Theories'. We are only a budding knowledge society as of now.

6.1 The scientific reasoning can be broadly categorised into deductive reasoning (going from general to the specific conclusions; conclusions must be true if the premises are true), inductive reasoning (we go from the specific to the general; premises support the conclusions/hypothesis/probable), and abductive reasoning (starts with an incomplete set of observations and proceeds to the likeliest possible explanation/ 'educated guess' for group of observations)4. While inductive & abductive reasoning are used by Scientists to form hypotheses and theories, the deductive reasoning is used to apply theories to specific situations.

................. Reply.................

Dynamic Universe Model made many predictions earlier which came true after 9 years , 11 years etc... Many came true, dear mishraji... this in one more prediction.... I hope this also will come true soon...

But scientific community view on this model is very bad till now... mostly support Bigbang based cosmologies, no support whatever the predictions came true or accuracies.... Or what ever the failures of mainstream physics.

Please search for nucleosynthesis paper in my blog above and you can download the paper

https://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.com/

Thank you once again...

best regards

=snp

Mishraji,

Dynamic Universe Model is totally based on experimental results or observations only....

Predictions are on mathematically derived.... Many came true, This one is new...

Best

=snp

Dear Mishraji,

Your essay is Good, it requires appreciation... I am giving my highest appreciation possible...

Best wishes to your essay

=snp

Dear Fellow Essayists

This will be my final plea for fair treatment.,

FQXI is clearly seeking to find out if there is a fundamental REALITY.

Reliable evidence exists that proves that the surface of the earth was formed millions of years before man and his utterly complex finite informational systems ever appeared on that surface. It logically follows that Nature must have permanently devised the only single physical construct of earth allowable.

All objects, be they solid, liquid, or vaporous have always had a visible surface. This is because the real Universe must consist only of one single unified VISIBLE infinite surface occurring eternally in one single infinite dimension that am always illuminated mostly by finite non-surface light.

Only the truth can set you free.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Hi Brajesh,

I appreciate your comprehensive overview of what is "fundamental". Your essay subsumed many of the essays in this contest.

I liked:

1. "Further, Science has to develop to a stage where it can explain the complexities of Social Sciences. Thus, perhaps we have yet not reached the right stage of scientific journey to understand 'Fundamental'.

2. I checked your first reference and found, Kipling: "I keep six honest serving-men (They taught me all I knew); Their names are What and Why and When And How and Where and Who."

Question: Varanasi is known as a holy city. Do you find it special? Are people there interested in physics?

A parting thought stolen from GK Chesterton:"I would maintain that thanks are the highest form of thought; and that gratitude is happiness doubled by wonder."

Thanks,

Don Limuti

Dear Brajesh,

I highly appreciate your well-written essay in an effort to understand.

It is so close to me. «Are we in right stage of scientific journey to discover 'Fundamental'?»

I hope that my modest achievements can be information for reflection for you.

Vladimir Fedorov

https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3080

Dear Brajesh Mishra, you wrote a good essay, however, it was better if you were familiar with the New Cartesian Physics, where the fundamental is a space which according to the principle of identity of space and matter Descartes, is a matter and back matter is a physical space. Time is a synonym for universal movement of the physical space. Thus, the "Fifth dimension" is a physical space.No more dualism between matter and space, between mind and body. Consciousness arises when a body appears the ability to create in space the image of the external world and to remember him for discernment and judgment. In the center of this image of the external world is the body that created it and which is actively positioning itself to prolong its existence.

New Cartesian Physics needs your support to develop further. Visit my page and give your assessment there. FQXi Fundamental in New Cartesian Physics by Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich

I wish you success! Sincerely, Boris Dizhechko

Dear Brajesh,

Your rather simplistic method of analysis is one that greatly appeals to me. I have rated it much like I would have rated my own essay, for I myself have not adopted any formal method of analysis, and many of your trains of thought coincide with mine!-especially your reflections concerning the current state of scientific theories. You have given a very apt summation of the current state of human knowledge.

Regards,

Aditya

Dear Brajesh Mishra, for your intelligent questions 10. I'll try to answer them as it looks New Cartesian Physics, which is based on the principle of identity of space and matter of Descartes. Sometimes you like to look at the sky and it seems to you infinite empty space in which it moves large and small body. However, this impression is deceptive. According to this principle, Descartes, space is matter that moves. When Copernicus asserted that the Earth revolves around the Sun, he had to add that along with the Earth revolves around the Sun, all the solar space. Space is what created the universe. Time is a synonym for universal total movement of the physical space. Thus, space is the Foundation for fundamental theories. Space contains information about the development of the Universe. Space is the body of God.

The principle of identity of physical space and matter allows us to extend physics to living matter. For this we need to pay attention to the fact that matter within the body is the same as outside the body. Our brain creates an image of the outside world not within themselves and in the space around them. This way the outside world has an active nature, as it controls the body.

New Cartesian Physics needs your support to develop further. Visit my page and give your assessment there.

I hope you highly rathing appreciate her ideas.

FQXi Fundamental in New Cartesian Physics by Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich

I wish you success! Sincerely, Boris Dizhechko

Dear Brajesh,

(copy to yours and mine)

Thanks for the kind words and advice. «I would suggest you to subsequently develop your ideas for people who are from non-science background».

I wish you happiness in your scientific work in search of truth.

Vladimir Fedorov

https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3080

Brajesh,

Lovely essay, I'm very glad I got to it. I think the nub and truth is best summed up here;

"The boundary between different streams of basic Science is yet to melt down. Further, Science has to develop to a stage where it can explain the complexities of Social Sciences. Thus, perhaps we have yet not reached the right stage of scientific journey to understand 'Fundamental'."

I've assigned it to our current limit of intellectual development, not helped by out reliance on calculators to explore the mysteries of nature.

I also agree the; " The Five 'Ws' [What, When, Where, Who & Why]" should be utmost. I hope you'll read mine, which sows the power of doing so in deriving a Classical explanation of QM simply by better more complex rationalisation; a better starting assumption (Maxwell & Poincare sphere 2 Vector Pairs NOT singlet states) and pulling in Cos Latitude momentum distributions from Geophysics for interaction analysis.

Yet mainstream includes the judges, so no advancement will likely be admitted until we evolve rather more - if we don't loose the ability to think!

Well done for yours. Hope you get to mine.

Very best

Peter.