Yes, Vladimir, for a long time believed that the Foundation for fundamental theories is matter, a mandatory attribute which was mass. Once there was a formula of mass - energy equivalence, which has revolutionized the field of high energy about the matter rarely began to remember and physics has lost the Foundation. Often began to use the assertion that matter exists in space and in time , which justifies the concept of space-time. The principle of identity of space and matter Descartes negate such an equalization of these two concepts and allows us to speak about what the space is moving. Time is a synonym for universal total movement.

Dear Boris,

Thanks for appreciating my essay The Mysterious "Fundamental" ( https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2998 )

As suggested by you I have tried to get familiar with the New Cartesian Physics. I am impressed with the explanation about SPACE and TIME.

Whether this explanation about the Nature becomes THE Fundamental theory, or gets treated as one of the explanation, is ultimately limited to perception, imagination and the state of knowledge of the OBSERVER / Human species in this case. The current state of knowledge, we human possess, is lacking in many ways which I have tried to delve in my essay.

Best Wishes.

Brajesh Mishra

Yes it is obvious as you say --- too much of modern physics is based on "over the top" maths, and too many solutions are just mathematical results not physics interpretations. I have to say I can see many common threads and ideas with Edwin's essay. Also the basis of modern physics isn't based on a good philosophical foundation so I can see where you are coming from in your essay.

Impressive results I will be reading your essay again and again over the next few weeks to understand it totally.

I hope you do very well in the competition a great essay. Yours Harri. I have rated it highly.

If you have time have a look at my essay https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3133

Yours Harri

    Dear Jouko Tiainen Harri, the speed of light as the imaginary unit is very interesting, I bet 10. But I think you don't need to associate a complex number with the geometry of Minkowski is interesting only from an analytical point of view, but not physical. In New Cartesian Physics is the imaginary unit used as an operator of rotation of the radius vector 90 degrees, the square of the imaginary unit turns the radius-vector by 180 degrees. Thus, where the formula is the imaginary unit, we observe a rotation.

    New Cartesian Physics needs your support to develop further. Visit my page and give your assessment there.

    I hope that you are interested in her ideas.

    FQXi Fundamental in New Cartesian Physics by Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich

    I wish you success! Sincerely, Boris Dizhechko

    Hello Boris,

    I enjoyed your comment to the effect that we 'need to break away from real life and go into a virtual world which allows everyone to create their fantasies on the subject of modern physics.' Many have done to so, to the effect of making the discipline of physics much less disciplined.

    I concur with you that 'the Foundation of physics was originally based upon (the search for) truth, entirely covering the whole real world" The apparent absence of absolute truth should not deter us from seeking relative truth when to do so benefits mankind.

    The fragmentation of physics and mathematics are overriding and undermining any prospects of achieving the harmonic integration of systems.

    I suspect that Rene Descartes' perceptions of physics were last time that the discipline has been truly disciplined. Looking backwards, perhaps that is the place from which we should begin again to search for new directions.

    Concerning your statement that the 'Pressure of [vacuum in] space is the cause of all movements occurring in the real world'; in matter we find an exhibition of defiance against vacuum (the predominant constituent of the cosmos), the exception that proves the rule. What is the rule? The rule is that vacuum abhors nature, and flows to fill its absence. We are players in a kind of push-me-pull-you game that we misinterpret from the earth as a gravitational 'pull' but which when seen from outer space would be recognizable as a 'push'.

    Keep sharpening your focus and your pencils I believe that you are going down the right road. itsinmybook.com

    Thank you and best wishes Boris,

    Gary

      Thank you Gary for your kind words. You great entered the New Cartesian Physics in his scientific picture of the world.

      Boris

      Dear Boris Dizhechko,

      Thanks for visiting my Essay page and for intervening in my conversation with Albert Einstein.

      I find your Essay very nice. In fact, I have always been a great estimator of Rene Descartes. In particular, I find very interesting the connection between the Lorentz transformations and the probability density because it links classical to quantum physics. Did you attempt to submit your ideas to some specialist journal?

      In any case, this is an entertaining Essay, deserving my high score.

      Good luck in the Contest.

      Cheers, Ch.

        Dear Christian Corda, thanks for the kind words. I here urge all researchers to remember the principle of identity of space and matter of Descartes to develop his theory only by common efforts taking into account the achievements of modern science

        Sincerely, Boris Dizhechko

        I too am a big fan of Descartes and Cartesian space and time are the foundations of mainstream science. So it is not surprising that people are uncomfortable with setting space and time aside in favor of things like matter and action. Our language, after all, is based on space and time and we have a very difficult time getting beyond space and time.

        My notion is that discrete matter and action are actually the fundamental basis of reality and the decay of phase entanglement is what drives and unites all force. Since matter decays and force expands, star motion results in a extra vector force called gravitization. Analogous to magnetization due to the motion of charge, gravitization is due to the motion of decaying matter.

          The consciousness of the people resists the recognition of the identity of space and matter Descartes, because they used to think that I live in an empty space - it is convenient for them. While there was no reason to think otherwise. However, there will come a time when the level of education of the people will depend on their understanding of this identity. This requires the necessity to eliminate the difficulties in science. Fundamental should save our thinking, i.e. to be simple and straightforward. For a long time believed that the Foundation for fundamental theories is matter, the amount of which is measured by mass. Once there was a formula of mass - energy equivalence, and mass lost the status of a value characterizing the amount of matter, about it rarely began to remember and physics has lost the Foundation. Any theory of everything is created in such circumstances would not be fundamental. The principle of identity of space and matter of Descartes, according to which physical space is matter and matter is space that moves, gives us the Foundation for fundamental theories.