Wilhelmus,

Great thinking and ideas. Your SSS is nicely consistent with my work and our previous discussions. I also like your elliptical Wheeler 'reality loops' idea in response to QM's 'renouncement of common-sense representations'. (A quote from paper you cited).

But we're both realists. If a common sense cause for all the 'weird' experimental findings emerged Wouldn't you, like me, prefer it? Those findings are based on unproven assumptions so are actually only interpretations!

So consider; A builder (Wheeler-Aspect gmb) fits a round loft window with the pivot vertical not horizontal so wind can opens & shut it & rain enters at some angles = damp ceiling patch (2 days later), small OR large, with little correlation to how much rain. They get roofer & plumber to check carefully but no cause is found. They tell you and the client it's a spooky unphysical effect with no 'common sense' cause.

Would you take their word for it? I suggest not! I didn't either. I went to the loft & experimented by rotating the round frame 180o, and indeed to all angles. I found when open to the east with an east wind & rain it poured in! But not with a WEST wind! - but if rotated again, it did! Then at 90o it either poured in all the time, or if reversed not at all!!

I told the builders but they called me a crackpot as I don't believe nature's weird!

That's exactly what's happened with QM. The experiment in my essay confirms it, being the first to account for ellipticity on all 3 rotational axes, and complementarity between two REAL states over 90o. Absolutely all weirdness evaporates, My 'delayed choice' fig needs no backward causation, it's just an error assuming particulate photon energy and just ONE path. It's just that ellipses only reveal max energy at one orientation!

Do read my essay carefully and see if you understand it. One thing's certain, to the builders of QM I'll be a crackpot, so you may be the only one!

(Remind me to tell you about my recent 'tidewind' finding with some of the Delft lads).

Very best

Peter

    Dear Wilhelmus de Wilde,

    You state "in the so-called space-time... There is NO absolute simultaneity." I wonder why you claim that. Is it to be compatible with the consensus view of special relativity? I'm somewhat confused by your 'backward causation' arguments and multiple worlds discussion. I know this is your second essay to focus on total simultaneity. On page 7 you discuss an area which is the seat of the simultaneity of ALL forms of consciousness. I've read your essay twice and am still somewhat confused about this.

    My own essay treats the history of Einstein's view of simultaneity. I invite you to read it and comment on anything you find relevant.

    Best regards,

    Edwin Eugene Klingman

      Wilhelmus de Wilde,

      You wrote: "In our reality experienced objects are existing sensations."

      I have concluded from my deep research that Nature must have devised the only permanent real structure of the Universe obtainable for the real Universe existed for millions of years before man and his finite complex informational systems ever appeared on earth. The real physical Universe consists only of one single unified VISIBLE infinite surface occurring eternally in one single infinite dimension that am always illuminated mostly by finite non-surface light.

      Joe Fisher, ORCID ID 0000-0003-3988-8687. Unaffiliated

        Joe,

        I can agree with your "one single unified VISIBLE infinite surface occurring eternally in one single infinite dimension" it has direct lines of connection with the mergence out of the Planck Area of what I call "REALITY LOOPS".An infinite amount of "Realities" is emerging from ONE SINGLE infinite dimension, in my perception a "dimension" that we cannot understand. The what you call "NON SURFACE LIGHT" can be seen as what I am calling "CONSCIOUSNESS"

        Wilhelmus de Wilde

        Dear Edwin,

        First of aal my reaction on the comments you have on my essay 5thank you for paying attention to it..)

        "In the so called space-time there is no absolute simultaneity". The so called means "emerging", as it emerges out of the Planck Area where time and space are all simultaneous, only at the border line that I described as vague and full of exitations, all simultaneity is lost once the "reality" emerged. The so emerging "reference frames" are each one differnt from the other which is in accordance with Einsteins relativity theory.

        "Backwards causation" Wheelers delayed choice thought experiment is no longer a thought experiment but has been executed and is a phenomenon that we have to count with. My model can explain it as you have read. I understand that is (like everything in quantum mechanics) a bit strange to get trusted with..

        The confusion that arises when I introduce "Total Consciousness" is understandable. The basic reason for consciousness is the experience and implementation of our emerging reality. In order to realise that we need a "first cause" that I call "INITIATIVE". This first cause cannot originate out of only emergent phenomena. There is of course "causality from emergent phenomena" but then the mergence has already "occurred".

        I also have read your essay and will give a reaction after this one

        Good luck and regards

        Wilhelmus de Wilde

        Dear Wilhelmus,

        I read with great interest your deep analytical essay with important ideas and conclusions aimed at solving the problem of a single "foundation" of knowledge. Only I believe that the "big bang" hypothesis must be subjected to a very deep philosophical doubt in the spirit of Descartes.

        Yours faithfully,

        Vladimir

          Dear Vladimir,

          My "mentioning" of the BB was only a way of explaining the foundationl idea of my model.

          EMERGENCE from a time and spaceless Planck Area to a reality with time and space a beginning of a reeality,that can be compared to the ide's we have right now of the BB, only it is not at all a BANG and not BIG at all,

          it is just a Silent Emergence (SE) of just one of the infinite realities.

          best regards

          Wilhelmus

          Dear Wilhelmus,

          Your essay was a beautiful reading, as you approach with bravery some themes of actuality in fundamental physics. You make interesting connections and propose intriguing ideas. When you commented on my page, I wondered about the connection you made between our essays, I think it is this inseparability, holism. Another theme you approach, which I touched in my previous essays, is that of the apparent ambivalence of causality, as shown in Wheeler's delayed choice experiment. I also liked your emphasis on the Plank area.

          Best wishes,

          Cristi

            Dear Wilhelmus de Wilde,

            While I am familiar with back propagation in neural networks, I wonder if Wheeler's construct of back causation is something new and trustworthy. The word for sunday in Russian language is resurrection. I rather trust in a causality that doesn't loop within a logical circle.

            Could you please tell me by whom and when the expression Planck area was first used? Why didn't you refer to https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Planck_area ? Should I take the time and read your earlier essays?

            Admittedly, I cannot even conceive an Euclidean point of reality, not to mention expressions like eternal probability.

            Perhaps I could better understand your scientific background if you revealed in which department of Delft University you were employed.

            Regards,

            Eckard Blumschein

              Dear Eckhard,

              Wheelers Gedanken experiment is not at all a "new" idea, he proposed it already in 1978. Only in 2007 and 2015 I gave you the link to the paper in my earlier post to you) it was proven. So it seams that our "reality" is far more "strange" as we like to admit. On page 5 of my essay you will find the explanation I gave using the model of FQRL. The causality you favour is still in action , it is just one of the four loops of reality mereging from Total Simultaneity (Planck Area ?).

              The "official" meaning of a Planck Area is the square of the Planck Length, its symbol in physics is Ap. I have to agree with you that the word AREA is not a good one as I mention it also in my essay on page 4 (3.1).

              In my earlier essay The Purpose of Life on illustratio 2 (page 6) and 3(page 7) I gave an idea of the boarder between "REALITY" and the "dimension" it emerged from. The AREA is NOT an Area, and I am thinking about a new term, so thank you for pointing it out to me...

              The Euclidean Point of Reality is an emergent phenomenon (illusion). An Eternal Probability is again beyond this illusionary reality. Probabilities are also available in our Reality, and it depends on which Loop we are choosing (free will) on which probability we will make a memory. All probabilities in our specific reality represent ALL Reality Loops that can emerge from Total Simultaneity. 5 I think I will fall back on this first description of the "area wherfrom realities are emerging.

              I studied Architecture in DElft (title in 1988), which is far from Physics but encourages creative thinking.....When I was 8 years I wanted to go study physics and Einstein was my favorite scientist, till my 12th I added the then available quantum physics as a hobby...and then...my hormons started to win the war and I decided to take a CREATVE art direction : Architecture in DElft. But in the meantime Physics were still my hobby, later on accompanied with ¨Filosophy". I am living since 20 years on a farm far from society in France happily with my wife Corrie.

              So now you know me (a little).

              Best regards

              Wilhelmus

              Dear Chistie

              Thank you very much for reading my essay.

              Indeed holism can be found back in the treatment of the reality loops, what is graphically indicated as a one dimensional line is in fact a four dimensional emerging reality. The only problem with the term "holism" is that it is tending towards the mystical part of reality, and it just that part that You and I want to explain. Also in holography only ONE dimension is added to the two dimensional surface, in my holistic perception we jump from two to four dimensions, and indeed I am still studying thet phenomenon of interference and diffraction.

              best regards

              Wilhelmus

              Dear Wilhelmus,

              An interesting philosophical exploration into the workings of the Universe and our consciousness.

              One question I am left pondering though: you describe traveling on different loops - changing from one to another etc - how is this changing of loops achieved? What causes the change to occur and how is the loop chosen from the many possible loops?

              Regards,

              Declan

                Hi Declan,

                Thank for reading my essay.

                Your question about "travelling" between Loops :

                It could be compared to the MWI interpretation however, realities don't split up in my model. If for instance you have to make a choice between 4 possibilities and you choose n°3 then : Of the 4 loops representing the 4 different realities only the third one continues. The other 3 are staying as probabilities and not as whole realities like in MWI. Another example : If you could go back in time "replace" yourself to a Loop that is in concordance with your memory and existence of your grandfather and decide to kill him in that specific Loop, the reality you experience in your own Loop is continuing incl. the so called time-travel.. The other Loops became probabilities like the one where you did decide not to go on a time travel and the Loops containing all the other probable decisions you had to make. So the moment you are killing your grandfather is not influencing your "existence". It SEEMS as you hopped over but in fact it is only the choice between so the word "travelling" is not the right expression.

                This is also how I explain Free Will.

                Regards

                Wilhelmus

                4 days later

                Dear Wilhelmus,

                It is wonderful that we share common views on consciousness and thinking.

                Your point about an illness such as Alzheimer's affecting consciousness / I is intriguing. I had not thought about it. Does an Alzheimer patient have a different kind of consciousness compared to a healthy person?

                I do have reservations about the Hameroff-Penrose ideas relating to consciousness, because I feel the `gravity induced wave function collapse' hypothesis being applied there first needs to be properly understood / experimentally verified in the context of laboratory physics systems.

                I liked it that you discussed the delayed-choice experiment. In my view, it supports the studies that we do not understand everything about how quantum phenomena relate to the classical flow of time. Something is missing in our understanding of time in quantum mechanics.

                Regarding the recent work of Unruh et al. on quantuum and universal acceleration, kindly also see the views of https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.00138

                Kindly help me understand in what way you are relating Planck area to the search for the `fundamental'? And also the relation between consciousness and Planck area.

                I have enjoyed the variety of ideas presented in your essay, and am glad to notice overlaps with mine.

                My best wishes,

                Tejinder

                  Dear Wilhelmus,

                  I admit that I have not yet given your essay a thorough reading...but while browsing I can see some very interesting notions that you bring in. It is very well written. For example, I agree with your conclusion "The TIME, SPACE and MATTER that we are aware of are only ILLUSIONS". They are akin to the idea of holograms of space and time, and thus vary with any change in the reference frame. So, everything that manifests is simply an illusion - might be a temporary reality for one but illusion for all others. I wonder if the same applies to the so called "consciousness". We may be wrongly describing "consciousness" by the notion of "absoluteness". "Absoluteness" may be a weaker notion and may not be apt to comprehend "consciousness". What do you think?

                  Kind regards,

                  Anil

                  Dear Anil.

                  I agree with you that "absoluteness" is a way for Total Consciousness to "express" itself, and to realise the Completeness tthat I indicate as "Total Simultaneity". Both expressions (Absoluteness and TS) are means to describe the totality of realities that can be experienced by ALL agents of ALL Realities. However these realities are NOTHING when there is no consciousness.

                  I thank you for taking your time to read an comment my essay.

                  rbest regards

                  Wilhelmus

                    Wilhe;mus, your effort has the rare originality of fresh approach. It involves depth in understanding and comprehension of entity called CONSCIOUSNES. I find lot of confusion in the best of top ranking essays that it is being confind to human awareness only. It is in my and your opinion an rntity that exists for ever. In fact the Universe of ours is also ITS brain child if i digress to claim. Our understading of issues differ in words because of our respective cultural background. One need to rise above the self and take a look at one's TRUESELF! How many of us can try such introspection, remains the big Question!

                    I personlly rate your Essay as 9 out of 10 but shall put my ratings towrads the end of the competition, if you are not in a hurry about it.

                    Wilhelmus,your taking a Planck area as a unit to emerge out the 4 dimensional space time reality intrinsicaaly assumes the correctness of founding aspect of QM THEORY THRUGH the uncertainity equivalene. QUANTUM LOOPS ARE BOUND to emerge. Can you digress for me where you introduce CONSCIUOSNESS as an entity to descibe reality or lack of it! I am naive to request you to explain in less abstract manner. that will help provide insight to our understanding of consciousness. I too believe consciousness is tied to the origin of the Universe itself, as it is a pre-existence ever present entitity. Universes can emerge out of it through its cosmic nature!

                    Hi Wilhelmus de Wilde

                    You are wonderfully connecting the singularity of Plank area with consciousness of agent, your words "The incomplete consciousness of an agent in his specific emerging reality is a contribution to the Completeness of Total Consciousness. Emergent phenomena are ILLUSIONS originating from a space and timeless Point : a NOTHING" are really indicative of your superb thinking dear Wilhelmus de Wilde. As you are an independent researcher, you can more freely express your ideas. Probably I am also doing the same.... I highly appreciate your essay and hope for reciprocity.

                    I request you please spend some of the valuable time on Dynamic Universe Model also and give your some of the valuable & esteemed guidance

                    Some of the Main foundational points of Dynamic Universe Model :

                    -No Isotropy

                    -No Homogeneity

                    -No Space-time continuum

                    -Non-uniform density of matter, universe is lumpy

                    -No singularities

                    -No collisions between bodies

                    -No blackholes

                    -No warm holes

                    -No Bigbang

                    -No repulsion between distant Galaxies

                    -Non-empty Universe

                    -No imaginary or negative time axis

                    -No imaginary X, Y, Z axes

                    -No differential and Integral Equations mathematically

                    -No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to GR on any condition

                    -No Creation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models

                    -No many mini Bigbangs

                    -No Missing Mass / Dark matter

                    -No Dark energy

                    -No Bigbang generated CMB detected

                    -No Multi-verses

                    Here:

                    -Accelerating Expanding universe with 33% Blue shifted Galaxies

                    -Newton's Gravitation law works everywhere in the same way

                    -All bodies dynamically moving

                    -All bodies move in dynamic Equilibrium

                    -Closed universe model no light or bodies will go away from universe

                    -Single Universe no baby universes

                    -Time is linear as observed on earth, moving forward only

                    -Independent x,y,z coordinate axes and Time axis no interdependencies between axes..

                    -UGF (Universal Gravitational Force) calculated on every point-mass

                    -Tensors (Linear) used for giving UNIQUE solutions for each time step

                    -Uses everyday physics as achievable by engineering

                    -21000 linear equations are used in an Excel sheet

                    -Computerized calculations uses 16 decimal digit accuracy

                    -Data mining and data warehousing techniques are used for data extraction from large amounts of data.

                    - Many predictions of Dynamic Universe Model came true....Have a look at

                    http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/p/blog-page_15.html

                    I request you to please have a look at my essay also, and give some of your esteemed criticism for your information........

                    Dynamic Universe Model says that the energy in the form of electromagnetic radiation passing grazingly near any gravitating mass changes its in frequency and finally will convert into neutrinos (mass). We all know that there is no experiment or quest in this direction. Energy conversion happens from mass to energy with the famous E=mC2, the other side of this conversion was not thought off. This is a new fundamental prediction by Dynamic Universe Model, a foundational quest in the area of Astrophysics and Cosmology.

                    In accordance with Dynamic Universe Model frequency shift happens on both the sides of spectrum when any electromagnetic radiation passes grazingly near gravitating mass. With this new verification, we will open a new frontier that will unlock a way for formation of the basis for continual Nucleosynthesis (continuous formation of elements) in our Universe. Amount of frequency shift will depend on relative velocity difference. All the papers of author can be downloaded from "http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/ "

                    I request you to please post your reply in my essay also, so that I can get an intimation that you replied

                    Best

                    =snp

                      Dear Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta

                      Thank you for your nice remarks on my contribution.

                      About your DUM :

                      I agree with all the points beginning with NO etc. Why ? Because I think that ALL of them were emergent phenomena in a past that applies to the emergent reality of an alo emergent agent, THEY ARE JUST ONE ILLUSION OF AN INFINITY NUMBER OF REALITY LOOPS. It is the result of time-interperetation of our limited consciousness. That is also the reason that our universe is looking ultimate fine-tuned. It is not useful to create a reality that is not perceived by an agent (in our case the agent is a human being).

                      Your perception of reality is as you say a "singularity free tensor based math model".

                      I can fully agree with that because any singularity will be behind the Planck area, so as an "entity" not part of emerging reality. The "math" part is the part of "thinking" the language of consciousness. I cannot follow you in the math part because mathematics are not my strongest point, but I assume that you will be right.

                      Furthermore my perception is that in your own emergent unique reality this is YOUR finetuned explanation which is TRUE for you. It is YOUR "quantum reality loop". In middle ages there was no quantum mechanics and people had their TRUTH. In a million years when there are conscious agents that have the availability of other different senses and techniques in their OWN LOOP (where our history is placed in) will smile about us and our efforts. But we are both sharing on our Subjective Simultaneity Sphere a lot of the same incoming data. I cannot but agree with the trgee cases you indicated.

                      For ALL the questions that you are answering by DUM, you know already my answers, we are both right....

                      I thank you for a well founded theory, that is is a valuable contribution to our thinking.

                      I esteemed you essay high with a rating and hope that you will do so also with

                      mine .

                      Best regards

                      Wilhelmus