Fundamentals relative to 'The Universe is Otherwise' by Paul Schroeder

Hi Paul, thank you for sharing your views.You cover a lot but I found your essay an easy read. Your revelations that there is no down in space is important but charmingly childlike in the way it is presented. There are places where you have dismissed ideas without presenting an argument. Eg. about finite space and time (mentioning imagination and nonsense) and asserted your own view, the infinity of the universe. Leaving it as an unsupported opinion. I agree with you about there being no holes in existence itself. I like your iceberg analogy very much. Kind regards Georgina

Dear Paul Schroeder,

You accurately wrote: "The universe is absolutely fundamental as it is infinite and there is only one of them."

I have concluded from my deep research that Nature must have devised the only permanent real structure of the Universe obtainable for the real Universe existed for millions of years before man and his finite complex informational systems ever appeared on earth. The real physical Universe consists only of one single unified VISIBLE infinite surface occurring eternally in one single infinite dimension that am always illuminated mostly by finite non-surface light.

Joe Fisher, ORCID ID 0000-0003-3988-8687. Unaffiliated

Hi Paul Schroeder,

your view of finite space time and infinite universe are really good. You are a good mathematician who understands the derived concepts.... Really nice.... dear Paul Schroeder..... I highly appreciate your essay and hope for reciprocity.

I request you please spend some of the valuable time on Dynamic Universe Model also and give your some of the valuable & esteemed guidance

Some of the Main foundational points of Dynamic Universe Model :

-No Isotropy

-No Homogeneity

-No Space-time continuum

-Non-uniform density of matter, universe is lumpy

-No singularities

-No collisions between bodies

-No blackholes

-No warm holes

-No Bigbang

-No repulsion between distant Galaxies

-Non-empty Universe

-No imaginary or negative time axis

-No imaginary X, Y, Z axes

-No differential and Integral Equations mathematically

-No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to GR on any condition

-No Creation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models

-No many mini Bigbangs

-No Missing Mass / Dark matter

-No Dark energy

-No Bigbang generated CMB detected

-No Multi-verses

Here:

-Accelerating Expanding universe with 33% Blue shifted Galaxies

-Newton's Gravitation law works everywhere in the same way

-All bodies dynamically moving

-All bodies move in dynamic Equilibrium

-Closed universe model no light or bodies will go away from universe

-Single Universe no baby universes

-Time is linear as observed on earth, moving forward only

-Independent x,y,z coordinate axes and Time axis no interdependencies between axes..

-UGF (Universal Gravitational Force) calculated on every point-mass

-Tensors (Linear) used for giving UNIQUE solutions for each time step

-Uses everyday physics as achievable by engineering

-21000 linear equations are used in an Excel sheet

-Computerized calculations uses 16 decimal digit accuracy

-Data mining and data warehousing techniques are used for data extraction from large amounts of data.

- Many predictions of Dynamic Universe Model came true....Have a look at

http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/p/blog-page_15.html

I request you to please have a look at my essay also, and give some of your esteemed criticism for your information........

Dynamic Universe Model says that the energy in the form of electromagnetic radiation passing grazingly near any gravitating mass changes its in frequency and finally will convert into neutrinos (mass). We all know that there is no experiment or quest in this direction. Energy conversion happens from mass to energy with the famous E=mC2, the other side of this conversion was not thought off. This is a new fundamental prediction by Dynamic Universe Model, a foundational quest in the area of Astrophysics and Cosmology.

In accordance with Dynamic Universe Model frequency shift happens on both the sides of spectrum when any electromagnetic radiation passes grazingly near gravitating mass. With this new verification, we will open a new frontier that will unlock a way for formation of the basis for continual Nucleosynthesis (continuous formation of elements) in our Universe. Amount of frequency shift will depend on relative velocity difference. All the papers of author can be downloaded from "http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/ "

I request you to please post your reply in my essay also, so that I can get an intimation that you replied

Best

=snp

Dear Fellow Essayists

This will be my final plea for fair treatment.,

FQXI is clearly seeking to find out if there is a fundamental REALITY.

Reliable evidence exists that proves that the surface of the earth was formed millions of years before man and his utterly complex finite informational systems ever appeared on that surface. It logically follows that Nature must have permanently devised the only single physical construct of earth allowable.

All objects, be they solid, liquid, or vaporous have always had a visible surface. This is because the real Universe must consist only of one single unified VISIBLE infinite surface occurring eternally in one single infinite dimension that am always illuminated mostly by finite non-surface light.

Only the truth can set you free.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Dear Paul Schroeder,

Thank you for the kid supporting words......."

Your paper includes a promising new solution to N body motion problems along with a fine relevant history of mass motions and locations. "

............ Your words.........

First off you present frequency shifting in EM radiation. Let's see if I understand your 'EM radiation grazing near mass' by using a different perspective. A photon beam encounters a hydrogen atom in Earth's upper atmosphere. The wave structure of the photon interacts with the hydrogen wave structure, forming a more complex atom which settles lower in the atmosphere. Then another earth grazing photon combines its waves with the more complex atom adding further complexity. This continues until nitrogen, oxygen etc. are formed and the particle falls to earth. Mass is created. This collision process works better when the atom is moving toward the photon as the net motion is slower than c. It is c - u. On the other side of earth fewer interactions arise as the elements are moving away from the photons at speed u. The speed of any combination becomes c u and an atom is less likely to settle before it exits the atmosphere. This mass creation provides equilibrium as recycling occurs with the release by earth of heat and light.

................. Reply ..........

Not exactly that way Paul, a photon hitting atmosphere hydrogen.... cannot alter atomic structure. See my Nucleo Synthsis paper... You can get it from Dynamic Universe model Blog.

..................Your words........................

Note that your close pass issue states frequency increase (red shifted), in your abstract, your introduction and cases 1 &2. This is confusing - inverted shift. The questions you answered within the paper are all about frequencies. But including photons is mostly a side extension of your Dynamic universe model and your formula 25.

.................Reply................

There was this error. FQXi don't change paper, I was on a travel, I posted it hurriedly. I did a correcting abstract after few days on this essay, please see...

Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Jan. 2, 2018 @ 21:58 GMT

.......................your words........................

I do agree with your discussion of creation of mass via extreme blue shifting of light. I also like your dynamic model for masses. You discuss mass rotation and its influence on the flow of other bodies and on the speed of light. You are able with tensors to plot the logical flow of matter via your program SITA which applies rotational drives from N number of masses to an item/group. The program must address many drive factors. You delete dark matter by including all components of N. I arrived at similar thoughts by placing two equal masses near each other. They have to rotate or will be crashed together...................... Reply......................

Correct

.................. Your words....................

The rotations must all be the same - counterclockwise . Opposite rotations will crash. The universe is a counterclockwise whirling flow. We can see it in our solar system. Solar rotation drives planetary revolutions and rotations. Apparent imperfections such as Venus rotation, the moons rotation and the 90 degree tilted axis of rotation of Uranus are explained by factors such as the placement of the rotational force. A most interesting situation is the high latitude small moons of Jupiter which seem to orbit in reverse. Actually they jointly flow in a coiled path. Examining the varying distances from the sun and velocity changes keeps counterclockwise relevant. Can you process this flow near Jupiter in your program?

......................... Reply................

Not yet tried, I am planning to work it out soon.

regards,

=snp

Hello Paul,

I greatly enjoyed your essay and I share some of your opinions about the nature of physical reality, although we disagree on the fine points. The theory I presented at FFP15 also treats gravity as an external force rather than the curvature of space. I just got a post from Avtar Singh, whom I met at CCC-2, reminding me that his ideas also feature a scenario where there is a push resulting from the quantum background and remnants of earlier cosmological eras. In my 'Gravitation by Condensation' I treat gravity as a residual rather than a fundamental force, which explains the title of my essay. But others here, including Bayarsaikhan Choisuren have a view even more similar to yours.

All the Best,

Jonathan

Dear Paul,

I highly appreciate your beautifully written essay.

I completely agree with you.

«for the term gravity, a force originating as a pushing pressure, becomes the fundamental definition. The term gravity should reference the source which is a pushing pressure.

I hope that my modest achievements can be information for reflection for you.

Vladimir Fedorov

https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3080

Dear Paul, ...(copied to your and mine)

Thanks for visiting my FQXi Essay page.

I'm glad that you liked my thoughts. Send your works as you like, you can send it by e-mail fedorovvlad53@gmail.com.

Vladimir Fedorov

https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3080

Dear Paul

If you are looking for another essay to read and rate in the final days of the contest, will you consider mine please?

A couple of days in and semblance of my essay taking form, however the house bound inactivity was wearing me. I had just the remedy, so took off for a solo sail across the bay. In the lea of cove, I had underestimated the open water wind strengths. My sail area overpowered. Ordinarily I would have reduced sail, but this day I felt differently. My contemplations were on the forces of nature, and I was ventured seaward increasingly amongst them. As the wind and the waves rose, my boat came under strain, but I was exhilarated. All the while I considered, how might I communicate the role of natural forces in understanding of the world around us. For they are surely it's central theme.

Beyond my essay's introduction, I place a microscope on the subjects of universal complexity and natural forces. I do so within context that clock operation is driven by Quantum Mechanical forces (atomic and photonic), while clocks also serve measure of General Relativity's effects (spacetime, time dilation). In this respect clocks can be said to possess a split personality, giving them the distinction that they are simultaneously a study in QM, while GR is a study of clocks. The situation stands whereby we have two fundamental theories of the world, but just one world. And we have a singular device which serves study of both those fundamental theories. Two fundamental theories, but one device? Please join me in questioning this circumstance?

My essay goes on to identify natural forces in their universal roles, how they motivate the building of and maintaining complex universal structures and processes. When we look at how star fusion processes sit within a "narrow range of sensitivity" that stars are neither led to explode nor collapse under gravity. We think how lucky we are that the universe is just so. We can also count our lucky stars that the fusion process that marks the birth of a star, also leads to an eruption of photons from its surface. for if they didn't then nebula gas accumulation wouldn't be halted and the star would again be led to collapse.

Could a natural organisation principle have been responsible for fine tuning universal systems? Faced with how lucky we appear to have been, shouldn't we consider this possibility?

For our luck surely didnt run out there, for these photons stream down on earth, liquifying oceans which drive geochemical processes that we "life" are reliant upon. The Earth is made up of elements that possess the chemical potentials that life is entirely dependent upon. Those chemical potentials are not expressed in the absence of water solvency. So again, how amazingly fortunate we are that these chemical potentials exist in the first instance, and additionally within an environment of abundant water solvency such as Earth, able to express these potentials.

My essay is an attempt at something audacious. It questions the fundamental nature of the interaction between space and matter Guv = Tuv, and hypothesizes the equality between space curvature and atomic forces is due to common process. Space gives up an energy potential in exchange for atomic forces in a conversion process, which drives atomic activity. And furthermore, that Baryons only exist because this energy potential of space exists, and is available for exploitation. Baryon characteristics and behaviours, complexity of structure and process might then be explained in terms of being evolved and optimised for this purpose and existence. Removing need for so many layers of extraordinary luck to eventuate our own existence. It attempts an interpretation of the above mentioned stellar processes within these terms, but also extends much further. It shines a light on molecular structure that binds matter together, as potentially being an evolved agency that enhances rigidity and therefor persistence of universal system. We then turn a questioning mind towards Earths unlikely geochemical processes, (for which we living things owe so much) and look at its central theme and propensity for molecular rock forming processes. The existence of chemical potentials and their diverse range of molecular bond forming activities? The abundance of water solvent on Earth, for which many geochemical rock forming processes could not be expressed without? The question of a watery Earth? is then implicated as being part of an evolved system that arose for purpose and reason, alongside the same reason and purpose that molecular bonds and chemical process arose.

By identifying process whereby atomic forces draw a potential from space, we have identified means for their perpetual action, and their ability to deliver perpetual work. Forces drive clocks and clock activity is shown by GR to dilate. My essay details the principle of force dilation and applies it to a universal mystery. My essay raises the possibility, that nature in possession of a natural energy potential, will spontaneously generate a circumstance of Darwinian emergence. It did so on Earth, and perhaps it did so within a wider scope. We learnt how biology generates intricate structure and complexity, and now we learn how it might apply for intricate structure and complexity within universal physical systems.

To steal a phrase from my essay "A world product of evolved optimization".

Best of luck for the conclusion of the contest

Kind regards

Steven Andresen

Darwinian Universal Fundamental Origin