Essay Abstract

Abstract This conscious string theory also called Quantum FFF Theory, (FFF = Function Follows Form) is a semi classical theory based on a symmetrical cold Big Bang evaporation into 8 or 12 CP ( Charge Parity) symmetric copy (anti) material universes. It can be called a semi classical theory because it describes reality by the real collision and shape transformation processes of real sub quantum shaped rigid stringy entangled particles. Each particle is supposed to be conscious by its entanglement with 7 or 11 CP symmetric copy particles located inside the other 7 or 11 CP symmetric universal bubbles at long distance with raspberry shape. The Q-FFF theory is called Semi classical because in addition to the ring shaped transformable rigid string particles, all universal bubbles are assumed to be each others Charge Parity (CP) mirror symmetric universal bubbles which are assumed to be instant entangled down to each individual string particle created out of the Axion Higgs splitting cold Big Bang. So each particle has to compete for wavefunction collapse with 7 or 11 anti copy particles and each person's choice ( free will) also. So: we live inside 8 or 12 quantum particle based instant entangled pinball machines making choices for our own reptile brain based flash intuition down to single particle slit interference. However our frontal cortex seems to be able to make social corrections (Vetos) within 300 msec. The sheer simplicity of such a system is perhaps the reason that I could not find comparable proposals for other theories.

Author Bio

The author's main scientific interests are physics, astronomy and astrophysics anomaly interpretation along new directions out of the box like Qauntum function follows form relations.

Download Essay PDF File

Hi Leo, you mention in your abstract "The sheer simplicity of such a system...". I found even your basic elements complicated.I'll admit I haven't read the whole essay in depth.It is too technical and bizarre for me to concentrate on and extract meaning. I have no doubt a lot of thought has gone into this but applying Occam's razor, a far simpler concoction should suffice. Can it possibly be this complicated? I even see mention of ball lightning and micro comments as black holes. I can relate to that desire for a holistic model but that inclusiveness feels contrived rather than natural to me. Perhaps because I have not been immersed in the same ideas. I like that you start by introducing some of the inspiring ideas you have discovered. There is repetition of a paragraph between point 16 and 17 and after 22 starting "According to Max Tegmark: in an entangled multiverse we may ask: is there COPY PERSON over there, who is reading the same lines as I do?" Thanks for sharing your model. Kind regards Georgina

    thanks Georgina

    you wrote;

    have no doubt a lot of thought has gone into this but applying Occam's razor, a far simpler concoction should suffice. Can it possibly be this complicated? I even see mention of ball lightning and micro comments as black holes very much for your serious section in depth.

    My reaction;

    THE MAIN CHANGES ARE; a new interference black hole,with fermion repelling horizon responsible for e.g.ball lighning.

    second; DUAL PUSHING GRAVITY AN DUAL FEYNMAN DIAGRAMS .

    With these elements physics is able to explain a whole bunch of anomalies

    Hi Leo -You have misquoted me. Also I have noticed a typo in my own comment to you. I meant to say - I even see mention of ball lightning and micro comets as black holes. Not sure how that became 'comments' perhaps it was an unchecked incorrect spellcheck correction. The "very much for your serious section in depth." is your own words included in the quote.

    Are you saying that black holes and duel pushing gravity are fundamental? or that they are fundamental in particular circumstances? How is it the horizon repels fermions, I thought they were gravitational attracted to black holes or are these anti-black holes? How does having the phenomena you mention affect the rest of physics? Kind regards Georgina

    Hi Georgina,

    Thank you for your extensive questions.

    In my model all black holes are Fermion Repelling black holes because fermions are all propeller shaped particles able to keep their nose into their absolute direction through the oscillating vacuum lattice by their entanglement relation in the samethoughts of Bohm and Vigier suggested.

    see perhaps also: http://vixra.org/pdf/1801.0040v2.pdf or my whole refrence list:

    http://vixra.org/author/leo_vuyk

    8: Black Holes produce Plasma direct out of the Higgs field because two rigid massless but

    mutable Higgs particles are convertible into symmetric electron and positron (or even dual

    quark-) propellers (by BH horizon fluctuations)

    ????????????????????????

    Evidence ?

    Sorry, but I do not understand this at all.

      Dear Andrew, for plasma production around BHs see:

      An Alternative Stringy Black Hole nucleus with Entropy Decrease and Plasma Creation.

      http://vixra.org/pdf/1103.0011v3.pdf

      see also: https://www.facebook.com/leo.vuyk?lst=100002068560151%3A100002068560151%3A1516033091

      and:

        and this one: https://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl/

        Dear Leo Vuyk,

        I have concluded from my deep research that Nature must have devised the only permanent real structure of the Universe obtainable for the real Universe existed for millions of years before man and his finite complex informational systems ever appeared on earth. The real physical Universe consists only of one single unified VISIBLE infinite surface occurring eternally in one single infinite dimension that am always illuminated mostly by finite non-surface light.

        Joe Fisher, ORCID ID 0000-0003-3988-8687. Unaffiliated

        I have concluded that the universe is conscious as a whole!see:

        Panpsychism.

        https://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl/2018/01/is-universe-conscious.html

        Dear Leo Vuyk,

        In qualifying the aim of the 'What is Fundamental?' essay contest, Dr. Brendan Foster, the FQXi.org Science Projects Consultant wrote: "We invite interesting and compelling explorations, from detailed worked examples through thoughtful rumination, of the different levels at which nature can be described, and the relations between them.

        Real Nature has never had any abstract finite levels.

        I have concluded from my deep research that Nature must have devised the only permanent real structure of the Universe obtainable for the real Universe existed for millions of years before man and his finite complex informational systems ever appeared on earth. The real physical Universe consists only of one single unified VISIBLE infinite surface occurring eternally in one single infinite dimension that am always illuminated mostly by finite non-surface light.

        Joe Fisher, ORCID ID 0000-0003-3988-8687. Unaffiliated

        Leo,

        Fascinating theory, certainly not overly tied to doctrinal physics! We surely do need such greater imagination to solve problems, as Bell identified. Some may suggest the Netherlands plentiful mind enhancing drugs may have helped! - but I know you have the visionary skills (and perhaps we should all be on drugs anyway!)

        As you may know I keep well up to date on critical branches of science (apart from the 6 week focus on essays). I did go through carefully to try to 'pattern match'. Little did, but as we know most of what we 'know' is false so that may even bode well for your nicely inverse Roe van der Mies FFF! Nice diagrams too.

        If constructively criticising I should comment that the format may have been a little to close to a series of statements than ideal for an essay, and I was hoping for more identification of novel findings and evidence. If you've read my essays you'll know I like stacks of consistent evidence. If I have any suggestion from my own preferences it may be that, though I know you do so a little more in some papers.

        Thanks for that very fresh view. I do hope you understand the important findings in mine (also evidenced by Declan's).

        Very best

        Peter

          6 days later

          To Peter Jackson.

          Hi Peter thanks you for your reaction. I must admit not all Dutchmen grow or blow weed.

          IMHO, " the moon IS there when we stop looking! " because there are other copy moons looking down to every quantum of our moon. HOW?

          According to my Quantum FFF Model, we live inside one of an even set of instant entangled symmetric copy universes. Based on a new particle ( Charge Parity) symmetric Big Bang process.

          See also my essay:

          "22, We seem to live inside one material universal bubble of an instant entangled (Charge Parity Time) CPT symmetric raspberry bubble multiverse. Each quantum jump or wave function collapse or human choice is guided by this instant entanglement at long distant. If our material universes has a chiral oscillating Higgs field, then our material Right Handed DNA helix molecule could be explained. However it also suggests that in our opposing ANTI-MATERIAL multiverse neighbour universe the DNA helix should have a LEFT HANDED spiral.

          Also: according to Max Tegmark: in an entangled multiverse we may ask: is there COPY PERSON over there, who is reading the same lines as I do? If this COPY person is indeed living over there, then even our consciousness should be shared in a sort of DEMOCRATIC form, Then we are not alone with our thoughts and doubts, see: Democratic Free Will in the instant Entangled Multiverse.

          Conclusion, Quantum FFF Theory is based on Non-Local Realism. The CP(T)-symmetrical raspberry shaped multiverse (with 8-12 berries) is non local instant connected down to each quantum. Each quantum can be visualized as a deformed Axion-Higgs ring able to convert into other shapes and able to form compound structures like quarks, muons or even Tau leptons. So realism (cogwheels) connected by symmetric non-local instant entanglement. http://vixra.org/pdf/1401.0071v2.pdf See also: "Democratic Free Will and Telepathy in the Instant Entangled Multiverse." http://vixra.org/pdf/1612.0026v3.pdf "

          An old but extended simple experiment made by Benjamin Libet is able to prove our human VETO statistics as cruxial part of our FREE WILL by our veto freedom..

          See: http://vixra.org/pdf/1704.0003v1.pdf

          Is the Universe Conscious? Yes. However, only at the cost of a mirror symmetric multiverse.

          Experiments for multiverse support:

          1: Bohmian Double Slit Interpretation by Dual Entangled Universes, and the Benjamin Libet Experiment.

          Geplakt uit

          2: Magnetic Monopole Test to Demonstrate the Existence of a Anti Maxwell Dead Zone Around a Current in a Wire.

          Geplakt uit

          3: New Physics by Table Top Experiments.

          Geplakt uit

          4: Quantum FFF Theory Experiments, a Summary.

          Geplakt uit

          5: New Dark Matter Black Holes and a New Dark Energy Higgs Field, Lead to a Bouncing CP Symmetrical Multiverse, and New Experiments.

          Geplakt uit

          6: Experiments to Determine the Mass Related Lightspeed Extinction Volume

          Geplakt uit

          Sorry for the lack of references. see below I hope this will do better.

          Is the Universe Conscious? Yes. However, only at the cost of a mirror symmetric multiverse.

          Experiments for multiverse support:

          1: Bohmian Double Slit Interpretation by Dual Entangled Universes, and the Benjamin Libet Experiment.

          See: http://vixra.org/abs/1704.0047

          2: Magnetic Monopole Test to Demonstrate the Existence of a Anti Maxwell Dead Zone Around a Current in a Wire.

          http://vixra.org/abs/1706.0413

          3: New Physics by Table Top Experiments.

          http://vixra.org/abs/1309.0081

          4: Quantum FFF Theory Experiments, a Summary.

          http://vixra.org/abs/1305.0140

          5: New Dark Matter Black Holes and a New Dark Energy Higgs Field, Lead to a Bouncing CP Symmetrical Multiverse, and New Experiments.

          http://vixra.org/abs/1209.0092

          6: Experiments to Determine the Mass Related Lightspeed Extinction Volume

          http://vixra.org/abs/1102.0056

          To be a bit more prcise you can split the experiments into two groups:

          A: experiments related to the mutiverse

          B related to the new physics of Quantum FFF Theory:

          A: Experiments for multiverse support:

          1: Bohmian Double Slit Interpretation by Dual Entangled Universes, and the Benjamin Libet Experiment.

          See: http://vixra.org/abs/1704.0047

          B: Experiments for New Physics of Quantum FFF Theory ( Function Follows Form)

          2: Magnetic Monopole Test to Demonstrate the Existence of a Anti Maxwell Dead Zone Around a Current in a Wire.

          http://vixra.org/abs/1706.0413

          3: New Physics by Table Top Experiments.

          http://vixra.org/abs/1309.0081

          4: Quantum FFF Theory Experiments, a Summary.

          http://vixra.org/abs/1305.0140

          5: New Dark Matter Black Holes and a New Dark Energy Higgs Field, Lead to a Bouncing CP Symmetrical Multiverse, and New Experiments.

          http://vixra.org/abs/1209.0092

          6: Experiments to Determine the Mass Related Lightspeed Extinction Volume

          http://vixra.org/abs/1102.0056

          Hi Leo Vuyk,

          A very Good idea "This conscious string theory also called Quantum FFF Theory, (FFF = Function Follows Form) is a semi classical theory based on a symmetrical cold Big Bang evaporation into 8 or 12 CP ( Charge Parity) symmetric copy (anti) material universes.".... Dear Leo Vuyk....

          Best wishes or your essay.............. very nice idea.... I highly appreciate your essay and hope you please spend some of the valuable time on Dynamic Universe Model also and give your some of the valuable & esteemed guidance

          Some of the Main foundational points of Dynamic Universe Model :

          -No Isotropy

          -No Homogeneity

          -No Space-time continuum

          -Non-uniform density of matter, universe is lumpy

          -No singularities

          -No collisions between bodies

          -No blackholes

          -No warm holes

          -No Bigbang

          -No repulsion between distant Galaxies

          -Non-empty Universe

          -No imaginary or negative time axis

          -No imaginary X, Y, Z axes

          -No differential and Integral Equations mathematically

          -No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to GR on any condition

          -No Creation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models

          -No many mini Bigbangs

          -No Missing Mass / Dark matter

          -No Dark energy

          -No Bigbang generated CMB detected

          -No Multi-verses

          Here:

          -Accelerating Expanding universe with 33% Blue shifted Galaxies

          -Newton's Gravitation law works everywhere in the same way

          -All bodies dynamically moving

          -All bodies move in dynamic Equilibrium

          -Closed universe model no light or bodies will go away from universe

          -Single Universe no baby universes

          -Time is linear as observed on earth, moving forward only

          -Independent x,y,z coordinate axes and Time axis no interdependencies between axes..

          -UGF (Universal Gravitational Force) calculated on every point-mass

          -Tensors (Linear) used for giving UNIQUE solutions for each time step

          -Uses everyday physics as achievable by engineering

          -21000 linear equations are used in an Excel sheet

          -Computerized calculations uses 16 decimal digit accuracy

          -Data mining and data warehousing techniques are used for data extraction from large amounts of data.

          - Many predictions of Dynamic Universe Model came true....Have a look at

          http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/p/blog-page_15.html

          I request you to please have a look at my essay also, and give some of your esteemed criticism for your information........

          Dynamic Universe Model says that the energy in the form of electromagnetic radiation passing grazingly near any gravitating mass changes its in frequency and finally will convert into neutrinos (mass). We all know that there is no experiment or quest in this direction. Energy conversion happens from mass to energy with the famous E=mC2, the other side of this conversion was not thought off. This is a new fundamental prediction by Dynamic Universe Model, a foundational quest in the area of Astrophysics and Cosmology.

          In accordance with Dynamic Universe Model frequency shift happens on both the sides of spectrum when any electromagnetic radiation passes grazingly near gravitating mass. With this new verification, we will open a new frontier that will unlock a way for formation of the basis for continual Nucleosynthesis (continuous formation of elements) in our Universe. Amount of frequency shift will depend on relative velocity difference. All the papers of author can be downloaded from "http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/ "

          I request you to please post your reply in my essay also, so that I can get an intimation that you replied

          Best

          =snp

          Dear Fellow Essayists

          This will be my final plea for fair treatment.,

          FQXI is clearly seeking to find out if there is a fundamental REALITY.

          Reliable evidence exists that proves that the surface of the earth was formed millions of years before man and his utterly complex finite informational systems ever appeared on that surface. It logically follows that Nature must have permanently devised the only single physical construct of earth allowable.

          All objects, be they solid, liquid, or vaporous have always had a visible surface. This is because the real Universe must consist only of one single unified VISIBLE infinite surface occurring eternally in one single infinite dimension that am always illuminated mostly by finite non-surface light.

          Only the truth can set you free.

          Joe Fisher, Realist

          23 days later

          Dear Leo

          If you are looking for another essay to read and rate in the final days of the contest, will you consider mine please?

          A couple of days in and semblance of my essay taking form, however the house bound inactivity was wearing me. I had just the remedy, so took off for a solo sail across the bay. In the lea of cove, I had underestimated the open water wind strengths. My sail area overpowered. Ordinarily I would have reduced sail, but this day I felt differently. My contemplations were on the forces of nature, and I was ventured seaward increasingly amongst them. As the wind and the waves rose, my boat came under strain, but I was exhilarated. All the while I considered, how might I communicate the role of natural forces in understanding of the world around us. For they are surely it's central theme.

          Beyond my essay's introduction, I place a microscope on the subjects of universal complexity and natural forces. I do so within context that clock operation is driven by Quantum Mechanical forces (atomic and photonic), while clocks also serve measure of General Relativity's effects (spacetime, time dilation). In this respect clocks can be said to possess a split personality, giving them the distinction that they are simultaneously a study in QM, while GR is a study of clocks. The situation stands whereby we have two fundamental theories of the world, but just one world. And we have a singular device which serves study of both those fundamental theories. Two fundamental theories, but one device? Please join me in questioning this circumstance?

          My essay goes on to identify natural forces in their universal roles, how they motivate the building of and maintaining complex universal structures and processes. When we look at how star fusion processes sit within a "narrow range of sensitivity" that stars are neither led to explode nor collapse under gravity. We think how lucky we are that the universe is just so. We can also count our lucky stars that the fusion process that marks the birth of a star, also leads to an eruption of photons from its surface. for if they didn't then nebula gas accumulation wouldn't be halted and the star would again be led to collapse.

          Could a natural organisation principle have been responsible for fine tuning universal systems? Faced with how lucky we appear to have been, shouldn't we consider this possibility?

          For our luck surely didnt run out there, for these photons stream down on earth, liquifying oceans which drive geochemical processes that we "life" are reliant upon. The Earth is made up of elements that possess the chemical potentials that life is entirely dependent upon. Those chemical potentials are not expressed in the absence of water solvency. So again, how amazingly fortunate we are that these chemical potentials exist in the first instance, and additionally within an environment of abundant water solvency such as Earth, able to express these potentials.

          My essay is an attempt at something audacious. It questions the fundamental nature of the interaction between space and matter Guv = Tuv, and hypothesizes the equality between space curvature and atomic forces is due to common process. Space gives up an energy potential in exchange for atomic forces in a conversion process, which drives atomic activity. And furthermore, that Baryons only exist because this energy potential of space exists, and is available for exploitation. Baryon characteristics and behaviours, complexity of structure and process might then be explained in terms of being evolved and optimised for this purpose and existence. Removing need for so many layers of extraordinary luck to eventuate our own existence. It attempts an interpretation of the above mentioned stellar processes within these terms, but also extends much further. It shines a light on molecular structure that binds matter together, as potentially being an evolved agency that enhances rigidity and therefor persistence of universal system. We then turn a questioning mind towards Earths unlikely geochemical processes, (for which we living things owe so much) and look at its central theme and propensity for molecular rock forming processes. The existence of chemical potentials and their diverse range of molecular bond forming activities? The abundance of water solvent on Earth, for which many geochemical rock forming processes could not be expressed without? The question of a watery Earth? is then implicated as being part of an evolved system that arose for purpose and reason, alongside the same reason and purpose that molecular bonds and chemical process arose.

          By identifying process whereby atomic forces draw a potential from space, we have identified means for their perpetual action, and their ability to deliver perpetual work. Forces drive clocks and clock activity is shown by GR to dilate. My essay details the principle of force dilation and applies it to a universal mystery. My essay raises the possibility, that nature in possession of a natural energy potential, will spontaneously generate a circumstance of Darwinian emergence. It did so on Earth, and perhaps it did so within a wider scope. We learnt how biology generates intricate structure and complexity, and now we learn how it might apply for intricate structure and complexity within universal physical systems.

          To steal a phrase from my essay "A world product of evolved optimization".

          Best of luck for the conclusion of the contest

          Kind regards

          Steven Andresen

          Darwinian Universal Fundamental Origin