All fundamental discoveries call for supporting explanation. by Karoly Kehrer

Dear Karoly Kehrer,

Nature produced one single unified VISIBLE infinite surface occurring eternally in one single dimension that am always illuminated by mostly finite non-surface light millions of years before humanly contrived finite complex mathematics ever became evident on earth.

Joe Fisher, Realist.

Dear Karoly,

I think FQXi.org might be trying to find out if there could be a Natural fundamental. I am surprised that so many of the contest's entrants do not appear to know what am fundamental to science, or mathematics, or quantum histrionics.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Karoly,

Excellent concise analysis, Interesting and so nice to read. It didn't need to be long winded as each sentence seemed to be worth a paragraph.

I agree proposed solutions need proper explanation and identification of consistent (and inconsistent) evidence. That's where so many novel proposals here tend to fall short.

I hope you'll read my own which agrees with Poincare and about all you write, plus identifies and explains an important and fundamental ontology and mechanism. Declan Trail's then gives the precise code confirming the hypothesis.

A nice refreshing and uplifting read. Brilliant job.

Peter

Dear Karoly,

An excellent essay - couldn't agree more. My paper on the wave functions of electrons and positrons is the solution that Milo Wolff was seeking to find. It can be found here: http://vixra.org/abs/1507.0054

Also, my essay titled "A Fundamental Misunderstanding" fits in with my paper and your essay in making the compelling case for a Classical Physics solution to the unification of Quantum Mechanics with Relativity.

Best Regards,

Declan Traill

Karoly,

Easy to read and to the point. We use some of the same examples of discovery and suggest the same evolutionary road to discovering what is fundamental. Indeed, "all fundamental discoveries call for supporting explanation. Space vibrations govern the detection of two neutron stars hundreds of millions of light years away, gravity waves and light across the EM spectrum. It is a technique that could take us back to the Big Bang, the original fundamental. Hope you have a chance to check out my essay.

Regards,

Jim Hoover

Karoly,

This is a nice, concise summary of some of the major discoveries of the last hundred years or so. I definitely agree that space and space vibrations are a field needed much more study. I'm also glad to see that Dr. Wolff is still relevant.

Best Regards and Good Luck,

Gary Simpson

quote

The remarkable discoveries by physicist is discussed along with an investigation that tries to find answer of why they really were fundamental. This paper is looking for of how they affected Human thinking - and inspired mankind

end of quote

Again, a very good summary, but why not focus upon the most significant discoveries that actually affected measurement protocols? In this I mean as an example, how say if the universe is speeding up in its expansion , how this would change earlier discoveries and reviews of presumed cosmology.

Aside from that, very good work.

And, do you have anything to say about Dark energy and the so called Dark flow hypothesis ?

Hi Karoly Kehrer

Wonderful words / discussion... "The remarkable discoveries by physicist is discussed along with an investigation that tries to find answer of why they really were fundamental" dear Karoly Kehrer ............. very nice idea.... I highly appreciate your essay and hope for reciprocity you may please spend some of the valuable time on Dynamic Universe Model also and give your some of the valuable & esteemed guidance

Some of the Main foundational points of Dynamic Universe Model :

-No Isotropy

-No Homogeneity

-No Space-time continuum

-Non-uniform density of matter, universe is lumpy

-No singularities

-No collisions between bodies

-No blackholes

-No warm holes

-No Bigbang

-No repulsion between distant Galaxies

-Non-empty Universe

-No imaginary or negative time axis

-No imaginary X, Y, Z axes

-No differential and Integral Equations mathematically

-No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to GR on any condition

-No Creation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models

-No many mini Bigbangs

-No Missing Mass / Dark matter

-No Dark energy

-No Bigbang generated CMB detected

-No Multi-verses

Here:

-Accelerating Expanding universe with 33% Blue shifted Galaxies

-Newton's Gravitation law works everywhere in the same way

-All bodies dynamically moving

-All bodies move in dynamic Equilibrium

-Closed universe model no light or bodies will go away from universe

-Single Universe no baby universes

-Time is linear as observed on earth, moving forward only

-Independent x,y,z coordinate axes and Time axis no interdependencies between axes..

-UGF (Universal Gravitational Force) calculated on every point-mass

-Tensors (Linear) used for giving UNIQUE solutions for each time step

-Uses everyday physics as achievable by engineering

-21000 linear equations are used in an Excel sheet

-Computerized calculations uses 16 decimal digit accuracy

-Data mining and data warehousing techniques are used for data extraction from large amounts of data.

- Many predictions of Dynamic Universe Model came true....Have a look at

http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/p/blog-page_15.html

I request you to please have a look at my essay also, and give some of your esteemed criticism for your information........

Dynamic Universe Model says that the energy in the form of electromagnetic radiation passing grazingly near any gravitating mass changes its in frequency and finally will convert into neutrinos (mass). We all know that there is no experiment or quest in this direction. Energy conversion happens from mass to energy with the famous E=mC2, the other side of this conversion was not thought off. This is a new fundamental prediction by Dynamic Universe Model, a foundational quest in the area of Astrophysics and Cosmology.

In accordance with Dynamic Universe Model frequency shift happens on both the sides of spectrum when any electromagnetic radiation passes grazingly near gravitating mass. With this new verification, we will open a new frontier that will unlock a way for formation of the basis for continual Nucleosynthesis (continuous formation of elements) in our Universe. Amount of frequency shift will depend on relative velocity difference. All the papers of author can be downloaded from "http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/ "

I request you to please post your reply in my essay also, so that I can get an intimation that you replied

Best

=snp

Karoly,

As time grows short, I recheck those that I have commented on to see if I've rated them. I find that I have not rated yours and am correcting that now.

Hope you can get a chance to look at mine.

Jim Hoover

Dear Karoly,

You ask good questions in the spirit of deep Carthusian doubt. You are making an important conclusion for finding a way to overcome the crisis of understanding in fundamental science:

"...we obviously require the explanation of the underlying fundamentals. One candidate may be the understanding of space and the laws governing the space vibration. However the problem we are still facing is that the Universe is infinite so it may require infinite time to find the real fundamental mechanism." My highest score.

It is especially important to develop and support alternative ideas in cosmology . Today, "fundamental science" is dominated by theories without ontological justification (basification). This is a crisis of ontology. We need a new ontology, taking into account the development of knowledge, including tradition, and modern achievements. Today we need a big synthesis of knowledge, a "compression" of knowledge, and the dialectical-ontological construction of a new model of Ideality ... To understand is to "grasp a structure." (G.Gutner, "Ontology of Mathematical Discourse.") I believe that a clue to "grasp" the primordial structure, the ontological structure of space is given by Nature itself, its absolute forms of existence (absolute states).

I invite you to see my ontological ideas .

Yours faithfully,

Vladimir

Dear Karoly,

I highly appreciate your well-written essay in an effort to understand «why they really were fundamental».

It is so close to me. «Vera Rubin noticed in the seventies that the stars in the galaxies do not obey Kepler's well proven fundamental laws. Will this discovery will overthrow what for centuries was thought to be a fundamental phenomena?» «One candidate may be the understanding of space and the laws governing the space vibration».

I hope that my modest achievements can be information for reflection for you.

Vladimir Fedorov

https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3080

Dear Karoly

If you are looking for another essay to read and rate in the final days of the contest, will you consider mine please? I read all essays from those who comment on my page, and if I cant rate an essay highly, then I don't rate them at all. Infact I haven't issued a rating lower that ten. So you have nothing to lose by having me read your essay, and everything to gain.

Beyond my essay's introduction, I place a microscope on the subjects of universal complexity and natural forces. I do so within context that clock operation is driven by Quantum Mechanical forces (atomic and photonic), while clocks also serve measure of General Relativity's effects (spacetime, time dilation). In this respect clocks can be said to possess a split personality, giving them the distinction that they are simultaneously a study in QM, while GR is a study of clocks. The situation stands whereby we have two fundamental theories of the world, but just one world. And we have a singular device which serves study of both those fundamental theories. Two fundamental theories, but one device? Please join me and my essay in questioning this circumstance?

My essay goes on to identify natural forces in their universal roles, how they motivate the building of and maintaining complex universal structures and processes. When we look at how star fusion processes sit within a "narrow range of sensitivity" that stars are neither led to explode nor collapse under gravity. We think how lucky we are that the universe is just so. We can also count our lucky stars that the fusion process that marks the birth of a star, also leads to an eruption of photons from its surface. And again, how lucky we are! for if they didn't then gas accumulation wouldn't be halted and the star would again be led to collapse.

Could a natural organisation principle have been responsible for fine tuning universal systems? Faced with how lucky we appear to have been, shouldn't we consider this possibility?

For our luck surely didnt run out there, for these photons stream down on earth, liquifying oceans which drive geochemical processes that we "life" are reliant upon. The Earth is made up of elements that possess the chemical potentials that life is entirely dependent upon. Those chemical potentials are not expressed in the absence of water solvency. So again, how amazingly fortunate we are that these chemical potentials exist in the first instance, and additionally within an environment of abundant water solvency such as Earth, able to express these potentials.

My essay is attempt of something audacious. It questions the fundamental nature of the interaction between space and matter Guv = Tuv, and hypothesizes the equality between space curvature and atomic forces is due to common process. Space gives up a potential in exchange for atomic forces in a conversion process, which drives atomic activity. And furthermore, that Baryons only exist because this energy potential of space exists and is available for exploitation. Baryon characteristics and behaviours, complexity of structure and process might then be explained in terms of being evolved and optimised for this purpose and existence. Removing need for so many layers of extraordinary luck to eventuate our own existence. It attempts an interpretation of the above mentioned stellar processes within these terms, but also extends much further. It shines a light on molecular structure that binds matter together, as potentially being an evolved agency that enhances rigidity and therefor persistence of universal system. We then turn a questioning mind towards Earths unlikely geochemical processes, (for which we living things owe so much) and look at its central theme and propensity for molecular rock forming processes. The existence of chemical potentials and their diverse range of molecular bond formation activities? The abundance of water solvent on Earth, for which many geochemical rock forming processes could not be expressed without? The question of a watery Earth? is then implicated as being part of an evolved system that arose for purpose and reason, alongside the same reason and purpose that molecular bonds and chemistry processes arose.

By identifying atomic forces as having their origin in space, we have identified how they perpetually act, and deliver work products. Forces drive clocks and clock activity is shown by GR to dilate. My essay details the principle of force dilation and applies it to a universal mystery. My essay raises the possibility, that nature in possession of a natural energy potential, will spontaneously generate a circumstance of Darwinian emergence. It did so on Earth, and perhaps it did so within a wider scope. We learnt how biology generates intricate structure and complexity, and now we learn how it might explain for intricate structure and complexity within universal physical systems.

To steal a phrase from my essay "A world product of evolved optimization".

Best of luck for the conclusion of the contest

Kind regards

Steven Andresen

Darwinian Universal Fundamental Origin

Hi Karoly,

Here are two of your points:

"Gravity is the most universal experience for mankind, so much so we have never even recognized it, until Galileo Galilei and Newton explained its effects, but not its origin." (Einstein refined the explanation but not its origin.)

"One candidate (for foundational) may be the understanding of space and the laws governing the space vibration."

My essay "The thing that is space-time" provides some insight into the origin of gravity, and the origin of relativity. Do take a look.

I appreciate essays by engineers (they have to give good explanations to make things work)....your essay is to the point and clear.

Thanks,

Don Limuti