Respected Prof Jonathan J. Dickau
..............Reply.......
I posted the revised abstract on Jan 2, I was travelling and I posted an earlier essay by mistake. I was in Bhilai for few days then. I know FQXi will not change the essay
.....May please see... sorry for the error....
Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Jan. 2, 2018 @ 21:58 GMT
.............Your words.......
I am sorry to disappoint, Satyavarapu...
..............Reply.......
No disappointment sir, I am trying to understand your nice observations about this model, it is a learning for me....
.............Your words.......
There is some value to various ideas featured in this essay, but it is full of basic errors that seem to reflect a fundamental misunderstanding. Perhaps you have under-estimated the depth of the problem, or perhaps you have some misconceptions about what the endeavor of Physics should be. However; if I was sent this paper as a reviewer for any of the journals where I have been a referee, I would have to say it has some flaws too deep to fix. Academic reviewers often use a three strike rule, where once they see 3 major flaws they will stop reading and if they are kind, they will enumerate those errors.
..............Reply.......
I want to learn the basic errors in this model, you will be pointing out....
.............Your words.......
I read the whole paper, however. So I'll start with the color vs frequency issue; do you realize that blue has a higher frequency than red? In several places; you appear to be saying the opposite. I think you mean that wavelength increases are a red shift while decreasing wavelengths indicate a blue shift. I agree, by the way, that evidence for blue-shifted galaxies is often ignored, and people have the false impression that everything in the cosmos is red-shifted. ..............Reply.......
Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Jan. 2, 2018 @ 21:58 GMT
.............Your words.......
At the 2nd Crisis in Cosmology conference, back in '08; more than one speaker cited blue shift evidence in their talk.
..............Reply.......
Some references please
.............Your words.......
I also agree with your basic premise that gravity can be treated as a kind of frequency shifting phenomenon. There have been a handful of serious academic papers about this, and it is an interesting topic to explore. Unfortunately; a much deeper understanding of things like virtual particles and photons, wave-particle duality, energy of motion, deBroglie wavelength, and so on, is required for a factual treatment of this subject. You come up short.
..............Reply.......
May please see my paper on Nucleosynthesis
https://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.com/p/10-feb-201-6-all-my-published-papers.html
.............Your words.......
I think you got lucky, because I already rated this paper a few days ago, and I was likely more generous than I would be today. Even with some of the deficiencies; it would not be so bad except for the exaggerated claims. But the fact you make such bold promises without a firm basis is offensive.
..............Reply.......
Thank you very much, I am sorry for the mistake done in a hurried way.... I did not intend the post wrong paper...
I did not rate your essay yet, I did not give less than 10 to any one or I refrain rating that essay...
Hope you will read the posting on Jan 2nd.
Hope you will point out some more mistakes... So that I will correct my self...
Thank you for the valuable time you spent on my paper and work...
Thank you for the blessings...
Best Reards
=snp