Discussing on "What Is Fundamental" with Albert Einstein by Christian Corda

An enjoyable read, Christian

I like your discussion with AE and had to laugh when the Unified Field Theory fades before you can read it (I doubt we are anywhere close to such a theory).

A couple questions:

1) If a BH works like an atom and electrons, should there be a 'spectra' of this? I mean like the spectral lines of hydrogen? Could this be verified?

2) Would you say that a BH changes its size in quantum jumps? It would seem, given the analogy provided, that these are not 'tiny' jumps at the particle level, but rather possibly measurable in large units. If so, the question comes up as to how discrete jumps can exist in an otherwise continuous spacetime - or rather how does the 'jump' occur without a continuous change in dimension?

In a different direction, what can be stated about all levels of scale in a BH, between those at the large, BH, scale and those of the quantum particle scale? Do all these other levels not exist, not have any impact on the BH structure, or have we simply not addressed them yet?

Again, a very enjoyable read,

Don

Dear Christian Corda,

I understand your angry reaction as an indication of lacking readiness to accept I might be right when I felt your self-admiration inappropriate among scientists. A good teacher intends teaching as easily understandable as possible.

I ask you to guess: Why did my boss blame a paper of mine as "sowas von" fundamental?

You claimed having proved me wrong in previous contests. Can you please give at least some examples for this? Fortunately FQXi documented all discussions.

What about publishing, I too am a little biased in so far, I tend to not expect accepted work in viXra and Academia. I also refused publishing in GS Journal.

Being not an "anti-relativity boy", I am nonetheless open for hints that may guide to a revelation of possible flaws in non-causal and tenseless models.

With sympathy,

Eckard Blumschein

There persists in all branches of natural philosophy, a societal prejudice which favors the peculiarly human conception of time as being akin to the metronomic pace of Plato's footfalls, and the rhythm of his heart is beating like a drum simultaneously everywhere throughout creation.

Truth is: we can only assume that the rate at which the passage of time occurs

is anywhere between nil and light velocity. jrc

Dear Christian Corda,

I noticed you are with International Institute for Applicable Mathematics and Information Sciences, Adarshnagar, Hyderabad 500063 (India) and also related to uni-frankfurt.de.

By the way does "galilei" instead of galileo indicate you as an outsider? I would appreciate that.

May I hope for your readiness to read, understand, and honestly criticize my definitely uncommon while not lonely arguments concerning very basic fundamentals of mathematics, summarized in my current essay?

I don't denigrate your perhaps excellent publications. Denigrate means to unfair criticize. I criticize that your referenes to own publications are obviously not in any case necessary for someone who intends to understand your answer to the question "What is fundamental?".

When I dared to quote all my eight previous FQXi essays, then each single one directly related to my current essay. In particular, I gave hints to relevant figures.

I have no problems in publishing. What about Einstein's Special Relativity, there are some alternative relativities from Galileo Galilei and Lorentz up to Phipps and Klingman. Let's investigate in all directions. I see Kadin my alley in politics. I just was told, archeology found out, the tropical rain forest in Africa was destroyed for some thousands of years due to local overpopulation.

I look forward reading your criticism on my current essay.

Eckard

I admire you for being a respected Christian in Iran.

Hi Christian

Congratulations on your great score conclusion. I saw you achieve top position, you must have been holding your breath. Didn't stay there but a wonderful result all the same.

Thank you for expressing a willingness to to help me with some technicals. I promise not to abuse this kind offer. My primary interest is to obtain data on velocities displayed within galaxy groups.

Beyond that I would like to have a discussion with you on the following, if you are willing please? To put the terms of my essay in simply summery.

People invented clocks, then Einstein comes along and discovers that clock rates modulate in gravitational environments.

I suggest that, "force drives a clocks function, so forces must be implicated in general relativity's effects". Clock springs redeem this notion as being observable and quantifiable, "force dilation".

Photons being the same type of entity as Gluons. Gluon force gives mass. Dilated Gluon force gives dilated mass. This seams childish in its simplicity, I know. But my essays argument based on mathematical geometry, shows it fits the puzzle of anomalous galaxy velocity. I hope this inspires curiosity. And given the opportunity, I can nail this argument down tighter.

Steve

Again, I look forward reading your criticism on my current essay.

You might also read my comment on Tiainen's horrible essay.

Eckard

Dear Christian Corda,

You still didn't excuse yourself for your mere claim having corrected my "very elementary mistakes in previous FQXi Essay Contests", for your lacking readiness to reveal what you referred to, and for other arrogancies. The positions on top of the community ranking were often changing. Moreover, the panel was so far not obliged to agree with such pretty random ranking. It was you who caused me to rate your essay lower than you expected, and I consider my courageous decision necessary. Maybe, I gave you a 3 or 2, and this might have influenced others.

It was your own exaggerated price-dream bomb that perhaos killed your hope.

I am still ready to accept you as a serious investigator of fundamentals in science, not just as a prolific publicator, if you will surpass yourself, and prove my main arguments wrong, even if I am just a guy for you.

You mentioned "your friends in anti-relativity claims, like Mr. Crothers, Mr. Santilli and others". My eyes are indeed getting weak. I didn't find them here.

Eckard Blumschein