Dear Christian Corda

Just letting you know that I am making a start on reading of your essay, and hope that you might also take a glance over mine please? I look forward to the sharing of thoughtful opinion. Congratulations on your essay rating as it stands, and best of luck for the contest conclusion.

My essay is titled

"Darwinian Universal Fundamental Origin". It stands as a novel test for whether a natural organisational principle can serve a rationale, for emergence of complex systems of physics and cosmology. I will be interested to have my effort judged on both the basis of prospect and of novelty.

Thank you & kind regards

Steven Andresen

    Dear Wayne,

    Thanks for clarifying. I will read your Essay soon.

    Cheers, Ch.

    Dear Jonathan,

    Thanks for your kind words. I am honoured that you find my Essay rather satisfying and quite satisfactory.

    I well remember your perplexity on black hole physics. We also had various discussions with various colleagues. Concerning the existence or non-existences of black holes, I paraphrase Einstein on the existence or non-existences of gravitational waves: "If you ask me whether there are black holes or not, I must answer that I do not know. But it is a highly interesting problem". Also myself hopes that with enough multi-messenger detections the whole zoo of compact objects will someday be known. I also agree on your opinion on the Bekenstein-Hawking equation. That the Mandelbrot set can mimic a BH is interesting and the analogy between and the feedback resistor is very intriguing. The consistence with preserving quantum information is, of course, fundamental. I have seen that any post is now being compacted where every carriage return is replaced by an n. I agree with you that this is awful.

    Again, I wish you good luck in the contest.

    Cheers, Ch.

    Dear Steven, thanks for your kind message. I hope that you will enjoy in reading my Essay. I I look forward to see your comments after that reading. I will read, comment and score your Essay soon. Good luck in the contest. Cheers, Ch.

    Respected Prof Christian Corda

    It is very nice meeting you again FQXi Prof Corda.It is pleasent surprise to know taht You are visiting our city Hyderabad... It is womderful to know that your "gravitational atom" idea goes deep inside in your BH model, very nice thinking and very hard work you did.....

    By the way sir....

    Here in my essay energy to mass conversion is proposed................ yours is very nice essay best wishes .... I highly appreciate hope your essay and hope for reciprocity ....You may please spend some of the valuable time on Dynamic Universe Model also and give your some of the valuable & esteemed guidance

    Some of the Main foundational points of Dynamic Universe Model :

    -No Isotropy

    -No Homogeneity

    -No Space-time continuum

    -Non-uniform density of matter, universe is lumpy

    -No singularities

    -No collisions between bodies

    -No blackholes

    -No warm holes

    -No Bigbang

    -No repulsion between distant Galaxies

    -Non-empty Universe

    -No imaginary or negative time axis

    -No imaginary X, Y, Z axes

    -No differential and Integral Equations mathematically

    -No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to GR on any condition

    -No Creation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models

    -No many mini Bigbangs

    -No Missing Mass / Dark matter

    -No Dark energy

    -No Bigbang generated CMB detected

    -No Multi-verses

    Here:

    -Accelerating Expanding universe with 33% Blue shifted Galaxies

    -Newton's Gravitation law works everywhere in the same way

    -All bodies dynamically moving

    -All bodies move in dynamic Equilibrium

    -Closed universe model no light or bodies will go away from universe

    -Single Universe no baby universes

    -Time is linear as observed on earth, moving forward only

    -Independent x,y,z coordinate axes and Time axis no interdependencies between axes..

    -UGF (Universal Gravitational Force) calculated on every point-mass

    -Tensors (Linear) used for giving UNIQUE solutions for each time step

    -Uses everyday physics as achievable by engineering

    -21000 linear equations are used in an Excel sheet

    -Computerized calculations uses 16 decimal digit accuracy

    -Data mining and data warehousing techniques are used for data extraction from large amounts of data.

    - Many predictions of Dynamic Universe Model came true....Have a look at

    http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/p/blog-page_15.html

    I request you to please have a look at my essay also, and give some of your esteemed criticism for your information........

    Dynamic Universe Model says that the energy in the form of electromagnetic radiation passing grazingly near any gravitating mass changes its in frequency and finally will convert into neutrinos (mass). We all know that there is no experiment or quest in this direction. Energy conversion happens from mass to energy with the famous E=mC2, the other side of this conversion was not thought off. This is a new fundamental prediction by Dynamic Universe Model, a foundational quest in the area of Astrophysics and Cosmology.

    In accordance with Dynamic Universe Model frequency shift happens on both the sides of spectrum when any electromagnetic radiation passes grazingly near gravitating mass. With this new verification, we will open a new frontier that will unlock a way for formation of the basis for continual Nucleosynthesis (continuous formation of elements) in our Universe. Amount of frequency shift will depend on relative velocity difference. All the papers of author can be downloaded from "http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/ "

    I request you to please post your reply in my essay also, so that I can get an intimation that you replied

    Best

    =snp

    Dear Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta, thanks for your kind words. Also for me it is very nice meeting you again here in FQXi Contest. I am happy that you think that my Essay represents a very nice thinking and very hard work. Thanks again. Yes, I visited your nice city Hyderabad some time ago and I am a member of the International Institute for Applicable Mathematics and Information Sciences, which has it is Registered Office in Hyderabad, but is also an Italian-Indian collaboration. Its Director is my friend Prof. B. G. Sidharth. Thanks for signaling your Essay. I will read it soon. Good luck in the Contest! Cheers, Ch.

    Respected prof Christian Corda,

    You are a relativist and say so many good words.... Thank you for those nice words...on Dynamic Universe Model...Your essay is also very good sir....

    I am giving maximum appreciation you for your essay 10... Best wishes for the essay...

    =snp

      Dear Prof Christian Corda

      Your excellent words......

      An interesting point is that you stresses the evidence for blue-shifted galaxies, which is often ignored by mainstream cosmologists. Concerning your point that gravity should be due to frequency shifting, can you explain how this can be reconciled with Einstein's Equivalence Principle, which has today a strong empiric evidence?

      ............... My discussion........

      1. You are correct...Blue shifted Galaxies are ignored by main streem , which are about 33%.... That's nor correct...

      2. I did not say Gravity due to frequency shifting.... Probably Gravity is property of mass and Mass is property of Gravity....

      3. Regarding Einstein's Equivalence Principle, which has today a strong empiric evidence...........

      I want to pose a little observation on earth...

      You might have seen tide waves in sees. High tide will happen in the evenings and mornings every day, is due to SUN's attraction on ocean on earth. On full moon and No moon days, the tide will be higher.... Due to Moon... Standard two body problem cant explain....

      Best wishes for the essay...

      =snp

      Dear Prof Christian Corda

      Your excellent words......

      can you explain how this can be reconciled with Einstein's Equivalence Principle, which has today a strong empiric evidence?

      ............... My discussion........

      3. Regarding Einstein's Equivalence Principle, which has today a strong empiric evidence...........

      I want to pose a little observation on earth...

      You might have seen tide waves in sees. High tide will happen in the evenings and mornings every day, is due to SUN's attraction on ocean on earth. On full moon and No moon days, the tide will be higher.... Due to Moon... Standard two body problem cant explain....

      I will ask the same observation above in some other words........ If we take m Kg mass at the sea level calculate force on that, will that be equalling to m x g ( where g is acceleration due to gravity on earth) ...? Or will we have to add the Gravitational forces of SUN and MOON on a full moon evening.....?

      Best wishes for the essay...

      =snp

        Dear Mr. Corda,

        I found your essay very interesting and original.

        I would be glad if you find a moment to go through my essay, and look forward to a nice discussion on our works.

        Best wishes,

        Flavio

          Christian,

          A clever FQXi tour de force conversation with the Grand Master scientist. Indeed, "Physical theories which permit us to understand Nature can be considered really fundamental." Of course "your legs were shaking," anticipating the theory of everything equation. My essay references anticipation of such a moment in our attempts to simulate (LHC) and indeed seek the BB with an imagined greatly enhanced LIGO detection of the BB. Hope you get a chance to read my essay.

          Wishes for a challenging contest.

          Jim Hoover

            Hi Christian,

            1. Thanks for your link on the universe as a black hole ... very informative. Thanks!

            2. In this essay I attempted to show how mass curves space-time by creating density gradients of gravitons.

            I would also like to develop an understanding on why the speed of light is the same for all observers. My postulate is that light can only go "piggyback" on top of "gravitons". The net of gravitons that is space-time is an "ether" connecting everything in the universe. When objects move on this net the gravitons change their relative distances but the speed of light piggyback on the gravitons remains c!

            In other words gravity in the form of gravitons keeps the speed of light constant for objects that move with respect to each other. Michelson and Morley showed that a static background ether did not exist ..... but they never considered the ether being a graviton net.

            What do you think? Too crazy....

            Theorizing is easy ... good experiments are the hard part.

            Don Limuti

            Dear Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta,

            Thanks for giving the highest score to my Essay. I am grateful to you and honored by this.

            Thanks for clarifying points 1, 2 and 3. Concerning Einstein's Equivalence Principle, its main consequence is that gravity is not a force. It is inertia instead.

            Thanks again and good luck in the Contest!

            Cheers, Ch.

            Dear Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta,

            Please, give a look to my above reply. Concerning to your question, it depends on the reference frame we chose.

            Cheers, Ch.

            Dear Flavio,

            Thanks for finding my Essay very interesting and original. I will read, comment and score your Essay soon.

            Thanks again and good luck in the Contest!

            Cheers, Ch.

            Hi Jim,

            It is pleasant meeting you here in FQXi again.

            Thanks for finding my work clever.

            I often worked on gravitational waves due to the BB in the past. Thus, it will be my pleasure reading, scoring and commenting your Essay soon.

            Thanks again and good luck in the Contest!

            Cheers, Ch.

            Hi Christian,

            I rated your essay February 2. Highest, of course.

            There's so much of substance here, that I don't know where to begin commenting. So let me choose one area -- your equations 1 & 2. Whatever the units, entropy has not been seen to decrease on its own, and Bekenstein-Hawking are expected to lead with that premise for black hole surfaces of not less than 2 dimensions.

            Bekenstein-Mayo, however (https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0105055) in their one-dimensional black hole picture, used Pendry's formula for 1 channel entropy flow (their equation 6) to show that it does not differ in form from their eqn. 10, leading one to conclude " ... a black hole in 3-D space is more like a 1-D channel than like a surface in 3-D space. We have checked that these conclusions are not qualitatively changed when the entropy is carried by neutrinos." Thus my suggested neutrino experiment, eliminating the distinction between past and future entropy. Soliton waves pass through each other regardless of origin.

            Thanks for reading and commenting on my essay.

            All best,

            Tom

              5 days later

              Dear Christian;

              I am so proud to be friend with someone who is in such a good relationship with doctor Einstein and above all the entanglement you found from the interior of "the Heaven of Scientists" and its exterior outside the its event horizon, so the information of the inside of this heaven has become available for us in our emerged reality. I quite understand the reason why he wanted to see you, once the bridge was opened because the model you are developing is quite harmonious both for the mind and for the maths.

              A Heaven of Scientists is already a long sought for the reason to find solutions about the origins and development of our experienced reality. The big question of course "Is there a beginning as introduced by the BB theory or is the HoF just eternal? I don't think the BB is relevant, but who am I? I neither like singularities in our emergent reality. The expansion theory may explain the cosmic background radiation, but it is the same kind of solution as the MWI asserting the objective reality of the universal wave-function...

              "the countable character of subsequent emissions of Hawking quanta", is one of the conclusions you are taking in the comparing of the BH with a hydrogen atom. Indeed the electron cloud around a nucleus of an atom can be compared to the BH Hawking radiation, only the difference is that a nucleus is not the origin of the energy state of the electron-cloud, or am I understanding you quite wrong here? Because on page 7 you say " BHs cannot strictly emit thermally" but also "backreaction" is the origin of fluctuations in the event horizon, together with the Hawking radiation it means that any BH is sending out quite some energy. Does this mean that "Herr Doktor" could not be a thermal emission? Could we interfere with him, could you have written this essay?

              "BH evaporation is time-dependent." Is it time dependent only on our emergent reality, and maybe not with reference to the inside the BH "structure? This opens indeed the question of the question of BH space-time. "If "there is an "entanglement structure of the wave function associated with the particle pair creation (outside -inside entanglement ), the time structure is also entangled with the inside of the BH and this explains "the emitted radiation results have to be entangled with BH QNMs, which represent the electron states of the gravitational atom" and indeed you could accept that: "a BH is a well-defined quantum mechanical systems with an ordered, discrete quantum spectrum".(The "Herr Doctor" has time consciousness and so it can be reached)

              "Rigorous mathematical details of my solution to this part of the BH information paradox can be found in a couple of papers of mine" I think that the information paradox is no longer a paradox once you are implementing my own model of the "Foundational Quantum Reality Loops" in my essay. I really loved reading your creational interview with Grand Master Einstein and hope that you can submit him my contribution to this fuzzy FQXi contest and ask his opinion, remarks and maybe rating. At this side of the HoS I rate your interview as high as possible being aware that the FQXi professionals won't be impressed (but I am).

              Best regards

              Wilhelmus de Wilde.

                Dear Christian Corda,

                Einstein was right when he did not agree with the EPR experiment conclusions and had said, "spooky action at a distance" cannot occur and that, "God does not play dice". Please read Linear Polarization http://vixra.org/pdf/1303.0174v5.pdf

                I also request you to read my essay on wave-particle and electron spin at: https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3145 or https://fqxi.org/data/essay-contest-files/Rajpal_1306.0141v3.pdf

                Kamal Rajpal