"Fundamental" means the underlying principles, laws, essence, structure, constants and properties of matter by Vladimir N. Fedorov

Dear Wilhelmus, ...(copied to your and mine)

Many thanks warm words about my work and for mutual understanding.

I wish you happiness in your scientific work in search of truth.

Vladimir Fedorov

https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3080

Dear Corciovei,

(copy to yours and mine)

Many thanks for the kind words about my work and for mutual understanding. The understanding and appreciation are highly valued.

I highly appreciate your well-written essay in an effort to understand.

I wish you happiness in your scientific work in search of truth.

I hope that my modest achievements can be information for reflection for you.

Vladimir Fedorov

https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3080

Dear Jack,

(copy to yours and mine)

Many thanks for the kind words about my work and for mutual understanding.

The understanding and appreciation are highly valued.

I wish you happiness in your scientific work in search of truth.

Vladimir Fedorov

https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3080

Dear Don,

(copy to yours and mine)

Many thanks for the kind words about my work and for mutual understanding.

Understanding, respect and your advices are highly valued.

I wish you happiness in your scientific work in search of truth.

Vladimir Fedorov

https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3080

Dear Gary,

(copy to yours and mine)

Many thanks for the kind words about my work and for mutual understanding.

The understanding and appreciation are highly valued.

I wish you happiness in your scientific work in search of truth.

Vladimir Fedorov

https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3080

Dear Christian,

(copy to yours and mine)

Many thanks for the kind words, interest shown in my work and for excellent questions.

You wrote: «Beyond your Essay, I am interested on your device for the detection of gravitational waves. Can you give me some detail?»

Brief description of the experiment can be read in my Research notebook «The deterministic gravitational waves» https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VMlesBfYVVa-Fp6bIr1I-uzU-Vnq3FFY/view pages 53-60.

I will tell only the history of the experiment that in 2006 I read a lot about the gravitational waves of LIGO and I had an idea that gravitational waves from stars can be recorded with the help of the Casimir effect on the surfaces of bodies. Then I hung on a torsion balance a package of many sheets of writing paper between framed by frames of the same paper. I assumed that such a package should be a similarity to a gravitational telescope with a flat radiation pattern, and signals from stars should be repeated every day, but I did not see it. But what I saw turned all my ideas about physics.

When I processed the data and plotted the graph for 2 weeks of measurement https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1MvF-AefpMmOWx2SkE0ZjJXTG8/view , I realized that some neutrino matter is registered from the eastern quadrature of the Earth's orbit, obviously those detected by Michelson and Morley.

I assembled the second installation, where I placed just a packet of writing paper without frames. There were practically no variations. But when I replaced it with a package with frames, I got the same variations of large amplitude as in the first setup. Those. The package of paper with frames was approximately 100 times more efficient when receiving gravitational waves than a packet without frames.

The most vivid impression of observations on the monitor in real time was stable periodic signals of large amplitude with a period of 72 seconds. For me it was a enigma. I thought I was on the verge of a great discovery. It is now known to us that such the periodic signals of 72 seconds are recorded in the LISA project in million kilometers from the Earth. This is now I brought in the essay the simple relationships for the calculation, in practice, of all possible resonance frequencies of gravitational waves.

These experiments were not intended for publication, they were for me.

So, I realized that:

1. Gravitons exist. Flows of gravitons can be focused and manage them.

2. Gravitational waves can be easily registred with the help of packets of parallel planar bodies. X-ray telescopes can easily be converted into gravitational telescopes.

3. The space is filled with neutrino rigid and superfluid matter.

4. The Earth does not fall from the orbit, not because space is empty, but because there is a toroidal gravitational wave in orbit that pushes the Earth along orbit from the eastern quadrature of the orbit, compensating for the resistance.

I understood many other interesting points.

It is difficult to persuade people. Stimulus can only be the desire to know the truth.

You wrote «that the abstract distortion of space-time is equivalent to a non-ideal medium of the physical vacuum-the variable velocity of propagation of the gravitational fundamental interaction. But, if it is equivalent, how can be also an incorrect use of ideals properties? Equivalent means that we have two ways to interpret a phenomenon and that both of them are correct».

Yes, formally, they «that both of them are correct» - the result of the calculations is the same.

For example, the force of gravitation on Earth can be calculated through the gravitational coefficient (the empirical form of recording the law of gravitation), but can be calculated by the physical form, through the gravitational potential, which has the dimension of the square of the velocity.

However, very few people know the very simple truth that the gravitational potential is equal to the square of the equilibrium orbital velocity. And, practically, no one knows that the equilibrium orbital velocity is equal to the change in the speed of propagation of the gravitational interaction, which is equivalent to the derivative of spatial coordinates in time (to the formal equivalent - to the distortion of space-time in general relativity). Mechanisms are different - the result is one.

For example, the speed of propagation of gravitational interaction increases from the surface of the Earth to the periphery of its gravisphere. Near the surface of the Earth, the speed of propagation of gravitational interaction is on 8 km/s less than on the periphery of the gravisphere. Gravitons in toroidal gravitational waves accelerating near the surface of the Earth form the reactive force of gravity for terrestrial bodies.

You wrote «that the abstract distortion of space-time is equivalent to a non-ideal medium of the physical vacuum-the variable velocity of propagation of the gravitational fundamental interaction. But, if it is equivalent, how can be also an incorrect use of ideals properties? Equivalent means that we have two ways to interpret a phenomenon and that both of them are correct».

I can quote Valery Morozov: "The formulation of the energy-momentum parameters of a gravitational field in general relativity can not be a tensor, but it is a pseudotensor, a quantity that transforms as a tensor only under linear coordinate transformations. This means that in GRT the energy of the gravitational field can not in principle be localized (which follows from the weak equivalence principle). Various authors introduce their own energy-momentum pseudotensors of the gravitational field, which possess certain "correct" properties, but one their variety shows that the problem does not have a satisfactory solution".

However, these problems are not mine, but GRT, dig into mathematics, and not in physical mechanisms. I have nothing against the very principle of equivalence. The force of gravitation and the force of inertia have a single mechanism of action. My conclusions are based on a comparison of facts that can be observed, and on phenomena that have analogs around us.

In my essay 2017, I clearly demonstrated in the example of phenomena in space that there is, assumedly, the only mechanism for the formation of force with the help of toroidal gravitational waves, which minimize the force of gravitation and inertia.

The gravitational field in a toroidal gravitational wave is a vortex of the medium of a physical vacuum. I suppose the solar system is a vortex of a medium of a physical vacuum with spherical equipotential surfaces having the same speed of rotation and same gravitational potential. Despite the fact that the Earth in orbit is not moving relative to the medium of the physical vacuum, the large vortex gravisphere of the Earth has a resistance.

However, the gravisphere of Earth in orbit is in the potential well of stability of the orbital soliton gravitational wave, which pushes the Earth along of orbit and compensates for the resistance force.

The gradient of the gravitational potential of the orbital wave is equal to the gradient of the gravitational potential in the region of the Earth's orbit in the solar system and is directed in the opposite direction. Therefore, the forces of gravity of the Earth to the Sun and the forces of its inertia do not exist

On the tides, you can see my answer to the question of Peter Jackson.

If the force of attraction was, the Earth would emit X-ray radiation of enormous power in accordance with the Unruh effect, but the Earth does not radiate, and the comets radiate, because they are attracted to the Sun.

By most powerful X-ray radiation 1 GW was possessed by a small comet Hyakutake, which moved around the Sun against the motion of the planets.

For comparison, Jupiter, which is in a circular orbit, has the same power of 1 GW X-ray as Comet Hyakutake, although the masses of these bodies are not comparable.

Consequently, GRT and Newton's law of gravitation are not valid for orbital bodies. Those. these laws are not fundamental, they are valid only for the surface of the Sun, the surfaces of planets and satellites in the solar system. Fundamental is the assertion that all fundamental interactions have potential stability pits, and are easily combined by a single formalism.

I wish you happiness in your scientific work in search of truth.

Vladimir Fedorov

https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3080

Dear Branko,

(copy to yours and mine)

Thanks for visiting my FQXi Essay page.

Each of our work is valuable in that it is information for thought.

I do not exclude the fact that the gravitational constant is valid for many stars, for example, for all yellow dwarfs. But I have doubts about other classes of stars, because they are in other quantum states and can reflect other levels of matter with a different gravitational coefficient.

I'm against using the gravitational coefficient everywhere. I proposed a formula for calculating it, to check whether can be used it to the system in question or not.

I wish you happiness in your scientific work in search of truth.

Vladimir Fedorov

https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3080

Dear Ulla,

(copy to yours and mine)

Your essay and comments allowed to consider us like-minded people.

Like me, you think about very interesting questions «The interesting question is what happens in the vacuum, or at its boundary, and what forms our space + time».

In my essay it is shown that all the force interactions of the elements of matter are carried out at resonance frequencies of toroidal gravitational waves. In the universe, there is a general grid of resonant frequencies of limiting elements (such as an electron), which synchronizes all quantum parametric processes), so time is a derivative of the period of synchronous resonance frequencies and cannot be distorted.

It is known that on the surface of the flat bodies there is Casimir effect, which, as I explain, is associated with the presence of turbulent gravitational shell and large gradient of the gravitational potential.

The bodies are attracted to each other on the Earth because there is a turbulent gravitational shell near the surface of the Earth.

I wish you happiness in your scientific work in search of truth.

Vladimir Fedorov

https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3080

Dear Steven,

Thank you very much for writing me a message.

Excuse me for being short-sighted, I refrained from communicating with you after your categorical statement in 2017.

«These topics being prominent in the minds of people, evidences the complexity and fine tuning problem is a most pressing issue confronting our universal awareness. No matter we try, it will not find explanation in absence of a natural organisation principle!».

I consider that I am one of the few who answered the question posed about the self-organization of matter even in the title of my essay.

It is so close to me.

«Questions of a fundamental nature of the world push up against our theories of Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity».

«It does indeed appear we exist as a world of matter fields of force, operating under temporal governance».

In my essay it is shown that all the force interactions of the elements of matter are carried out at resonance frequencies of toroidal gravitational waves. In the universe, there is a general grid of resonant frequencies of limiting elements (such as an electron), which synchronizes all quantum parametric processes), so time is a derivative of the period of synchronous resonance frequencies and cannot be distorted.

«MOND having achieved prediction of spiral galaxy rotation velocities, the same formula fails to extend prediction to motions of galaxy groups. If a single fudge factor fixed everything, it might tell us something important. But it's difficult to justify a unique fudge to suit numerous unique examples of gravitational interaction».

«a unique fudge to suit numerous unique examples of gravitational interaction». are explained very simply. Due to the invariable gravitational potential in the disks of galaxies, the stars move approximately at the same speed, which does not correspond to Newton's law of gravitation and Kepler's laws.

I think that the overwhelming majority of scientists do not assume that the gravitational potential is equal to the square of the equilibrium orbital velocity, because all are accustomed to consider the gravitational potential through the gravitational coefficient, which, in my opinion, is not fundamental.

In addition, the gravitational potential is related to the temperature of the medium of the physical vacuum (analog of "dark matter"). And the temperature in the galactic disk is approximately the same, so the speed of the stars does not depend on the distance to the center of the galaxy.

I highly appreciate hope your essay and hope for reciprocity ....

I request you to please post your reply in my essay also, so that I can get an intimation that you replied.

I highly appreciate your well-written essay in an effort to understand.

I hope that my modest achievements can be information for reflection for you.

Vladimir Fedorov

https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3080

Dear Brajesh,

(copy to yours and mine)

Thanks for the kind words and advice. «I would suggest you to subsequently develop your ideas for people who are from non-science background».

I wish you happiness in your scientific work in search of truth.

Vladimir Fedorov

https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3080