Gordon:
Response to your question of 15 Feb.'15
Q1: The older term I used was "the one universe principle" and its corollary that the universe is fractal. Therefore, the quantum world should have analogs in the Newtonian world without weirdness. In addition: since we learn from birth many characteristics of our scale, these become instinctual - more: they become the very definition of what is logical.
Q2: The [AAD] is meant to show that "AAD" will mean "action-at-a-distance" in the paper. So, 2 of the things Bell's inequality showed was (1) AAD does not happen -was impossible, and (2) local interactions did not happen. Note "local" is here defined as less than or equal to the speed of light (see later questions). I think it's common to put definitions and symbols in parentheses immediately after the word. I don't understand what you expected to see there?
Q3 experiments should guide the physics models/theories and the appropriate math should be used.
The photon model with the math:
The initial which showed how incoherent became coherent. However, although the slit simulations were encourging, the trace of photon paths left something to be improved.
Photon diffraction and interference
IntellectualArchive, Vol.1, No. 3, P. 31, ISSN 1929-4700, Toronto, July 2012
http://intellectualarchive.com/?link=item&id=597
improved math simulation
Single Photon diffraction and interference http://intellectualarchive.com/?link=item&id=1557
Light diffraction experiments that confirm the STOE model and reject all other models
http://intellectualarchive.com/?link=item&id=1578
some evolution of the model happened
video based on this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A07bogzzMEI
Diffraction experiment and its STOE photon simulation program rejects wave models of light
IntellectualArchive, Vol.4, No. 6, P.11 , ISSN 1929-4700, Toronto, Jan. 2014
http://intellectualarchive.com/?link=item&id=1603
Hodge Experiment distinguishes between wave and particle caused diffraction patterns
IntellectualArchive, Vol.5, No. 3, P. 7, ISSN 1929-4700, Toronto, Jan. 2014
http://intellectualarchive.com/?link=item&id=1712
STOE assumptions that model particle diffraction and that replaces QM
IntellectualArchive, Vol.5, No. 3, P.1 , ISSN 1929-4700, Toronto, Jan. 2014
http://intellectualarchive.com/?link=item&id=1719
another video based on this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A07bogzzMEI
Hodge experiment (continued) of interference with a slit in a transparent mask rejects wave models of light
IntellectualArchive, Vol.6, No. 5,
http://intellectualarchive.com/?link=item&id=1862
Hodge experiment (continued) with opaque strips and about the Afshar Experiment
IntellectualArchive, Vol.6, No. 6,
http://intellectualarchive.com/?link=item&id=1872
Q4: Conventional math does deliver with the unconventional STOE physics postulates. Little about the STOE physics postulates is conventional.
Q5: The model is that all matter interactions are through the plenum and that the plenum wave effect is faster tha light ( faster than light means non-local). Therefore, any experiment performed involves an influence the happens at faster than light speed.
Q6: ? sure if you wish. But my meaning uses instantaneous in the simulation as an approximation. I see little difference in what we can measure between 10^7 c and instantaneous except to say that infinite speed like infinite anything is physically disallowed in the STOE. When the math yields an infinity, something is wrong with the math or the model.
However, diffraction observations on solar system or galactic scale may be possible where speed of gravity would be important. We have to think about what to look for.
Thanks for the query.
Hodge