Hi Kamal L Rajpal Ji

Very nice fundamental discussion ... "An isolated static electron in free space is not a fixed particle at rest. It is always oscillating in a SHM in its own electromagnetic inertia field, rest frame even at zero kelvin temperature. This is non-thermal, standing wave, resonance Compton frequency, oscillation along a linear path or, along an elliptical or a circular (clockwise or anti-clockwise) path which results in the electron's intrinsic magnetic moment (spin up or spin down). ..........."

I hope you will not mind that I am not following main stream physics...

By the way...Here in my essay energy to mass conversion is proposed................ yours is very nice essay best wishes .... I highly appreciate hope your essay ....You may please spend some of the valuable time on Dynamic Universe Model also and give your some of the valuable & esteemed guidance

Some of the Main foundational points of Dynamic Universe Model :

-No Isotropy

-No Homogeneity

-No Space-time continuum

-Non-uniform density of matter, universe is lumpy

-No singularities

-No collisions between bodies

-No blackholes

-No warm holes

-No Bigbang

-No repulsion between distant Galaxies

-Non-empty Universe

-No imaginary or negative time axis

-No imaginary X, Y, Z axes

-No differential and Integral Equations mathematically

-No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to GR on any condition

-No Creation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models

-No many mini Bigbangs

-No Missing Mass / Dark matter

-No Dark energy

-No Bigbang generated CMB detected

-No Multi-verses

Here:

-Accelerating Expanding universe with 33% Blue shifted Galaxies

-Newton's Gravitation law works everywhere in the same way

-All bodies dynamically moving

-All bodies move in dynamic Equilibrium

-Closed universe model no light or bodies will go away from universe

-Single Universe no baby universes

-Time is linear as observed on earth, moving forward only

-Independent x,y,z coordinate axes and Time axis no interdependencies between axes..

-UGF (Universal Gravitational Force) calculated on every point-mass

-Tensors (Linear) used for giving UNIQUE solutions for each time step

-Uses everyday physics as achievable by engineering

-21000 linear equations are used in an Excel sheet

-Computerized calculations uses 16 decimal digit accuracy

-Data mining and data warehousing techniques are used for data extraction from large amounts of data.

- Many predictions of Dynamic Universe Model came true....Have a look at

http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/p/blog-page_15.html

I request you to please have a look at my essay also, and give some of your esteemed criticism for your information........

Dynamic Universe Model says that the energy in the form of electromagnetic radiation passing grazingly near any gravitating mass changes its in frequency and finally will convert into neutrinos (mass). We all know that there is no experiment or quest in this direction. Energy conversion happens from mass to energy with the famous E=mC2, the other side of this conversion was not thought off. This is a new fundamental prediction by Dynamic Universe Model, a foundational quest in the area of Astrophysics and Cosmology.

In accordance with Dynamic Universe Model frequency shift happens on both the sides of spectrum when any electromagnetic radiation passes grazingly near gravitating mass. With this new verification, we will open a new frontier that will unlock a way for formation of the basis for continual Nucleosynthesis (continuous formation of elements) in our Universe. Amount of frequency shift will depend on relative velocity difference. All the papers of author can be downloaded from "http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/ "

I request you to please post your reply in my essay also, so that I can get an intimation that you replied

Best

=snp

    Dear Kamal L Rajpal,

    Thanks for your comments in my Essay page and for inviting me to read your Essay.

    You wrote a nice Essay, despite it is a bit speculative. You indeed released new insights on a quantum object, the electron, that it is not still completely understood. In my Essay, I describe the "electron" of the "gravitational atom" as being the oscillations of the black hole event horizon. Till now, I have only applied a semi-classical approach without considering spins. Maybe you Essay could be a guide for my future, more detailed analyses.

    In any case, your Essay was a pleasant reading. It deserves my highest score. Good luck in the Contest!

    Cheers, Ch.

    Kamal,

    That is an interesting description of a particular, basic aspect of quantum mechanics.Though I'm not a viable expert on QM.

    Kamal

    Good work, fundamental, well conceived written and illustrated. Pencilled in for a high score. Perhaps not entirely complete and maybe with the odd flaw but those are not scoring matters, and common to all theory! I also analyse the electron and have done in past papers.

    Have you analysed the 3-axis OAM components of rotation yet? I use a similar model to yours and find a 'way in' to a clssic description of QM from electrons in static fields (polarisers etc) which rotate with field direction.

    I think you'll like my essay. (see also Declan Traill's code and plot).

    Well done for yours.

    Very Best

    Peter

    Kamal,

    Thanks for reading and commenting on my essay.

    I have not been schooled in electron motion but do wonder about different simple harmonic motions (shm) of electrons in different atoms -- non-hydrogen with more than 1 electron or molecules electoral-statically impacted by adjoined electrons in other atoms. What is fundamental in all environments? We all contribute in this difficult question of fundamentalism and can help one another.

    Jim Hoover

    Dear Kamal

    You wrote on my thread that "Quantum Mechanics claims that an electron can be both spin-up and spin-down at the same time. In my conceptual physics Essay on Electron Spin, I have proved that this is not true." And you gave references to some of your papers.

    I have read your contest paper and your vixra paper on electron spin. I note that you referred to zbw or zitterbewegung in your vixra paper. Your attribution of SHM motion to the electron seems to fit nicely with zbw.

    I also do not believe that an electron can be simultaneously spin up and down at the same time. But, in my preon model, parts of an electron can be spin up and parts can be spin down simultaneously. But it is a simple count of spin up and down parts which determines the net spin. A higgs field/particle will contain an equal number of components with up and down spins.

    Just as the quantum chiral spin of an electron does not mean that an electron is spinning like a top, the preons, or components, in an electron are also not simply spinning like a top. Chiral quantum spin seems to be inherent in the smallest parts of an electron, in the fashion of a fractal property. It is present no matter how far you zoom in.

    Best wishes

    Austin Fearnley

    Kamal,

    Made it as promised. Electron spin is indeed very important. Interesting read and ideas. Did you see Peter Jacksons electron model; allowing OAM and additional; vector states with the Poincare sphere, demystifying QM and the usual confusion like in Austins post above.

    Well done.

    Best

    Richard

    Hi Kamal,

    Thanks for your essay on the electron, a particle that is so basic and yet so elusive. I also consider an electron at rest an impossibility.

    My own essay is a rather non-standard view of space-time and gravity. Do take a look.

    Thanks for your essay,

    Don Limuti

    Dear Rajpal

    I agree many points including;

    "The electron rest mass is equivalent to the energy of a photon of wavelength equal to the electron Compton wavelength. An analysis of the oscillating electron is also given by Petr Beckmann [1]".

    I believe de Broglie and Compton wavelengths tells some important effect about the matter ratios namely, ratio between electron and photon.

    Here you may read,

    my essay

    Kind regards

    Bashir

    Kamal,

    I post here not above as it's easier to find. Thanks for your kind comment on mine on 16th & viXra link which I'll follow after scoring. (Your little boost was my score). Well done.

    Best of luck in the run in.

    Peter

    I think all of my criticism also applies to the Vixra paper.

    I would add some comments about the section 11.0. The Dirac equation isn't a valid wavefunction equation. The ZB arises because the equations misleading mixtures positive and negative energy solutions. The Dirac equation is correctly interpreted as an identity for the fermion field operator in field theory, and the normal ordering procedure separates positive and negative solutions, eliminating all ZB components.

    Hestenes' work is incorrect.

    Write a Reply...