Essay Abstract
In the process of analyzing a large number of experimental facts and astronomical observations, two fundamental properties of gravitation were found. It is about the primary properties of gravitation, which ultimately form a large variety of its manifestations. The obtained results became the basis for creating an alternative theory of gravitation.
Author Bio
Hometown: Almetyevsk Alma mater: Kazan University
A little over a century ago, a fairly large number of questions addressed to the physicist could be answered that this is electricity. Today, many questions can be answered: it is gravitation. Indeed, gravitation has penetrated almost all branches of physics, including special relativity, optics, particle physics, quantum physics and high-energy physics. The degree of penetration is so great that the scope of relativity can completely go over into the scope of gravitation. This is convincingly shown in this essay. It is usually assumed that gravitation is nothing more than gravitational forces and these are the weakest forces from the four known interactions. In reality, gravitation has a sufficiently large number of different manifestations and the observed effect of gravitational forces is just one of many consequences from two fundamental gravitational effects. Another known gravitational phenomenon - gravitational refraction of light is also a derivative from the more fundamental effects. More details are presented in the essay.
Best wishes,
Robert Sadykov
The speed of light is a fundamental? How will You answer this question if You learn that the speed of light is completely formed by gravitation? All details are presented in the essay.
Best wishes,
Robert Sadykov
Reliable evidence exists that proves that the surface of the earth was formed millions of years before man and his utterly complex finite informational systems ever appeared on that surface. It logically follows that Nature must have permanently devised the only single physical construct of earth allowable.
All objects, be they solid, liquid, or vaporous have always had a visible surface. This is because the real Universe must consist only of one single unified VISIBLE infinite surface occurring eternally in one single infinite dimension that am always illuminated mostly by finite non-surface light.
Only the truth can set you free.
Joe Fisher, Realist
It is very difficult to imagine anything without energy. But, what is more fundamental - the potential or kinetic energy? Maybe they are equally fundamental? The answers to these questions are contained in the essay.
Seeing that the surface of the earth was formed millions of years before man and his complex finite informational systems ever appeared on that surface, it logically follows that Nature must have permanently devised the only single physical construct of the real visible Universe allowable.
..........
Joe Fisher, Realist
What is more fundamental - time or movement? The answer received in this essay as a consequence may seem somewhat unexpected.
It is usually assumed that gravitation is nothing more than gravitational forces and these are the weakest forces from the four known interactions
In the special theory of relativity, the dilation of time has a strictly symmetrical character. However, in reality, this symmetry is violated. The reason for the violation is shown in the essay and this is certainly gravitation.
Dear Prof Robert D. Sadykov
You have nicely analyzed the two fundamental properties of gravitation in the light of STR and GTR... Telling that Gravitational Bending of light is a fundamental property of light... Have a look at my alternative theory of gravitation..... "Dynamic Universe Model" also.
I hope you will not mind that I am not following main stream physics...
By the way...Here in my essay energy to mass conversion is proposed................ yours is very nice essay best wishes .... I highly appreciate hope your essay ....You may please spend some of the valuable time on Dynamic Universe Model also and give your some of the valuable & esteemed guidance
Some of the Main foundational points of Dynamic Universe Model :
-No Isotropy
-No Homogeneity
-No Space-time continuum
-Non-uniform density of matter, universe is lumpy
-No singularities
-No collisions between bodies
-No blackholes
-No warm holes
-No Bigbang
-No repulsion between distant Galaxies
-Non-empty Universe
-No imaginary or negative time axis
-No imaginary X, Y, Z axes
-No differential and Integral Equations mathematically
-No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to GR on any condition
-No Creation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models
-No many mini Bigbangs
-No Missing Mass / Dark matter
-No Dark energy
-No Bigbang generated CMB detected
-No Multi-verses
Here:
-Accelerating Expanding universe with 33% Blue shifted Galaxies
-Newton's Gravitation law works everywhere in the same way
-All bodies dynamically moving
-All bodies move in dynamic Equilibrium
-Closed universe model no light or bodies will go away from universe
-Single Universe no baby universes
-Time is linear as observed on earth, moving forward only
-Independent x,y,z coordinate axes and Time axis no interdependencies between axes..
-UGF (Universal Gravitational Force) calculated on every point-mass
-Tensors (Linear) used for giving UNIQUE solutions for each time step
-Uses everyday physics as achievable by engineering
-21000 linear equations are used in an Excel sheet
-Computerized calculations uses 16 decimal digit accuracy
-Data mining and data warehousing techniques are used for data extraction from large amounts of data.
- Many predictions of Dynamic Universe Model came true....Have a look at
http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/p/blog-page_15.html
I request you to please have a look at my essay also, and give some of your esteemed criticism for your information........
Dynamic Universe Model says that the energy in the form of electromagnetic radiation passing grazingly near any gravitating mass changes its in frequency and finally will convert into neutrinos (mass). We all know that there is no experiment or quest in this direction. Energy conversion happens from mass to energy with the famous E=mC2, the other side of this conversion was not thought off. This is a new fundamental prediction by Dynamic Universe Model, a foundational quest in the area of Astrophysics and Cosmology.
In accordance with Dynamic Universe Model frequency shift happens on both the sides of spectrum when any electromagnetic radiation passes grazingly near gravitating mass. With this new verification, we will open a new frontier that will unlock a way for formation of the basis for continual Nucleosynthesis (continuous formation of elements) in our Universe. Amount of frequency shift will depend on relative velocity difference. All the papers of author can be downloaded from "http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/ "
I request you to please post your reply in my essay also, so that I can get an intimation that you replied
Best
=snp
Dear S.N.P. Gupta,
I thank You for your comment. I will certainly read your essay.
Best wishes,
Robert Sadykov
Dear Very Nice Essay ,
I gave you 10, previously it was 5 now it is 7.5
best wishes
=snp
Dear Robert Sadykov, Considering movement photon's in gravitational field, you come to conclusion: "The conclusion is that kinetic energy is themost fundamental form of energy and any potential energy, including the internal energy of particles, is ahidden form of kinetic energy " In the New Cartesian Physics shown, that formula mass - energy equivalence occurs from pressures Universe's. Your reasonings not suffice identities spaces and matters Descartes'. When Copernicus began to assert that the Earth revolves around the Sun, he had, according to Descartes, to add that along with the Earth around the Sun, the entire circumsolar space rotates. Look at my essay, FQXi Fundamental in New Cartesian Physics by Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich Where I showed how radically the physics can change if it follows this principle. Evaluate and leave your comment there. I highly value your essay; however, I'll give you a rating after becoming acquainted with the Descartes' idea. Do not allow New Cartesian Physics go away into nothingness, which wants to be the theory of everything OO.
Sincerely, Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich.
Time is synonymous of motion total.
Dear Robert Sadykov
Your essay is very intresting topic. I think we agree many points, concerning the Nature of Gravity and Photon.
"gravitation has a sufficiently large number of different manifestations and the observed effect of gravitational forces is just one of many consequences from two fundamental gravitational effects." Which I agree.
Here is my essay that I think you may be Interested, and I would like your comments.
https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3143
Best wishes
Bashir
Dear Robert Sadykov,
Thank you for a fascinating essay. Your diagrams are clear and well described in the text. While not completely compatible, our essays complement each other; we both consider photons in local gravity. For example, what you term the "gravi-kinetic" effect is represented in eqn (1) in my essay. I appreciated your mention of the Sagnac experiment as demonstrating constancy of the speed of light relative to the earth. This constancy predicts the null results of the Michelson-Morley experiment.
In my essay I argue against length contraction (see my reference 10) which I believe you may represent as "gravi-contraction". Since you do not discuss the associated wavelengths of the photons, I wonder if 'gravi-contraction' is equivalent to changes in wavelength of the photon? I hope you will extend your theory to cover photon wavelengths.
We also discuss "the dilation of local time". In my essay I reinterpret time-dilation from Einstein's space-time symmetry to an energy-time principle that is based on changes in energy. This seems to be compatible with your energy-based model. You note in a comment above that "the dilation of time has a strictly symmetrical character", but, in reality, the symmetry is violated. I agree 100%, as this is seen in the Global Positioning Sysytem.
We are led to the same conclusions, such as that light emitted from an accelerated proton is constant relative to the earth, but not relative to the proton.
Finally, while our particular models differ somewhat, I agree with you that kinetic energy is the most fundamental form of energy and provides the basis of mass.
Thank you for a fascinating and excellent essay. I hope you will read my essay and comment on it.
My very best regards,
Edwin Eugene Klingman
Dear Boris Dizhechko,
On the key points, I fully agree with You. Indeed, space has a certain set of physical properties and therefore it is matter or substance. Of course, the properties of this substance are different from the properties, for example, of an electron. But the available properties are sufficient for the recognition of space as a substance. Gravity as a phenomenon in one way or another is related to the properties of space. Regarding energy. If any potential energy is a hidden form of kinetic energy, then any substance that has its own energy must consist of structures or elements that have zero rest mass and are moving at the speed of light. For example, an electron can be a ring-shaped closed string that has zero rest mass and rotating at the speed of light. Under these conditions, the zero mass of the string forms the usual non-zero mass of the electron. Other implementations are also possible, but some kind of movement or - in your terminology - vortices should be. I give You a high rating.
Best wishes,
Robert Sadykov
Dear Robert Sadykov from your essay shows that you study the gravitational field very seriously and professionally. In New Cartesian Physics there are two forces: the pressure force of the Universe and the centrifugal force of rotation of the physical space. The other force is a combination of both.
I wish you success, Dizhechko Boris
Dear Edwin Klingman,
In nature, everything is interconnected and, of course, time is connected with energy. Besides, time is associated with inertia, momentum, movement and space. The question is what connections are short and direct, and which are indirect? Let us consider these connections on the example of an electron. If the internal energy of an electron is kinetic energy, then any point that is part of the electron has zero rest mass and moves at the speed of light. The zero mass of points in a closed volume forms a nonzero mass of the electron. Here the points are very conditional definition - these can be any structures with nonzero dimensions. The motion of points inside an electron is an internal process of an electron. This motion causes a continuous change in the state of the electron, since each point continuously changes its spatial coordinates. The change in the state of the electron forms the proper time of the electron. Now imagine that the gravitational field has one single property - the action on the speed of light, and the smaller the distance to the central mass, the speed of light is less. Let the electron be placed in a gravitational field. In this case, all processes inside the electron slow down in proportion to the decrease in the local speed of light and this leads to a dilation of the electron proper time. In the case of an electron moving relative to the central mass, the average rate of processes inside the electron is additionally slowed down and this leads to an additional expansion of the electron proper time. Both forms of time dilation are observed in the GPS satellite system. In reality, the gravitational field has not one but two fundamental properties, and the combined action of these properties causes various adventures for the electron, including its gravitational acceleration. More details are shown in the essay.
The length contraction caused by gravity can be discussed in the future. Here I note that the rate of time flow in different frames of reference can differ very much, but any two events that are simultaneous in one reference frame are also simultaneous in any other reference frame. So, I give You a high rating.
Best wishes,
Robert Sadykov
Dear Bashir Yusuf,
I will definitely find time to read and comment on your essay.
Best wishes,
Robert Sadykov
