Joe you are a source of perplexity. You seem oblivious to the significance of the solution I have provided. Dispelling the paradoxes of relativity while still allowing there to be non simultaneity of observed events but also allowing unambiguous sequential foundational passage of time. Your own "revelation" does not fit with mainstream physics and does not provide solutions to specific problems in physics.
You use the phrase real visible structure. Yet the 'universe' you describe does not permit the process of vision to occur. There are lots of different things to consider, perception, visual products, sensory stimuli and the potential sensory information received, and material objects and particles, sources of the potential sensory information they reflect or emit allowing transmission from source to observer.
I have recently watched a video called 'Mind the gap' about the difference between perception and external reality. Perception being an interpretation formed from sensory inputs and application of prior learning. We do not experience what 'is there' but a reasonable supposition of the possible causes of the inputs received. That is why we can come up with such different conclusions about how the universe functions, and have different experiences of the same events..
While two equally useful explanations can be ranked so that the simplest is probably more likely correct, two explanations, one of which solves multiple problems and the other does not can not be usefully ranked using their simplicity. They need to be ranked according to usefulness. I am not seeking peace of mind in the certain knowledge of being a part of an infinite surface, and so your explanation is of no use to me, nor, I should think, anyone else concerned about the physics of the universe(s) we (humankind) inhabit physically and mentally.