The Nature of Time

...You are lucky to have a Ulla; take good care of here. My Lucie is just that and still after 42 years. We had a bubble/party yesterday with my 3 sons and 3 grandchildren.. That's what a grandfathers day job is about...

Marcel,

Yes indeed I am lucky , I take care of her, I love her a lot, I have immigrated 11 months ago, she is happy also with me, we have the same tastes in life, we are in all humility persons universal and altruist and so we are on the same wave lenght, that helps, we are happy with our animals, sheeps, goats, hens, porcs and all our plants in this forest, we live a happy life, she has 4 children , I wish all the best in your life and a happy life with your familly like grandfather, me unfortunally I have lost all my familly, mother,father, godfather , grandmother are dead, my mother 5 years agon, my godfather a suicide 3 years ago and my grandmother 2 years ago, I am alone with two dogs I was in a kind of depression and so sad, here in finland with Ulla I am a little bit better because my life has been very difficult even when I was a child, I was even adapted and I have known this at the funeral of my mother, my father drunk when I was young and was odd with my mother , he is dead when I was 19 years old, I have been educated in the street also with my friends, more a coma at the age of 21 due to epilepsy when I was at university in second in geology I have stopped it before the third because it was difficult after , it needs one year to be better, I take meds now and it is better, I am sometimes sad due to this past but I am better here with ulla, take care,

lol I write too quickly, adopted , not adapted :)

If you read carefully my poster... you know there are no particles.... just waves, linear or circular. This is 50 years lost looking for little balls, point particles etc. Yet, QM says all is made of waves! Where did the maths go wrong? As for the spheres, I believe they are Wheeler's quantum foam. An initiator creates the sphere centered on (our) h/2 Planck; it breaks into eight quadrants, each quadrant acting as initiator of more spheres. A process Spontaneous and generating = explosive. The BB was just the beginning of a process still happening right now which we call time. We live in it and are made of it. The universe does not Exist per se; it happens.

MM

We cannot affirm you know, you consider before the hypothetical BB and infinite heat and so after you have considered the photons and their oscillations and so thhat the waves and fields create our reality, it is an assumption, you cannot affirm and for me the particles coded are a better explaination because we can have particles without fields but not the opposite, the problem seems philosophical, I beleive that the main problem is the fashion of strings and a problem of interpretation of the waves particles duality, the fields and waves like main origin futhermore have a big philosophical problem considering the evolution because why we evolve ? and why the oscillations cannot stop the sufferings or others if a thing exists beyond our understanding, my model respects the waves particles duality because these 3D spheres are in motions ortations but oscillate also, but like I told, qwe cannot affirm , nobody can affirm, when we affirm these things it is not a humble compiortment because we need proofs, the waves , fields like origin of all are not proved simply , so maybe you could try to ptove your idea and try also to consider these coded particles and the supermatter that I have explained in this central sphere, it is this the secret for me and the 3 main series of coded 3D spheres

I insist on the fact that we cannot affirm but we must prove, when we affirm assumptions, it is odd for me, we must dpoubt and try to prove and doubt even about our philosophy , because nobody knows the truth, nor about God or not, nor about the primordial origin of this physicality nor about the foundamental objects, I have remarked that the philosophy of fields, waves like origin come from simply this, the thinkers have considered an infinite heat before this BB and after they oscillate it simply and after so they create the fractalisations with the geom alg of this reality and its topologies, geometries, matters and fields, it is an assumption simply because we don t know if this infinite eternal energy is a heat or a consciousness or others and how this thing that we cannoty define transform and code the E to create this universe, we must be humble and we cannot affirm even if we are all persuaded, we must recognise that we don t know simply, if we affirm, it is a vanitious comportment

the BB also is an assumption even if we have some interestinmg datas about the CMB and the inflation but we cannot affirm simply still, furthermore there are problems philosophical still about the fact to consider only photons like primoridal essence. We need a deeper logic superimposed to balance all our actual model and its electromagnetism and heat, see well my humble reasoning that I don t affirm about this cold dark matter encoded and permitting to balance

You know dear Marcel, I know that it is not easy to doubt and change a line of reasoning because we are humans not perfects and that we are all persuaded and inside the sciences community lol it is probably the most vanitious community on this earth, but a sure thing even if we are all persuaded is that we can just accept the proved laws, axioms , equations and never we can affirm things not proved by rigourous mathematical proofs or experiments, if we affirm when it is not proved, so we are not deterministic thinkers, I am sorry but it is a fact, you cannot affirm that the waves are the main origin and that the particles don t exist, it is for me odd and just in your head, you must like all prove what you affirm, I make the same for my theory ands these spheres, I don t affirm and I try to prove. We can discuss of course and share ideas but we cannot affirm these deep unknowns, we cannot make this because if we make it, we nourrish simply our vanity and we lie also

In fact in resume we can have our philosophy or others, but after all who are we to affirm assumptions ? we cannot do this, the same when we speak about the main essence of this universe, have we a kind of god of spinoza or are we from a mathematical accident or others? we don t know, that is why we cannot affirm and we can just discuss in respect about these things without concluding things that we cannot explain, the same for the waves or particles like main essence or others assumptions. I repeat but nobody knows this universal truth and a thinker affirming assumptions is simply a person too mucgh vanitious thinking he has understood the universal mechanics better than the others, Hawking considered no god, einstein considered a gdd like newton, Max Tegmark consider a mathematical universe, others have their own thoughts but nobody know the truth, I consider personally an infinite eternal consciousness, an energy that we cannot define creating this universe but I don t affirm even if I am persuaded in having generalised the sciences and my encoded informations, we are limited in knowledges and proofs simply and we must accept this with humility, never we can affirm things not proved, it is only simple than this

Steve,

I got your message. So, let`s add IMHO. Still, no particles. The quadrant diagram system shows perfect parity across h/2, structure and charge signs. This explains why quarks can't be isolated.. they are wave quadrants, not particles. It shows, it does not prove... But Quark masses do not add up to the mass of the nucleons..

It is like all the proof are there in the long troubles they have had with both quarks and the magnetic monopole.

Consider this; I posted at CERN Youtube and Perimeter Institute Youtube. There are others people posting all sorts of theories .. they are still there. My posts where removed or not published (moderated off). There could be lots of reasons for this, but then it begs the question. Why?

...model removed... There are many Nobel prizes and billions spent on the Standard Model... It is not a model that will make people happy... given its ridiculous simplicity... Lets take it as a theory, an educated suggestion. There are many concepts all at once, given for this synthesis.

1- vacuum is Time

2- Planck is a maximum allowed amplitude of time rate variation

3- magnetic field is time rate variation

4- electric field is a line alonh which the time rate changes of direction.

5- particles are ring waves with specific coupling rules

6- energy on a dynamic time background is power

7- electron is the magnetic monopole

8- a unit electrical charge is 4 E lines

they are all integrated into one wave model.

The diagram system works well with pair annihilation/ pair creation/ neutron>proton anti eV / etc. The causality is in the structures > conservation laws.

Think about it for 2 seconds. The electron is not a little ball with an electric charge stuck to it.

It is the unit electrical lines charge connected to the structure that generates it by induction, the corresponding unit magnetic charge, the magnetic monopole. The electron is the smallest "particle" and it is just that, a single monopole. IMHO

I understand what you tell, but the nobel prizes or field medal or others are always given after a proved work mathematically or by experiments. Einstein has had his nobel for a work about the photoelectric effects and not for the GR and SR, the same for Wittem he has had the field medal for a works concrete in maths about the fields, but after the people confound their prizes witht heir models , that is why all are focused on this GR and photons only and the strings, but they are theories not proved , even if there are several relevances. A lot of money indeed is spent for these researchs because we try to find and explain our main unknowns and when they are found, it permits the investments in new technologies, it is the main aim of lobbies and investors in fact. I beleive that there are a lot of confusions at this moment inside the theoretical sciences community, we have an ocean of models and it is important also to tell that it is more difficult now to explain these deepe unknowns than 100 years ago when Borh, einstein, planck and the others were together searching to complete this standard model. Your ideas and model is very interesting and general , and like all you must prove whjat you tell. I see that you are general even if I see differently I respect your ideas, I beleive strongly that the particles like main origin is foundamental ,but it is an assumption also like yours.I see that you consider mainly this time like the main peice of puzzle, probably due to an interpretation of this spacetime luminiferous of Einsteain and its GR and SR , but like I said, I see this time correlated with the rotating 3D spehres and the velocities and irreversible also , we must differenciate at my opinion the observations relativistic with the real time in the pure mechanics. The time seems a parameter emergent due to these motions and objects , the quaternions can be interesting in considering a pure 3D and this time for the rotations , but it does not seem to be a real dimension, it is an emergent porperty of duration correlated probably with the evolution, because without time we have no evolution and no matters , so the motions become the key. Your coupling ring idea is interesting and could converge with the motions of these finite series of 3D spheres , even the exchanges can be inserted and the quasiparticles , imagine a hopf fibration on surfaces of these 3D spheres for the quasiparticles and the virtual particles....

Like dirac said , we don t know what is really an electron, we cannot still affirm what they are and why they have their properties, Dirac and Feynman have worked about this, and even they have considered antiparticles differently, one consider a kind of negative energy , the other considered a backward time

for me it is a serie of 3D pshres having merged due to a serie for the space the main codes and two fuels, the cold DM andf the photons, that permits to create their properties because they become simply what they must become, they are not a single sphere but a serie, and their properties appear due to this fusion of 3 main series, I don t consider these fields and waves like primoridal origin, I consider the particles giving the properties, they distribute their fields and energies in function of their intrinsic codes simply in this space and due to these two fuels, these fuels permit to balance the cahrges but explain also the negentropy entropy, the +, the heat cold, the gravitation electeromagnetism, this and that, we need a balance at all scales .....

See that we need an universal balance, see now the relevance if the 3D spheres are a reality at all scales with the senses of rotations....

see also that these magnetic monopoles are hypothetical particles and correlated with the superstrings still and the branes, for me even If I respect these theories, they are not foundamental and we have no extradimensions of 1D to 11D and no monopole, it comes from these 1D strings still and the photons like main essence and origin, you know , it seems odd to consider the waves, fields like main origin instead of particles coded, like I explained these strings have a big philosophical problems, we can make all the maths that we want that will not change that these strings, branes have many problems, maybe the thinkers must forget this prison of strings and GR and go deeper in considering particles coded simply

Marcel,

I get what you are saying, and again the difficulty lies in the limitations on what we can make observable. Steve is also correct to a degree and his fascination with (idealized, original spatial configuration) spherical representation of reality is not inconsistent with your paradigm.

Where I think it can come together is where we imagine energy condensing to a matter state which exhibits physical properties such that the task is to reach consensus on definition of qualitative, ontological terms that might provide a quantitative model for "why" induction of the magnetic moment occurs. And thus arive at a general definition rather than an experimental definition of electric charge. What IS it? ... energy of course, and at greater density than the same continuously connected energy that exhibits the characteristics primarily of magnetism.

How might we imagine the behavior of energy gravitationally bound (hypothetical for sake of ideal modeling) in a self-limiting free rest mass? Given the paradigm of an isolate quantity forming a FRM condensate, let's propose that the primary force effects are manifest as the conjugates of the tendency of energy to decelerate inwardly to concentrate energy quantity and conserve space in an energy super-saturate universe --- and the tendency of energy to accelerate towards light velocity outwardly to fill space.

We now com to the expediency provisional by both SR and GR; that if energy accelerates outwardly to the relativistic limit, then it is the rate of time that is existant at light velocity and the simply connected energy across a range of density variation in the FRM need not, nor cannot, be in any state of motion itself at the gravitational limit boundary of some empirically derived universal minimum density.

So what's Time got to do with it at the other end of density variation in the condensate FRM? Would not the inverse be true? ... that the rate of time slows towards nil at some empirical upper density limit as energy "stacks up on itself" exponentially under the ontology of gravitational deceleration. (i.e.) Time doesn't 'stop' at light velocity, only the observation of it because light velocity is the limit to which time can go.

So at the electron's center there might be an inelastic density core outward of which is a lower density spherical measurement boundary we associate with electrical characteristics. BUT that doesn't mean that the condensate doesn't continue to use up a tiny bit of the total mass quantity of energy interior to the measurement boundary of inelastic density and the upper density limit might approach a density where Time physically stops. Hence: not even physical rotation (motion) is necessary for there be a difference in state of motion to produce induction!

Best Wishes, jrc

Hi John, all this is interesting, about the energy, all is there, how is transformed this E and what is the main source creating these topologies, geometries and properties, , the problem seems philosophical, if the thinkers think that we are inside an infinite energy of heat and that this thing so oscillate, so we understand its distributions, but this energy can be also inside particles and distributed .... all is there, how is the matter energy transformations and thr main codes , is it fields, waves or particles , is it an energy creating the matters of a matter liberating this energy, you can so understand why I consider a central cosmological sphere where this Eis coded and transformed in matter and after distributed but we cannot affirm like I said but all seem there between these two main primoridal origin. I am fascinated by these spheres indeed philosophically , I have found this theory in ranking a little bit of all, chmistry, biology, animals, vegetals, minerals, maths, physics and in a page of biology I have seen the evolution of brains since the lemurians and we see also a spherisation relative of these brains, I told me wowww the universe and particles also are spheres probably, why this chpoice, why this sphape, I don t know, maybe simply it is like that , they are the perfect equilibrium of forces, they permit the optimised motions, they have no angle and permit to create with deformations all geometries, this shapes seem the choice of this universe and even the gravitation is correlated, why our eyes, are spherical, why the planets, stars, moons, BHs, waves, a water drop, the glands, the virus, why the favorite sports of humans also, because it is like this simply , if the thinkers think in a god of Spinoza like Einstein, why this thing that we cannot define has created this shpae, maybe in concentrating during an eternity this energy in a sphere and after in creating this physicality simply, why ? I don t know, maybe it is like this, God was alone lol maybe and so we create a physicality , for me this central cosmological sphere is fascinating and is the begining of all and it is there that all informations and codes are sent and continue to send furthermore due to evolution, it is the meaning of my theory of spherisation, an optimisation evolution of the universal sphere or future sphere, why we evolve, because it is like this, it is a kind of project of optimisation probably. The universe is very simple generally. The Energy is distributed and coded in the matter for me and with codes , that implies a supermatter in this central cosmological sphere, this thing intrigues me in fact a lot.

Dear John, could tellme more about your general philosophy, and what do you consider like foundamental objects and why they are what they are, it seems essential to go deeper. Regards