First Things First: The Physics of Causality

Dear Steve,

NATURE provided only one form of VISIBLE reality. If you only like reading about "developed" unnatural humanly contrived codswallop, all you have to do am NOT READ MY COMMENTS.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Joe,all what I say is that you must add details,philosophically,mathematically,physically.There people see Always the same with your visible surface.What is this surface?what is its cause?do you beleive in a kind of Eternal infinite consciousness? have you explainations at different scales,quant or cosmol? please improve your ideas.

"Please Joe, stop to post Always the same". Perhaps you have almost nothing to say. Learn conciseness from McEachern.

While I doubt that dealing with entropy is a promizing way to answer most fundamental questions, I ask myself for an explanation of the obvious fact that there can be the same time for not causally related to each other events. Isn't this almost the only mystery?

Yes,I agree with Eckard,there it's totally to be frank crazzy and irritating now. Are you autist or what ? it's really crazzy Joe.

Steve, I guess, Joe (Joseph?) will ignore your advice how to comport himself here.

May I humbly repeat my question? "I ask myself for an explanation of the obvious fact that there can be the same time for not causally related to each other events. Isn't this almost the only mystery?"

What about neutrinos? I heared there are experiments at KIT to measure their tiny mass.

I referred to

https://eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2019-09/kift-nrf091619.php

Dear Steve and Eckard, I am not presenting my own personal theory of reality. Where do you think reality came from? Do you think it possible that there was reality BEFORE human beings ever set foot on this planet? Has the real planet Earth (and all matter) had a VISIBLE surface for millions of years?

Joe Fisher, Realist

Joe, your words do not mean Nothing. A visible surface for millions of Years? already Joe,our earth has 4,5 billions years and universe 13,7 billions years. A surface in in 2D and we observe in 3D ?? You say too that there was reality before human beings,yes we know all this,humans are youngs considering evolution and what Joe,please add ,improve,explain.

Joe,

"Where do you think reality came from?"

Sorry, I don't see this kind of questions fundamental ones because I consider reality just a reasonable conjecture. Experience and reasoning seem to confirm that all speculations are wrong which effectively subordinate this most fundamental credo to a model which teleologically attributes putative human reasoning to a creator or the like. Let's be realists instead.

Incidentally, I wrote (Joseph?) because it is Joe Kaeser's first name.

Did you read what I wrote on Cusanus and my guess on neutrinos?

Eckard

Eckard, I know reality could only have been provided by NATURE. There am no such REAL thing as abstract human invisible finite reasonable or unreasonable conjecture.

Joseph William Fisher, Realist

Steve, our planet Earth and all of the universe has always had, and will always continue to have oneunified VISIBLE surface.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Joseph,

The primary meaning of Latin word natura is birth. Reality was imagined as something that was born.

When I called reality a conjecture, I expressed my credo, the credo of perhaps all serious realists: In contrast to mere imagination, reality is something that objectively belongs to genuine predominantly direct material traces of the unchangeable past. While even predictions and plans can be real possibilities, which may come true with some probability and to some extent, no matter whether they are visible or not, e.g. the plans by Clemenceau and Morgenthau to reduce the Germans by 40 millions, the future is by my definition not yet real at a particular moment.

A conjecture is the formation of ideas or opinions from incomplete or doubtful information. I am not an agnostic at all in the sense of questioning objective reality but I am hesitating to attribute the conjecture of reality to several theories.

Eckard

I have an idea for quantum gravity that would also be the physics of causality. I can also explain the physics constants: c, h and G. I was inspired by the idea by looking at several facets of physics that include: big bang cosmology, the derivation of special relativity, the spacetime interval, the spacetime continuum, quantum mechanics, and the Casimir effect. There can only be one mechanism that best describes quantum gravity. There is one mechanism that can explain a large part of physics. It goes like this. Every time there is an "event", there is a spherical wavefront that travels outwards at the speed of light. This spherical wavefront broadcasts spacetime geometry and quantum states of frequency, energy, wavelength and momentum. The whole electromagnetic frequency range, from f_min to f_max, whatever those are. But spacetime geometry is made of quantum states of the form, [latex]e^{i(k_x x k_y y k_z z - omega t)} [/latex]. The important features are that (1) is expands outward at the speed of light, similar to how the big bang expands outward, (2) spacetime geometry is made of quantum states of frequency and wavelength, (3) these wavefronts are often detected as virtual photons of the Casimir effect, (4) the spacetime continuum is really the spacetime-momentum-energy continuum that is made of quantum states that can be excited in the same way that a quantum field can have excited states. (5) Particles of the standard model actually cause these wavefronts to form around these particles, these charges, because of the wavefront's inherent electric and magnetic fields. These wavefronts are interacting with charged particles creating the effect of a wave function. In other words, any charged standard model particle will interact with these wavefronts, producing the phenomena of quantum mechanics, describable with wave functions. (6) These wavefronts expand very quickly and begin to contribute to the quantum energy and momentum states of the spacetime continuum. Gravity is the effect of mass-energy being "mirrored" by the quantum momentum/energy states to produce a negative potential energy.

Do any of you understand the picture that I'm trying to describe?

Incidentally, causality is transmitted outward at the speed of light because these spacetime geometry wavefronts travel outward at the speed of light.

(Zeeya's note: Joe I've deleted the text of this post. It appears to be addressed to Dr Kuhn, but there's no reason to think he's reading this thread.

Please stay on topic.)

You do believe the large Hadron collider has been slamming protons into each other, and measuring their byproducts, right?

(Zeeya's note: Joe I've deleted the text of this post. It appears to be addressed to Nima Arkani Hamed, but there's no reason to think he's reading this thread.

Please stay on topic.)

Joe,

You appear to really want to contact Dr Kuhn about his Closer to Truth Facebook page. Please could you comment on the CTT Facebook page instead of on here?

I don't think Dr. Kuhn is reading this thread, so there is no reason to try to contact him here.

I have deleted a bunch of your CTT-related posts. I will delete more when I have time.

Thank you.

Hi Joe,

You're welcome to post your ideas to the alternative models thread, as you have done. But no members of the FQXi community are obliged to comment on them if they don't have anything they feel they want to say in response.

You are not welcome to post letters to Dr Kuhn regarding the Closer To Truth Facebook page on this thread, however, as it really has nothing to do with this thread, and is not the place to reach Dr Kuhn. Please use his Facebook page as a forum on which to discuss his Facebook page.