Thanks for sharing and developping, I like how you Think. I understand so your works and what you try to reach. We seacrh answers to explain what we don t know after all.
Wolfram is relevant indeed and a very good mathematician, I consider these maths essential and foundamental when they are utilised with determinism to explain our physics. But I consider the physics like the most important, the maths sometimes can imply confusions in the extrapolations with the infinities, or this or that. Like for example the multiverses or the whormholes, I beleive that they are simply mathematical extrapolations but are not really things real and deterministic, but of course it is just my opinion. So I agree that Wolfram is very relevant the maths important, what I spoke is about these strings, can we be sure that they are foundamental mathenmatical and physical objects at this planck scales and the 1D Cosmic field also ? I don t Think personally, so the branes, D branes, Mtheory, Yang mills or geometrodynamics are just a thought simply not proved. But I can recognise the relevance of mathematical Tools permitting to rank the fields and properties like with the E8 or E8X 8 or others lie groups,I make the same for my theory of spherisation, this optimisation of the universal sphere or future spheres , and the quantum 3D spheres and cosmological 3D spheres and the gravitational coded aether. I cannot affirm that these spheres are the foundamental objects and the same for this aether. For me this aether is sent from the central cosmological sphere and the space disappears when we take specific series having the same number than the cosmological spheres, we decrease the volumes form the central spheres, utilising the primes and increasing the number, oddly we apprroach the Dirac large number, now see that these 3D coded spheres playing between the zero absolute and the planck temperature can rank also these fields because they are in motions and oscillations these spheres , they rotate also, so we have many parameters to consider for the ranking of fields and particles , the densities, the sotings, the synchros, the superimposings, the volumes, the surfaces, the mass, the senses of rotations, the angles, the moments, this and that, we can even consider the poincare conjecture, the Ricci flow, the assynmetric Ricci flow that I have invented, the hopf fibrations, the lie derivatives, the lie groups, the euclidians and topological spaces, and others. It is not a problem to rank our particles fermionic and bosonic if I can say, it is even more simple and more intereting for me considering the numbers of these finite series. The photons are just a fuel so in this line of reasoning, particles permitting simply the electromagnetic forces, the life death,the fact to observe but we have a deeper logic probably to this universe than these photons, that is why I consider this gravitational aether sent from this central cosmological sphere. It is there that this infinite energy transforms and codes the particles, so all is made of particles and not made of fields like in the strings.
The Waves particles duality is also respected because all is in contact due to fact that this space disappears and they oscillate these 3D spheres. So Wolfram works can converge it is not a problem I beleive humbly.
Ps see that this general reasoning can help in technology because we can rank better these particles and fields with these 3D spheres.
About the space time, it is of course correct for our GR , and einstein field equation, but we consider only photons and it is an observation and different interpretation of this gravitation wich is here a curvature of our spacetime at high velocities, different thah Newton where this force is attractive between all mass at lower velocities. Now what I say is simple, if this gravitational aether exists, so we must superimpose a deeper logic to all this, Newton and Einstein, and it is like this that I have reached this quantum gravitation, I have encoded in nuclei different particles and changed the distances because the main codes are farer and the particles encoded also, so the standard model is just emergent, correct but emergent and cannot renormalise and quantize this quantum gravitation. All the thinkers have tried in considering only electromagnetic forces or otehrs and they have not reached it, Connes and his non commutativity, or Verlinde and his entropical gravity, or Lisi and his E8, or Penrose and his twistors, or the loops or this or that, they have not quantized it, there is a problem and I beleive that I found why in all humility, we need to Think beyond the box and add new parameters, like Is I said that this GR , the photons and the strings are a prison for the thinkers.
Like I said I liked your essay and maybe you could consider my theory and works, because it is more simple to explain our unknowns, the universe is so simple generally,m complex in details but so simple generally. These spheres seem foundamental, Poincare and Perelman shall agree I beleive :)
best regards and good luck in this contect