Restoration of predictability in gravitational collapse by Christian Corda

Dear Christain,

Good to meet again here on the FQXi contest,

While reading your essay I had the following remarks and questions:

Quote "the foundation of the BH information problem is that BHs seem to do not obey Schrödinger equations, which would allow pure states to evolve only into pure states." Unquote. The Total Simultaneity Interpretation", as I introduce, states that BH' are emergent phenomena (illusions) or could you say "PURE STATES". Not pure quantum mechanical and time-dependent seems to be supporting my interpretation. Probable Emissions and absorptions are all time and space-related emergent phenomena of ONE PURE STATE. The jump between two levels caused by an emission is the jump between one Pure State and another. In my perceptions, ALL jumps are sparkles of reality that is originating from the source of ALL emergence: Total Simultaneity. Each jump is like a split-up where one part is continuing (in another emergence(reality)) and the other slipping back into the womb as just an available probability.

I am interested in " effective Regge-Wheeler potential of the time-independent Schröedinger-like equation which governs QNMs, see [4, 5, 10, 11] for details" and going to see the details. (you may understand now why)

(17) on page 5 "represents a pure final state instead of a mixed final state", A pure final state is a past moment (compressed in our memory as a point of a time-line) and a mixed final state is the state from the unknown future where the observer has still to choose?

The "collapse of the wave function" I already interpreted In paragraph 2 of my comment.

"an electron's excited state is entangled with all the Hawking quanta emitted at that time [3, 5].",.An electron's excited state is again just a time-less moment of the emergent reality and is actually entangled to the WHOLE of the emergent phenomenon of this timeless moment.

I learned again a lot from your essay and so valued it high.

My essay is more of a philosophical approach, but I hope that after reading this remarks you will find some time to read my participation and tell me what you think about it. It is a whole new approach to reality.

Best regards

Wilhelmus de Wilde

Christian.

Thanks for your comments on mine. For ease I post my reply here. As for Mr Sorli I do understand doctrine is quite different, but don't have the peer pressure you have to endure to regimentally 'toe the line' and stick close to it. Studying AGN had suggested the old 'black hole' concept is quite wrong and a recycling model and Mexican Hat potential where ALL accreted matter re-emerges in quasar jets are far more consistent with observational data, though I understand you may not dare comment on that!

My response on mine is below.;;;;

"Thank you kindly, Yes, common views on Bell are quite different, but I'm careful to actually quote him accurately not 'interpret', which shows familiar interpretation quite wrong.

And Pauli/Boscovich 'exclusion' is indeed extended here, as 'relative motion' implies each party has one definable kinetic state only at any gauge (but a translating body MAY also rotate).

It seems Bosons may be essentially mathematical descriptions of helical motions of smaller change 'states', and photons only quantized on absorption & re-emission (including 'measurement'). Can you think why not?

The revised foundations proposed seem to allow far more consistent physics!

Very best."

Peter

Ch. I have added 3 posts to the thread of your comments on my essay. I think you will find them interesting and (perhaps) useful. John Crowell

Dear Christian

Thanks for the excellent question regarding the absoluteness of mathematical reality. I have answered your question under my essay. I would appreciate your fedback on my answers.

I would like submit my essay to the JHEPGC. Please advise how to proceed. You can email me at avsingh@alum.mit.edu. I am attaching two other papers for possible submission to the journal and would like your feedback.

Thanking you in advance,

Best Regards

Avtar SinghAttachment #1: Published_Paper_in_Phy_Essays_Origin_of_Motion_Part_2_4Singh.pdfAttachment #2: Published_Paper_in_Physics_Essays_Origin_of_Motion_Part_1_14Singh.pdf

Dear Christian:

Thank you for your time in reading my essay and providing valuable comments.

Regarding the mathematical basis of the Heisenberg uncertainty, it must be integrated with the physical aspects of the measurement that alters the physical characteristics of the phenomenon being measured. The original mathematical formulation of the Heisenberg uncertainty ignores the relativistic aspects of the quantum phenomenon being measured. My paper shows that integrating the relativistic aspects into the mathematics reveals that the measurement error or uncertainty is caused by the destructive nature of the classical measurement method of an inherently relativistic phenomenon. Hence, the uncertainty is inherent in the measuring method and not in the nature itself.

In summary, incomplete mathematical formulations ignoring the wholesome physical effects could lead to incorrect conclusions regarding the true nature of reality. Similarly, mathematical conclusions leading to multiple universes and dimensions are artifacts of incomplete mathematical formulations ignoring relativistic effects.

Best Regards

Avtar

Dear Christian:

Some additional thoughts -

Physics without mathematics is blind, mathematics without physics is lame, and without consciousness both are dead or lifeless.

Best Regards

Avtar Singh

Dear Christian

Reposting:

Thanks for the excellent question regarding the absoluteness of mathematical reality. I have answered your question under my essay. I would appreciate your fedback on my answers.

I would like submit my essay to the JHEPGC. Please advise how to proceed. You can email me at avsingh@alum.mit.edu. I am attaching two other papers for possible submission to the journal and would like your feedback.

Thanking you in advance,

Best Regards

Avtar SinghAttachment #1: 1_Published_Paper_in_Phy_Essays_Origin_of_Motion_Part_2_4Singh.pdfAttachment #2: 1_Published_Paper_in_Physics_Essays_Origin_of_Motion_Part_1_14Singh.pdf

Thank Christian.

Indeed you need to read my essay to understand the "Total Simultaneity Interpretation".It is a new interpretation that I introduced in 2012, and that has evolved through thinking.

I hope you can value the new insights that I am trying to introduce.

I await your comments.

Thank you very much.

Wilhelmus

Dear Christian Corda,

Very happy to see you again. I have downloaded a number of your papers, including your 2018 GRF essay, and find your proposal of quasi-normal modes fascinating. Several years ago I derived the key results of Verlinde's holo-model by discarding the idea of 'information' and deriving Bekenstein's "area quantization" based purely on energy. The addition of photons distributed over the black hole change as the hole grows, and the computation is simplified by adding photons in the right order. Nevertheless, they could conceivably come in any order, and this would be expected.

After reading your work on quasi-normal modes, I think this approach is compatible with your theory, and realize that emission as well as absorption occurs, and particularly, as you say:

"The emission of a particle...causes a decrease in the horizon..."

and, more specifically, that:

"The correspondence between emitted radiation and proper oscillation of the emitting body is a fundamental behavior of every radiation process in Science."

I have not tied my results to your equations, but if I manage to obtain anything that I think you might be interested in, I will surely contact you.

Meanwhile, I invite you to read my essay, Deciding on the nature of time and space, and welcome your comments.

Warmest regards,

Edwin Eugene Klingman

Christian,

Your essay did hit to the main problems as of black hole physics. What I am worried about is that your excellent points will not be understood mathematically by much of the FQXI community as they involved actual foundational structure of space-time issues. I will off this forum raise them privately so I am certain I understand them fully as well

Great work on statistical work on blackholes.but is there a human element to measurement and how empirical units came to be.please read/rate my essay here https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3525.thanks in advance.all comments will be appreciated

Dear Christian:

Great analysis and you take on hawking radiation is pretty good,

Please take a look at my essay A grand Introduction to Darwinian mechanics