Manfred,

Pleased to get to read it again (needed as I often tend to 'scan' 1st time) and comment. You know from RG we agree on much but certainly not all. None the less it was interesting, and of course the scoring criteria have nothing to do with 'agreement' and I found it met all the criteria well (perhaps partly as I'm familiar with your style?) so I can score it highly.

I'm sure your aware that others may consider it takes us back centuries to 'earth centric' dynamics, certainly challenging to wide astronomical data! That quite unique view shouldn't affect scoring but, like mine, departure from even questionable doctrinal beliefs if often poorly received!

I also look forward to your views on my essay which I know you'll understand and also appreciate. I hope you'll confirm that and ask any questions.

Very best of luck in the contest.

Peter

    Dear Peter,

    thanks for your kind comments. I am aware that my "style" is quite different, and the purpose of my essay was not to get a "prize", but to provoke and invite for "thinking" in terms of "imagine" what could happen if Greta Thunberg is right and it could come to a finding that would say .. "This is all wrong". Are we prepared ? (like Bill Gates asked 2015 at Tedx if we are ready for a "Pandemic" game.)

    I guess that all Talk is cheap and i will try to calculate an Experiment to demonstrate with laser in laboratory that E=hf is wrong hopefully till end of this year. We should not depend on belief, but on experimental physics.

    I did not rated your essay yet, as i have printed it and will read it carefully within the next days and after that comment and rate on it Peter.

    See you there,

    all the best

    Manfred

    Dear Dzhechko Boris Semyonovich,

    thanks a lot for your wishes and kind remarks. I think it would be great if we all could work together and cooperate to "fix" the mistakes in contemporary phyiscs. I guess all of us are driven in a similar way to find a "mistake" or a fix as we "feel" that something is wrong. As said i rate your essay as very helpful and a important contribution in this process. Are we opponent? I don't think so. It is not about winning or loosing so we can't be opponent.

    Best Regards

    Manfred

    a month later

    why are we humans? do we decide our environment or does it decide who we are? may be a complex question.please read/rate my essay on how Human thought gives birth to the world we see and define here-https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3525.i really appreciate.

      Dear Michael Muteru,

      the elephant in the room... yes.

      I will read your essay and reply my comment in your thread.

      Give me some days..

      Best

      Manfred

      Finally i learned a lot during the essay contest and the "corona"-crisis and try to offer a new approach of science to the "NEW NORMAL" with an "educational" Video published on youtube:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EIBjt_5TU0U

      I wish everyone to stay safe and healthy in the crisis, as there is a call on us to stand together as one and to learn about our own personal history and traumatic childhood, when adults lied to us and claimed pi to be 3,14...

      Best regards

      Manfred U.E. Pohl

      BTW.

      i published Matrix decoded in April 2019:

      https://www.amazon.com/Matrix-Decoded-Everything-Apocalypse-Revelation/dp/1095579665/ref=sr_1_2?dchild=1&qid=1588535929&refinements=p_27%3AManfred+U.E.+Pohl&s=books&sr=1-2&text=Manfred+U.E.+Pohl

      There was sold only one ! single book from USA.

      In August 2019 was announced Matrix 4.

      Announced to be first showed to the world in Germany on 20.5.21 (my Birthday)

      and 2nd in USA on 21.5.21..

      I know the storyplot already ... :-)

      Best fun.

      To finally explain the Turing completition of theoretical biology:

      the "endgame" of the pyramid sheme (Exodus / Old Testament) is in principle the MOSES game trying to reenter Paradise.

      Today

      7,8 Billion people on the planet "think" they are more developed in life than mice in the kitchen. But they do "experiments" with mice i.E. to create vaccine or learn about biology. Why?

      In truth, human beings are just by mistake a kind of "cancer" within another living being (ecosystem). But there is a spontaneous "healing" available to cancer!

      Now, to "heal" the world, ONE only ONE (Moses) (mutation) single human being must step out and inject initial (code) to heal and "infect" over 7.8 Billion people.

      As anyone would be envy, no one would think that a single person, only one out of 7.800.000.000 is right and all the others are "wrong".

      But this is evolution: from this 1 it become two following identical, then 4.. exponetial grow.

      "Patient Zero" / Moses (a spontaneous mutation)

      There is no "two" mutations at the same time possible.

      Unfortunately, then all "science" and even every single computer built becomes a "joke", because it turns out to be complete nonsense what we are doing.

      We are killing mice in our kitchen but not eat them just because we are even more "stupid" than mice. No animal is doing such silly stuff. Thats why we (human beings) had invented science (to study animals and living beings) in order to try to "heal" and become animal again (re-enter Paradise)

      (Lions do just live in Paradise)

      Computers are just a representation of our irrational thinking.. From outside human being might look like a cancer and the "Matrix" is the code (programm) running trying to repair (healty mutation) the own (ill) mutation in the DNA.

      The idea that human being are intelligent just because we managed to be so "many" indivduals ist quite wrong, if we just accept that we are wrong.

      Now the most important aspect of this essays is not about "science", but about human rights, that means a citizen on this earth must be allowed to life with pi = 1 and deny to use any of those computer, pocket-calculator or cellphone.

      Wouldn't that be Paradise a live without computers in general?

      Have Fun

      Manfred U.E. Pohl

      Here i try to look into the future of science in general to give an idea of what will happen if human being would apply the all new mathematics and physics. It is a question of "will" as David Bohm already pointed out 1990 in Amsterdam: we could change the direction, if we decide to do so.

      Armageddon in Mathematics and Physics: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKsgX9a5DsA

      Might be disturbing to some scientist, because it looks like human beings are much more stupid then lions or dolphins. On the other hand, it is obvious that lions and dolphins are more clever, they have fun and don't work in circles.

      In the end, now i left the feature to be a human being and became an animal, to be "above". But not like Planet of apes.

      Best,

      Manfred U E Pohl

      • [deleted]

      • Post #31

      And this is the attempt to skech

      the new mathematics to fit the need for idea of Penrose and Smolin new mathematics to start from cratch with included mathematical "real" time.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qi6XANmH0-I

      best Manfred U E Pohl