Essay Abstract

In essence, this paper is not an attempt to explain collapsed gas clouds, proto-planetary disks, Higgs bosons, neutrinos, black holes, dark matter, relativity or quantum mechanics, by way of filtered telescopic data, selective physical experiments, recursive mathematical patterns, complex differential equations, mathematical constants and infinities, or complex computer simulations; instead, this paper is simply an attempt to use basic sequential thought experiments, coherent standardized explanations, and plain standard language that can stretch across all fields of science, to conceptually explain, some of, the mechanisms and processes that facilitated the transfer of energy from the core of the Earth, to the first set of primordial ecosystems on the surface of the planet, or to conceptually explain, some of, the nuclear, chemical and physical properties of the newly formed planet, which culminated in the emergence of both water and life on the surface of the Earth

Author Bio

I AM INTERESTED IN ALL IDEAS FROM PHYSICS, MATHEMATICS, BIOLOGY, CHEMISTRY, PHILOSOPHY, ECONOMICS, POLITICAL SCIENCE, ARCHEOLOGY, HISTORY, AND SO ON THAT CAN PROVIDE INSIGHTS INTO THE TRUE NATURE OF HUMANITY, AND THE TRUE NATURE OF THE BROADER UNIVERSE.

Download Essay PDF File

Dear Antoine E Pinnock, you well described the current situation in physics as a dichotomy that led to its bifurcation, i.e. to the division into numerous branches competing with each other. Bifurcation as a cancerous tumor struck physics, and the individual human consciousness is no longer able to contain all the developed theories that claim to be true of their knowledge of nature. There was a disappearance from physics of the foundation uniting it on which it stood. The concept of matter is no longer perceived as the basis of everything. I agree that to study matter it is necessary to distinguish its properties separately from each other. However, one should not separate them from matter itself and declare them to exist separately from it. For example, space is initially perceived by people as separately existing from matter. They believe that it is placed in it as in a container. A statement has appeared that matter exists in space and in time. However, it would be more correct to say that matter moves and forms space. I invite you to discuss my essay, in which I show the successes of the neocartesian generalization of modern physics, based on the identity of space and matter of Descartes: "The transformation of uncertainty into certainty. The relationship of the Lorentz factor with the probability density of states. And more from a new Cartesian generalization of modern physics. by Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich ".

    Boris Thanks for your sentiment.

    From om my perspective unification it's not simply about unifying concepts within mathematics and physics only, but instead it is about uniting those concepts with concepts from fields such as chemistry and biology as well.

    I will post a brief remark about energy, matter and space on your entire.

    2 months later

    Dear Antoine,

    You presented good and important conclusions on the crisis in the philosophical basis of fundamental science. Here you can recall the philosophical testaments of A.Einstein:

    "At the present time, a physicists has to deal with philosophic problems to a much greater degree than physicists of the previous generations. Physicists forced to that the difficulties of their own science."

    "Often turn over the truths that are settled in physics and mathematics."

    Right, you have concluded:

    "Thus, the incompatibility between the theories of relativity and quantum mechanics may stem, not from calculations about gravity or incorrect equations, but from the principle that both theories fail to account for some of the key components of the universe, one of which is the significance of processes that created life in the universe. "

    I believe that in addition to mental experiments, it is necessary to introduce in addition an Ontological standard for basification (substantion justification) of theories that claim to be fundamental.

    You are right: fundamental science needs new ideas, first of all, new ontological ideas in order to include the "LifeWorld" in an holistic scientific picture of the world.

    Respectfully,

    Vladimir

      11 days later

      Dear Antoine E Pinnock, it is true that in the definition of mass, matter and energy, the concept of motion and constant movement is definitely important to us. However, I believe that one should not think about a separate energy-independent existence of matter. I agree that the formula for the equivalence of mass and energy gives reason to think so, if by mass we mean only the amount of matter. Like, matter disappears and becomes energy. In my essay, I suggested understanding mass not only as the amount of matter, but also as the centrifugal acceleration of its rotation in the corpuscle. I believe that space during rotation goes into the state of matter, since it is matter.

      Sincerely, Dzhechko Boris Semyonovich

      a month later