Hi Georgina,
Good to see you back, and with such a nice, fun, readable essay. You already know I'm right behind you with your message having discussed it so much with you in the past.
I confess to getting a little confused at first over beables, being so familiar with John Bells slightly different specification. At one point you equated them with observables, wearas Bell used them as; "be-ables as against observables"('Speakable..' p52). Your beables as against 'measurables' is subtly different, I just had to 're-programme' a little, but I find that good exercise.
I have it down for a good score. It seem to have been hit with the same 1.0 score as mine so expect a hike shortly, though I'm sure you don't hold out to much hope of most others seeing the argument, as usual!
I hope you'll get to mine, which I think is seminal this year, rebuilding coherently from improved foundations up. It's very 'dense' (again!) so do ask any questions.
Very best. And stay safe.
Peter