Dear Dear Joseph Maria Hoebe

Hello and thanks for sharing this post.

Essentially, Graph theory as mentioned and used to make decisions in our nowadays lives, has many applications in New modern physics and quantum mechanics in order to better understand behavior of fundamental particles in universe and how they can interact with each other.

Recently, new scientists as i have done research, are using graphs for discussion about quantum behaviors.One of the most important reasons can be proof of theories that has been expressed and developed by Feynman, Dirac and Albert Einstein.

After proposing new ideas on Gravitons as supposed particles in mathematical descriptions of Physics Phenomena, its time to reconsider these developed ideas through Graph Theory and Complex systems.Although, I have worked with Creative Particle of Higgs theory with Professor Hossein Javadi and would like to see Quantum physics from this point of view too.

I am looking forward for your comments and new trends will be posted after proposing new ideas to have warmly discussions about Physics and Quantum behaviors.

Regards

Dr Hamed Daei Kasmaei

Applied Mathematician and Active researcher in Particle and Astrophysics

Thank you very much for your kind feedback.

My essay is based on the idea that we can use form/shape/model as a symbol to convey and to convert understanding and knowledge. See: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311858104_On_the_use_of_analogy_to_mathematical_models

In the 2020 FQXI Essay I show that we have already a choice at the beginning of building up a form (the choice is D as an alternative for C in the plane or as a point into another dimension).

That choice is an important decision, because each choice shows a very different outcome in form (tetrahedral vs octahedral).

Another example is this:

Today, Sunday Feb. 2nd 2020, My math friend Richard told me about a picture used in the development of the Amplituhedron of Nima Arkani-Hamed. The same picture Richard and I use in our geometry called Hedronsciences.

I said to him "This is very nice, but also the old school thinking. It is thinking in particles".

I suggest a quite different approach for thinking about existence. Not by collisions and scatterings, but by starting with the zero state of Being, where there is no movement at all, yet.

Zero has some very interesting properties.

We can think of it as Nothing, Empty(ness), Void, Absence and so on.

To show Zero I made a toy-theory: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304749293_On_Borromean_rings_made_with_IEye_sticks

In that essay I show that if each coordinate of the XYZ matrix is made of cubes, then the Origin is an empty cube, but still a cube, because it is defined by what is: its surroundings: the XYZ-matrix of Numbers.

From this we can go on with:

Next to Zero is "Just not Zero" = "the Infinitesimal".

Infinitesimal has also some very interesting properties. It is impossible to divide it. If it was possible you would have something which could be smaller, less, tinier, than the infinitesimal, and that can only be Zero, Nothing, Absence.

The Infinitesimal is really A-thomos. It is not an atom; it is the least quantity, the prime scalar, the Quantum of Quantum Physics.

In my research which I named Hedronsciences (see: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311858009_Hedronsciences_a_science_on_connection ) I show how this infinitesimal can be understood as the building"block" of existence. In the published PDF I show some protocols and that at first there are only limited ways for growth.

With such protocols we may make a multi-dimensional map in the form of some shape.

Together with Richard I made, based on this kinds of protocols, what we called the Ccube and the C-sphere. The Csphere is a kind of Goldberg polyhedron, but I use it as a way to stellate Space with tetrahedra, not just the regular one but, if needed, with all 31 different ones (each defined by the 6 possible kinds of differences in length for the edges of a tetrahedron. See the paper, §4 page 7-11).

The Csphere then is a theoretical rigid multi-dimensional map with all possible kinds of paths for an infinitesimal to grow up in relation to and with other infinitesimal into dimensional forms (shapes) as "Sets of Connection" full of meaning.

A Set-of- Connection is in the old school of thinking a Particle and in my thinking a Being with meaning.

I hope you get my gist. It is a huge difference in thinking of particles, made of sub-atomic particles, or in thinking in sets-of-connections in which the connections are made by infinitesimal quanta, through which they form new states of Being without being "material", but still matter everything by their meaning.

The Ccube is shown in: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311858197_Voxtrahedron

i am looking forward to further this kind of discussion.

with kind regards,

Jos

7 days later

Dear Jos,

Thank you for your work, I suspect that the documents you have sent me are the right path to focusing my mind on some statements made about the Universe by Religious Experts which I have been stewing over for several years.

Although I have not gone down the road of a serious study of your attached contribution due to my present commitments, I hope that I will be able to choose to study your conclusions at the juncture points of the coming months. I am sure that choosing to study your work will take me to the best outcome.

Best Regards and Wishes,

Dr Mark Doost

23 days later

Dear Joseph (Jos),

I have entered my essay, so now we can discuss our entries in as authors.

I have read your essay twice to get a better understanding, you evolve a clear "line" that is to appreciate.

In my perception, lines, surfaces, volumes are time-dependent experiences of the conscious agent. I am searching for the origin of these time and space-dependent events.

I hope for your remarks

you will find my essay here

Bedankt en succes

Wilhelmus de Wilde

a month later

Joseph Hoebe re-uploaded the file Hoebe_Phy_vs_Psy.pdf for the essay entitled "Phy vs Psy. Sic or chic?" on 2020-04-11 00:35:52 UTC.

12 days later

Hi Jos,

I like the concept of putting geometry back at the forefront of physics. Was it Einstein who said all physics IS geometry? I also qualified as an Architect so am very familiar with 3D geometry but also the tapered 'spiral' form of design development, reflecting natures dynamics, as Euler discovered.

You identify the symbolic and practical importance of what can also be 'vectors' a concept I've used alongside 3D rotations/helices to demystify QM. You set out some fundamentals very well.

I see your essay seems to have been trolled with 1.0 scores as mine has. My score will help. Well done.

Peter

Thanks Peter, you´re very kind.

We are on the right track with our thinking on these subjects. It is always nice to get some endorsement.

I hope to write some other paper on this issue later this year. I will send it to you.

This trolling is indeed an issue for the fqxi team. I will ask to look at it. thanks for the score.

bests,

Jos

    5 days later

    nice work based on premonition, it illustrates motion that translates to 2D geometry eventually to 3D objects that we touch and interact in our world. please read/rate my essay here https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3525.on how cosciusness is key to all science.

    9 days later

    Dear Thinker Joseph Maria Hoebe,

    Thank you for your nice essay on motion that changes from 2D to 3D geometry. There are many similarities you and me....

    1. Your date of Birth is 8July 1954 and mine is 8 Aug 1954 exactly one month younger!

    2. You 3D geometry for thinking and development of Physics, and I also used 3D geometry for development of Physics. I called it Dynamic Universe Model which is a general n-body problem solution used for explaining the properties Universe or cosmology. Many of its predictions came true.

    3. You suffered health problems and I also suffered with early symptoms of paralysis with blood clottings in brain.

    4. You got a revelation in 2015, so did I got it 40 years back to do this work of Dynamic Universe Model and Goddess Vak told me to do this work, which I am continuing till today

    Hope you will find some time to read and rate my essay " A properly deciding, Computing and Predicting new theory's Philosophy : https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3416 " to see other similar points..........

    Best Regards

    =snp

    9 days later

    Dear Joseph,

    I greatly appreciated your work and discussion. I am very glad that you are not thinking in abstract patterns.

    "Coronavirus Sars-CoVid-2 shows in a gruesome way that we are all connected in one way or another".

    While the discussion lasted, I wrote an article: "Practical guidance on calculating resonant frequencies at four levels of diagnosis and inactivation of COVID-19 coronavirus", due to the high relevance of this topic. The work is based on the practical solution of problems in quantum mechanics, presented in the essay FQXi 2019-2020 "Universal quantum laws of the universe to solve the problems of unsolvability, computability and unpredictability".

    I hope that my modest results of work will provide you with information for thought.

    Warm Regards, `

    Vladimir

    Jos,

    Yes please do send a link to your other paper. I have a collaboration paper I think is very important in for peer review with Nature Physics at present so fingers crossed! I'll send you that. I note I hadn't applied your score yet so doing so now. Best of luck.

    Peter