Dear Lockie Cresswell,
You have identified the frustration that many of us theorists feel:
was knocked back on the third occasion with just a brief comment that 'proof' is needed. That wasn't helpful at all! What we seem to need is a mentor who is in the system, who knows the ropes, and who can encourage and suggest, without putting his or her biases to the front. What we all need is open and honest dialog.
I have also dealt with this for years. But I have a tool others don't have. The Standard Model of Physics is full of holes. If you recall my paper is built around pointing out the errors. I have another major key point today, "the Doppler indefensible as a redshift source". Copying my transverse discussion hasnt worked. The color and figures get lost. See Wiki. For now after reading the summary here. I can e-mail you the whole revelation if interested.Meanwhile:
Important!
Astronomers know of three sources of redshift/blueshift: Doppler shifts; gravitational redshifts (due to light exiting a gravitational field); and cosmological expansion (where space itself stretches). This article concerns itself only with Doppler shifts.
Note that the third source here is cosmological expansion which is the fantasy that came from circular reasoning and may have never existed.
The second source here is the always ignored gravitational redshift which overrides the idea of a constant speed c. The exit from a gravitational field results in a slowing of the speed, thus red shift.
The first source here is Doppler shifts which can arrive from various relative motions of stars. So we can choose 'the sky of all-stars' is in circular motion around earth. (or any other central body one chooses)
Best of luck Lockie.
Paul Schroeder