Markus,

When a mentalist predicts your imagined scene using priming techniques, you can regard the primer as the cause of the imagination which, in turn, can be regarded as a memory of the primer. Similarly, a future `primer' (perturbation in the essay) can be regarded as a (retro-) cause of your imagination which, in turn, can be regarded as the (future-) memory of the primer, if the imagination can be used to predict the `primer'.

As you can tell, my idea rhymes with the notion of "retrocausality". However, retrocausality alone is inconsistent with `future memory' phenomena; The underlying ontology must also be non-mechanistic/non-IVP - as I explain in the essay.

Best,

Yehonatan

Dear Yehonatan,

I greatly appreciated your work and discussion. I am very glad that you are not thinking in abstract patterns.

"Physical modeling of cognitive functions requires, first, that physics be put on firm conceptual ground, which is not its present status".

While the discussion lasted, I wrote an article: "Practical guidance on calculating resonant frequencies at four levels of diagnosis and inactivation of COVID-19 coronavirus", due to the high relevance of this topic. The work is based on the practical solution of problems in quantum mechanics, presented in the essay FQXi 2019-2020 "Universal quantum laws of the universe to solve the problems of unsolvability, computability and unpredictability".

I hope that my modest results of work will provide you with information for thought.

Warm Regards, `

Vladimir

Write a Reply...