for Slovenian readersAttachment #1: Gravitacija_in_kmozmologija.pdf
Measurability and Computability of the Universe by Amrit Srecko Sorli
14 days later
seems that electromagnetic vacuum is so loaded with 5G that this radiation influences the coherent electromagnetic field of the human organism to the point where the immune system does not work properly anymoreAttachment #1: Covid_5G_Nano_Vaccini_Sorli_Di_Sia_1.pdf
5 days later
Dear Amrit,
I have read your essay and comments with great interest. Excellent intellectual attack on the philosophically naive hypothesis of the "big bang".
You write
"What we can measure for sure exists. In order to build the most accurate computable picture of the universe I propose in this essay a bijectivity principle: in the modelling of the universe we will use only what is measurable. We will use only obtained data. "
I would also add: an understanding of the model of the Universe (for all people on Earth) and its heuristic. First of all, understanding of its ontological structure and, as a consequence, the nature of fundamental constants, the structure of space, the nature of time, information, consciousness.
Did you sign this An Open Letter ?
Where can I read the ontological justification (basification) for your model of the Universe?
With kind regards,
Vladimir
Vladimir, BB cosmology belongs to the history of physics.
yours amritAttachment #1: 1_4_-_Einstein_Vision_of_Time_and_Infinite_Universe_without_Singularities_-_The_End_of_Big_Bang_Cosmology.pdfAttachment #2: 1_3_-_Black_Holes_are_Rejuvenating_Systems_of_the_Universe.pdf
Dear Amrit.short but very potent essay.rated you highly.i too think that we may be losing out a lot by ignoring how it all came to be here https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3525.i think the most popular cosmology theory may be way off Mark.kindly take your time to review.any feedback appreciated.Thanks .All the best
Dear Mark. FQXi is good. We can publish our science here. But remember we will nevdr get any reward. FQXI will always give awaeds to established prof of physics who are lost in their mind. They are talking nonsense. They are not able to make any progress. This is it. Send me your work on my mail. sorli.amrit@gmail.com
Excellent! The main thing for me is that you are against the "big bang" hypothesis. The highest score. But I believe that an ontological justification (basification) is still necessary. Time is a phenomenon and we need to look for a basic noumenon. Plus a hundred-year problem with the "foundations of mathematics", but means with knowledge in general. The crisis of understanding "takes by the throat" not only fundamental science, but also global society.
If you have time, look also at my dialectic-ontological ideas .
With kind regards,
Vladimir
13 days later
Dear Sorli,
excellent essay. BB is an artificial model that cannot happen in nature. I have another model of emergence of Universe. The Universe can also occur without BB. Emergence of Universe from nothing is disclosed in:
Big Bang without Bang. http://viXra.org/abs/1901.0037
Before Big Bang. http://viXra.org/abs/1901.0141.
More over, this explains the absence of antimatter in the Universe: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330986087_Hypothesis_of_Tetraverse.
Best regards
Ilgaitis