A properly deciding, Computing and Predicting new theory’s Philosophy by Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta

Satyavarapu Gupta

Essay Abstract

Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability are very much undesirable properties and out-comes of any theory. That theory might have developed by a very reputed person or by a group of well-educated and knowledgeable persons. There is no point of poring resources, money and highly educated man power into that theory. That theory might have given some good results earlier, but if it is having a complex mathematical base and if the possible outcomes of these equations are mis-leading to these above 3Uns, people should discard and switch to another new theory which is giving experimentally verifiable results.

Author Bio

I am just nobody. All this work was guided by Maa Vak. A single frame work called "Dynamic Universe model" an N-Body problem solution, solves many Physical problems. This model is computationally simple and iterative, Mathematically / Logically deciding and predicted many physical results like 'Blue shifted Galaxies', 'No Dark matter', 'Frequency upshifting' / 'radiation to matter conversion', which all came true after 7 or 8 years after prediction. The foundational philosophy behind this model is presented here. For free downloading of published Scientific papers and books see http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.com/

Download Essay PDF File

jayanti Murty

The essay by Mr.S N P Gupta is a bold attempt against the main stream physics,but simple enough to explain experimental facts with out the need for complicated theories based on relativity and quantum physics which led to the existence of Dark matter,Dark energy, singularities and Big bang.

He proved that his theory could explain Blue shifted galaxies, Pioneer anomaly, CMB etc with out the present theories in vogue.Foundation of his theory is well established Newtonian gravity which requires no need to use General Relativity.I am sure in near future, he will get his well deserved attention from numerous scientists working in the field of cosmology.His painstaking effort in developing a software for solving the problems of cosmology is laudable.I wish he will emerge as one of the leading stalwarts in the field.

Dr JVS Murty

Satyavarapu Gupta

Respected Prof JVS. Murty

Thank you for your First Post with lots of Blessings.

I did not attempt to anything unguided in the subject matter of the Essay Contest, I just followed guidelines given by FQXi Contest "Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability".

I just elaborated what should be the freedom available to an author when the " real open thinking" is supported. Nothing else. I am not against Bigbang based cosmologists. They have their own scientific agenda and formulation and of-course, a gigantic financial support. Well and good.

I am also hoping to get some support for 'Dynamic Universe Model', in some near future.

Thank you once again Sir

Wilhelmus de Wilde

Dear Satyavarapu,

Thank you for your remarks.

First, have no fear because I am not a prof, nor am I connected to an Institution, so no Walls.

The mathematics I got at the University of Delft are mostly forgotten, so I try to think free and simple.

(A6) Yes indeed I use the expression singularity, the reason is that Total Simultaneity is out of reach for us, and I have no other means of expression.

B 1/4: I fully agree.

B5 may become verifiable when we create a quantum computer and the result is that we created Artificial Consciousness(not AI).so until now it is not verifiable but in the future, it will be.

B 6/9 fully agreed upon.

C1: In my opinion, there are too many NO's for an emergent reality, if you accept all that NO's you are describing my Total Simultaneity.

C 2: I am a great fan of FREE THINKING.

C 3: Now you come back after accepting all the no's, you are entering a model with all the rules and dimensions that belong in an emergent phenomenon like our reality. OF course, this is your interpretation of this emergent phenomenon and as I also argue: We just don't know. You and I are just adding conscious interpretations. Who am I to say you are wrong?

C 4: Each model is remaining just a model with only partially events that are involved. (The further you go into history the lesser the chance that you exists, see my article https://www.academia.edu/40946114/The_TOTAL_SIMULTANEITY_INTERPRETATION

I agree with your conclusion No BB.

Your conclusion is about the development of new interpretations of our reality, I think we both are on that way you with your DUM (but only shortly explained in your essay) and I with my Total Simultaneity Interpretation.

Best regards

Wilhelmus de Wilde

Satyavarapu Gupta

Respected Wilhelmus de Wilde

Thank you for confirming your post which I posted on Mar. 6, 2020 @ 10:13

My login failed and I got it back today....

Best Regards

=snp

Satyavarapu Gupta

Author Wilhelmus de Wilde de Wilde replied on Mar. 5, 2020 @ 10:27 GMT

Dear Satyavarapu,

Thank you for your remarks.

First, have no fear because I am not a prof, nor am I connected to an Institution, so no Walls.

The mathematics I got at the University of Delft are mostly forgotten, so I try to think free and simple.

(A6) Yes indeed I use the expression singularity, the reason is that Total Simultaneity is out of reach for us, and I have no other means of expression.

B 1/4: I fully agree.

B5 may become verifiable when we create a quantum computer and the result is that we created Artificial Consciousness(not AI).so until now it is not verifiable but in the future, it will be.

B 6/9 fully agreed upon.

C1: In my opinion, there are too many NO's for an emergent reality, if you accept all that NO's you are describing my Total Simultaneity.

C 2: I am a great fan of FREE THINKING.

ERPRETATION I agree with your conclusion No BB.

Best regards

Wilhelmus de Wilde

Bookmark and Share

Satyavarapu Gupta

Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Mar. 6, 2020 @ 10:09 GMT

Wilhelmus de Wilde,

Thank you for nice comparison of Both essays.

You are correct, concepts are same wordings are different.

I am just posting your post on my essay.

N-body problem solution solves all these problems which is explained by all these 'NO's !!!

Best wishes to Total Simultaneity Interpretation!!!

=snp.gupta

Bookmark and Share

report post as inappropriate

Vladimir Rogozhin

Dear Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta,

Very deep and interesting ideas. You do not support the Big Bang hypothesis, I agree with that. This hypothesis introduces maximum ontological uncertainty into the scientific picture of the world. Do you know this An Open Letter to the Scientific Community?

Respectfully,

Vladimir

Satyavarapu Gupta

Respected Prof Vladimir,

Einstein did not like and support Bigbang based cosmology!!!

I reproduced some of your words of wisdom from "An Open Letter to the Scientific Community?".

.......................Supporters of the big bang theory may retort that these theories do not explain every cosmological observation. But that is scarcely surprising, as their development has been severely hampered by a complete lack of funding. Indeed, such questions and alternatives cannot even now be freely discussed and examined. An open exchange of ideas is lacking in most mainstream conferences. Whereas Richard Feynman could say that "science is the culture of doubt", in cosmology today doubt and dissent are not tolerated, and young scientists learn to remain silent if they have something negative to say about the standard big bang model. Those who doubt the big bang fear that saying so will cost them their funding.

Even observations are now interpreted through this biased filter, judged right or wrong depending on whether or not they support the big bang. So discordant data on red shifts, lithium and helium abundances, and galaxy distribution, among other topics, are ignored or ridiculed. This reflects a growing dogmatic mindset that is alien to the spirit of free scientific inquiry.

Today, virtually all financial and experimental resources in cosmology are devoted to big bang studies. Funding comes from only a few sources, and all the peer-review committees that control them are dominated by supporters of the big bang. As a result, the dominance of the big bang within the field has become self-sustaining, irrespective of the scientific validity of the theory.

Giving support only to projects within the big bang framework undermines a fundamental element of the scientific method -- the constant testing of theory against observation. Such a restriction makes unbiased discussion and research impossible. To redress this, we urge those agencies that fund work in cosmology to set aside a significant fraction of their funding for investigations into alternative theories and observational contradictions of the big bang. To avoid bias, the peer review committee that allocates such funds could be composed of astronomers and physicists from outside the field of cosmology....................................

Even after 20 years these concepts are same and they are ruling the world like some dictator ship.....

I was just hoping for the last 35 to 40 years that the funding will be released from dictatorship ,fears will be reduced ad freedom of speech will come into light someday........

I am just waiting..................................................................

Respectfully,

Snp.gupta

Vladimir Rogozhin

Dear Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta,

Today, when science, primarily fundamental science, is experiencing a crisis of philosophical foundations, support for research and researchers in at least three alternative areas is needed. And this primarily refers to cosmology. Humanity will not be able to develop steadily when science says that "In the beginning was the Big Bang ..."... I think that children at school studying Astronomy will not understand this and will ask questions that cosmologists cannot answer. Today, we all need patience, hope and great mutual understanding.

I wish you success!

Vladimir

Satyavarapu Gupta

Respected Prof Vladimir,

Wonderful song on hope!!!! The song rightly tells us that in reality we cosmologists are in fog and cold buzzard of dictator ship. This song is appropriate for our situation!!! All the young children are taught about Bigbang, as though it is right. This aspect pinches me......

Best Regards

=snp.gupta

Amrit Sorli

Gupta is right BB cosmology is a fairy tale.Attachment #1: Cosmology_based_on_measured_data_and_observation.pdf

Satyavarapu Gupta

Respected Prof Sorli,

You wrote an excellant essay on Cosmology, you are correct in saying that measured data is correct than calculated data. When calculated data and if it is a predicted data by a model and if it matches with measured data then that model is also correct.

Blackholes and Bigbang are singularities with infinite densities and are not possible. CMB is nothing but Star and Galaxy radiation. Astronomical Jets are formed with particles that are emitted by sun and stars and they travel in parallel to galaxy plane and bend perpendicularly at galaxy center.

There a Densemass at galaxy center not a blackhole. It is having huge mass finite density to support the Galaxy disk, but not with infinite density.

What do you say ....???

Best

Manfred Pohl

Dear Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta,

this is a very useful essay and all so true. A new theory is needed to serve Humanity, not the author or his scientific circle that defends boundaries.

Thanks for the essay that is recommend.

Best regards

Manfred U.E.Pohl

Satyavarapu Gupta

Dear Sir

Mail is not going to your id....

contact@manfred pohl.de

do you have any other ID? I just gave you highest of appreciation to your essay, best wishes

=snp

KOFI DOMPERE

Dear Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta,

your statement "A theory in pure Mathematics and a theory in Physics have different requirements

and outcomes. Apure Mathematical theory may not have any physical basis and out-comes

also may not have any physical significances." is part to the debate of representation. Mathematics is simply a language that may be used to communicate ideas of different category of knowing. You are correct to point out the differences between pure mathematical theory and the theory of physics in relation of course to decidability, computability and predictability. This representation problem was central to the debate between Russell and Brouwer and between the intuitionist school and formalist school in the use of classical mathematics under classical paradigm of thought. Physical phenomenon must not be forced into obaying mathematical laws. Mathematics must be used to present physical laws and behavior.

KOFI KISSI DOMPERE.

Satyavarapu Gupta

Dear Professor,

See my post on your essay and check your mail also...

Best

=snp.gupta

Avtar Singh

Dear Mr. Gupta:

Thanks for your time and comments on my essay.

You have presented good ideas for requirements of an acceptable theory in your essay. I agree with you that Big Bang is not a complete and correct theory. My paper presents an alternative to the Big Bang paralyzed by numerous unresolved paradoxes.

Good luck with your essay.

Best Regards

Avtar

Satyavarapu Gupta

Hi Sab,

Thanks for your comments and for the Good luck wishes.

Please check your essay and mail for further comments

Best

=snp.gupta

Peter Jackson

Dear Satyavarapu,

A pleasure to find you here again and read your highly agreeable essay. Our good agreement from the past is continued, and I appreciate your clear, direct and concise English, in the spirit of the essay itself, and underlying theory.

I find very little to criticise, but a few queries. While I agree common conceptions of dark energy and matter are badly misguided, the fact is there are a whole tranche of effects and findings which need explanation, building up since Faraday's 'action at a distance', Coulomb, Casimir etc, and the well evidenced 'pair production' (which I'm sure you won't suggest is from 'nothing!) I think you'll like my very simple derivation of these simplifying much of physics!

The only other thing I'd say is that it's a shame, given the space you had, not to expand on HOW the simulations refer to 'solve' the list you give. i.e. what derives the 'force behind expansion' which I've derivved with a soecific physical mechnism and shown the evidence (as well as it's entirely CYCLIC and time limited character!) So many will likely dismiss those as empty claims. But I know it's hard to do so. I did so for a key range in my essay and came right up against the length limit.

I'm sure you'll appreciate mine again, going even more fundamental than the DU for new foundations which should help ALL coherent models. I greatly look forward to your comments or questions.

Very best.

Peter

Satyavarapu Gupta

Respected Prof Piter Jackson,

Thank you for your Wonderful words of appreciation, and even on my English too...

Your words......

My reply.............

No no, I dont suggest from nothing!!!

You saw my paper on frequency up-shifting and energy to mass conversion in FQXi 2017 contest. That will be the answer...............

Your words.............

The only other thing I'd say is that it's a shame, given the space you had, not to expand on HOW the simulations refer to 'solve' the list you give. i.e. what derives the 'force behind expansion' which I've derivved with a soecific physical mechnism and shown the evidence (as well as it's entirely CYCLIC and time limited character!) So many will likely dismiss those as empty claims. But I know it's hard to do so. I did so for a key range in my essay and came right up against the length limit..................

My reply............

All those are solved papers published earlier, all papers are available in internet as well as in my blog.

You can select any of the topics or all of them one by one.... and we will discuss in any detail that is required.

Your words................

I'm sure you'll appreciate mine again, going even more fundamental than the DU for new foundations which should help ALL coherent models. I greatly look forward to your comments or questions........................

Please check your mail and your essay for my comments.

Best reagrds

=snp.gupta