Unravelling the Missing Physics behind Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability by Avtar Singh

Dear Avtar,

Despite it is a bit speculative and provocative, I like your Essay. I have a question: concerning Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle you wrote that there is no inherent uncertainty in nature insofar. But Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle is a consequence of a mathematical theorem of Fourier transforms. It is quite difficult to go against a mathematical theorem. How do you explain this issue?

In any case, I had fun in reading your Essay. Thus, I will give you a high score. Good luck in the Contest.

Cheers, Ch.

Respected Prof Avtar Singh Sir,

Thank you for your post in my Essay. I was working on Dynamic Universe Model for the last 40 years. Many books and papers were published. As this is N-Body problem solution none of the academicians in Physics appriciated my efforts. No one ever supported in my life.

I showed in my essay about the problems this model solved. Hope you read them. these were continuing even today. My Mail Id was removed from this forum two times.

People directly criticized indirectly stabbed on the back, i think you are well aware of these ...

I am a retired person from a steel plant in 2014, Non doctorate, main stream refused a seat in PhD for 'A' person like me. I dont have any earnings now except from my savings before 2014. What revenge I take with you sir?

Any way i am contacting FQXi for a rivision, hope you will reciprocate...

Best wishes to your essay sir

Best

=snp

Dear Singh, Sc. D., I read your informative essay and noticed that you paid a lot of attention to the Heisenberg certainty principle. In my essay I interpret this principle differently, so I chose you as an opponent to discuss my concept of the neocartesian generalization of modern physics, based on the principle of the identity of physical space and Descartes's matter, according to which physical space is matter, and matter is space that moves because it is matter.

I invite you to discuss my essay, in which I show the successes of the neocartesian generalization of modern physics, based on the identity of space and matter of Descartes: "The transformation of uncertainty into certainty. The relationship of the Lorentz factor with the probability density of states. And more from a new Cartesian generalization of modern physics. by Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich »

Dear Singh, Sc. D., at the very beginning of the essay you took the photon energy formula. It is acceptable to assume that this energy is equivalent to the mass of motion m, but it is not accepted to assume that the photon has a rest mass M, despite the fact that you have connected it with the wave packet that forms the particle. We still have to think about this. You are well done that you are handling the Lorentz transformation formulas in this way. Perhaps you can do something like Einstein, who treated them as he wanted. I give high ratings to those who visit my page and leave her comment on it regarding the neo-Cartesian generalization of modern physics, even if they did not agree.

Regards, Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich

Avtar,

Welcome back. I read your essay with great interest.

I can't pretend to fully understand the URM model but most of the concepts you present have always made more sense to me than orthodox QM theory. For some time I've been an adherent of the Penrose-Hameroff objective reduction concept, believing the Copenhagen interpretation too far-fetched and anthropocentric-based. Our ideas seem to parallel one another, mine w/o the cogent model URM. I also state the undiscovered 96% of the observed universe missing with the dominant theories, marvel about and pose the discovery of bridges between the classical and the quantum worlds, and when a better understanding of the quantum world could give us discovery epiphanies.

I plan to do a second reading whenever I can. I hope you get time to read mine.

Jim Hoover

Avtar,

I have commented on you essay but discovered I have not rated it yet. Time grows short so I am now rating it, being your 4th rating. My reason for mentioning this is that many ratings are 1s or 2s w/o comments. I remember I enjoyed reading your essay a few weeks ago.

Jim Hoover

Dear Avtar,

I greatly appreciated your work and discussion. I am very glad that you are not thinking in abstract patterns.

"The foundations of a wholesome science must be built upon a non-destructive observation method without truncation, deformation, or fragmentation of the relativistic continuum of the fundamental universal reality".

While the discussion lasted, I wrote an article: "Practical guidance on calculating resonant frequencies at four levels of diagnosis and inactivation of COVID-19 coronavirus", due to the high relevance of this topic. The work is based on the practical solution of problems in quantum mechanics, presented in the essay FQXi 2019-2020 "Universal quantum laws of the universe to solve the problems of unsolvability, computability and unpredictability".

I hope that my modest results of work will provide you with information for thought.

Warm Regards, `

Vladimir