Dear Satyavarapu,
Answers to your comment number 4.
The term matter particles is usually used to mean sub-atomic matter particles such as protons, neutrons, and electrons, etc. According to this definition, an atom is not a matter particle, but is a structure composed of matter particles joined together by their field structures to form a single larger scale entity. A molecule is a structure composed of atoms joined together by their field structures into a single larger scale entity. An energy photon is composed of two linear motion field particles joined together into a larger scale structure. It is often considered to be radiation, but the term radiation is also used to refer to matter particles that are emitted or radiated by atoms during fission reactions where large atoms split into two smaller atoms, etc. The use of the term radiation also leads to the idea that energy photons are just electromagnetic waves, but they are actually structures composed of two linear motions. One motion provides the photon's travel through three-dimensional space in some direction at the speed or motion amplitude called the speed of light and the other motion travels back and forth in the small fourth dimension and generates the photon's wave effects of frequency, wavelength, and dynamic mass effect.
No. This is how the external field of a matter particle or an atom is constructed. There are electric fields composed of the condensed flow of a large number of field particles caused by and/or that cause motions of electrons through a path, such as a wire, etc. or by the build up of a large number of electrons in a small area such as on the plate of a capacitor, etc. There are also magnetic fields, which are also composed of the condensed flow of a large number of field particles through a structure of a large number of atoms and/or molecules which have their internal and/or external fields aligned with each other to create a larger scale field particle flow. The idea that a photon is composed of a magnetic field that generates an electrical field that in turn regenerates the magnetic field for the next cycle as they both travel through space at the speed of light is not true. If you think about it, you should see that the concept includes two field entities, the electric field and the magnetic field. The basic materials that they are composed of and how the materials are structured within them are not defined. The method of how each one could generate the other one is also not defined.
No. This is a description of the structure of the fields that are generated in and bind a matter particle or an atom together. The solid, liquid, or gaseous states of matter are due to the interactions of kinetic motions with the larger-scale fields that hold molecules together.
Thank you.
Yes.
Close enough for this level of presentation.
The center of a matter particle can be looked at as the center of the particle's external field, which means that the attraction of the external field is equal in all directions at that point. As you move from the center point in some direction, the high-density field motion spheres in front of you get closer and exert more pressure on you to push you back toward the center. As you travel through these spheres in a direction away from the center, the density of field particles in each sphere that you travel through decreases from the previous sphere's density with the square of the distance from the center. This means that it is easier to travel through the spheres the farther you are from the center of the matter particle and the less pull effect they have on you.
Thank you.
It is due to the kinetic motion contained in the atoms and molecules of the medium and is usually continually being introduced into the system by energy photons of several different frequencies. When one of these kinetic motions interacts with the small object it transfers a small amount of kinetic motion to it causing it to move.
Yes. if the amount of kinetic motion received by a molecule during an interaction is great enough it will be greater than the binding field motions and the molecule will be broken down into separate atoms.
It is sort of the opposite in that it is the intermolecular fields that bind the molecules together which is what makes surface tension.
Good.
Thank you.
You are welcome.
Answers to your comment 5.
Good.
Yes.
Good.
You could be right about China and India because It appears that China desires to take over most of Asia as a first step of taking control over the whole world, but remember that it is all controlled by a few very rich families who are working to control everything for themselves. Of course, the conflict goes much higher than any in the earth and extends into those in the third heaven, but that is another level of understanding that goes well above what most here desire to know or believe. It is all a part of the Creator's work to give us the choice to choose whether to become parts of him or not and to let us see what the resulting world would be like without him in control of it all, but with man in charge instead.
This is all part of God's way of doing things. He made this creation to use it to make a body for himself to live in and he made us to become members or parts of his body if we choose to do so. All who choose to become joined to him as his body members are first given his Word, which puts down in them the desire to rule over others including the desire to rule over God. Once all rule has been put down, God the Father also comes into us and reveals his intents and shows us what he is doing and then we will know him and agree with his intents and do according to them what he desires. Once he has made all of his body members, he will destroy this temporary world and there will be a new and much better world where we will live and work in him without end. There is much more to it than that, of course, but that is a very short condensed and simplified version of it. If you want to know more like more detailed information about things or how to make that choice, etc. I can provide that information.
Answers to your second comment 5.
This appears to be a second copy of the same material, so no additional comment is needed.
Answers to your comment 6.
You are welcome.
No. Field particles do not contain any frequency or wavelength properties because they do not contain a fourth-dimensional motion. They cannot, therefore up shift a frequency that they do not possess.
It is good that you agree on this.
Yes, both electrons and neutrinos are matter particles and as such they both channel field particles through them to form their internal and external fields. When they contain kinetic motion and thus move in space, their fields travel with them. It is not that they are emitting the field particles in the sense that they are creating the field particles, but that they take in and concentrate existing field particles on one side, which then travel through them and come out on the other side to create their internal fields. This concentrated flow of field particles then creates their external field structures.
No. The fourth dimension is just another spatial dimension like the other lower three dimensions, except it is smaller and only partly connects to the lower three dimensions. It is three spatial positions long and only the middle position connects to the lower three dimensions. Time is not a dimension. We live in a motion continuum. The conditions of all the motions in the universe that were in existence, but no longer exist because the motions have now moved away from those positions to their current new positions is what we call the past. It did exist, but it no longer exists now because those motions have now moved into their current positions. Therefore, you cannot go back into the past because it no longer exists. The positions of all motions in the universe that they will be in, but are not yet in because they have not yet moved into those positions is the future, but we cannot go into the future because those motion conditions do not yet exist because the motions have not yet moved into them. We always exist in the present, which is composed of all the motions in the universe in their present positions. Since the motions continue to move, the present continues to change.
No, it is not infinity, it is just a place that is not connected to our three-dimensional world. If it is connected to anything (and it may not be connected to anything) there must not be anything there for it to interact with because if there were such things to interact with, we would be able to detect the loss of photons if they interacted with something there and gave up their fourth-dimensional motion to something in that other connected place. Yes, the velocity direction changes to the opposite direction when a motion in the fourth dimension reaches one end or the other of the fourth-dimension. The motion amplitude or speed remains the same because the end of the dimension can't receive any of the motion into itself, but reflects all of it in the opposite direction.
Good.
That is how man's current science concept explains the motion at ninety degrees to the direction of travel of the photon, but it is not how it actually works. It works in a much simpler way as described in the previous comment. A permanent magnet produces a continuous flow of field particles on a large scale because its internal structures have their internal field flows aligned with the inputs all in the same direction and the outputs aligned in the opposite direction. This magnetic field flow does not generate an electric field. If you hook up an oscilloscope to a copper wire and place it by the magnet, you may see an electrical current while you are moving the wire into its place beside the magnet, but once it is in place and not moving relative to the magnet you will see that it no longer generates an electrical field in the wire even though the field particles are flowing through the wire due to its proximity to the magnet. In order to get the generation of an electric field from the magnetic field, you have to introduce kinetic motion into the wire or the magnet, so that they move in relation to each other. If you do so, the electric field generated is in the form of electrons moving in the wire. Note that to make this work you need a matter structure with fields properly aligned in it and another matter structure that contains electrons that can move? If the energy photon contains an electric field, where is the electron flow and if it contains a magnetic field, where is the source of the magnetic field flow? Also, where is the source of its motion at the speed of light. If this is kinetic motion, what is it that is moving? If it is the fields that are moving, what are they made of that can support kinetic motion? These are the types of questions that nobody asks, but would be very important to know if the photon were composed of an electric and a magnetic field. It would be very important to understand what these fields were made of, how they were put together or structured, and how they operate. I have not seen any explanation of these things other than by using quantum theory that ends up saying that we don't know and can't ever know these things. On the other hand, I explain what energy photons are composed of, how that substance (motion) is structured or built up in them, and how that structure operates to generate the observed effects that are seen in their interactions with other entities. Here is another thing to think about. If you take two very strong one inch circular by 1 inch long permanent magnets and fasten one in the end of a nonmagnetic hollow plastic cylinder that is just large enough for the magnets to move in, but not large enough for them to rotate in and place the other one in the cylinder above it so that like poles of the magnets face each other, the one on top will float above the other one some distance that is determined by the strength of the magnets and by their weights. If the top one floats an inch above the other one, what is creating the pressure between them that keeps the one above the other one. If there are no field particles, it only seems to leave energy photons to do the job, but if it is energy photons, you should be able to place an antenna between the two magnets and interact with the photons as they travel the distance between the two magnets. You should be able to determine their frequency and wavelengths, etc. Even a virtual photon that is in existence only for a short time should be able to be detected if it is in existence long enough to travel the one inch between the magnets to interact with the other magnet. People tend to just blindly accept the theories without asking any of these types of questions.
Answers to your comment 7
It is about what basic matter particles like electrons are composed of, how that material (motion) is structured in them to make them function in interactions with other entities in the way that they do, and what makes them stable or unstable, etc. You probably have not seen any other explanation of how matter particles are made and how they operate, so you may not have anything to compare it to in man's current science level. Another little addition to what I gave to you in the comment would be to point out that antimatter particles are the same as matter particles except that their fifth-dimensional motion travels in the opposite direction in the fifth-dimension. When a matter particle and an antimatter particle interact with low kinetic motion levels, the angular motions of their fifth-dimensional motions are in the opposite directions and cancel out. This removes the angular motion necessary to allow their fourth-dimensional motions to travel back into the fifth-dimension, which results in all of that motion remaining in their fourth-dimensional motions, which results in their conversion into energy photons. Man calls this matter/antimatter annihilation.
Sincerely,
Paul
