Dear Satyavarapu,
I tried to go by your paragraphs, but I will include your comment that each of my comments applies to:
Answers to your comment 6.
Yours," Thank you for nice discussion / explanation."
You are welcome.
Yours, "Frequency upshifting happens here"
No. Field particles do not contain any frequency or wavelength properties because they do not contain a fourth-dimensional motion. They cannot, therefore, up shift a frequency that they do not possess.
Yours, "Well said, good analysis"
It is good that you agree on this.
Yours, "So, these field particles are less than in size of neutrinos probably. Even the motions in electrons, or neutrinos when in motion , will emit field particles."
Yes, both electrons and neutrinos are matter particles and as such they both channel field particles through them to form their internal and external fields. When they contain kinetic motion and thus move in space, their fields travel with them. It is not that they are emitting the field particles in the sense that they are creating the field particles, but that they take in and concentrate existing field particles on one side, which then travel through them and come out on the other side to create their internal fields. This concentrated flow of field particles then creates their external field structures.
Yours, "Well said, good analysis. Forth dimension is time is it not?"
No. The fourth dimension is just another spatial dimension like the other lower three dimensions, except it is smaller and only partly connects to the lower three dimensions. It is three spatial positions long and only the middle position connects to the lower three dimensions. Time is not a dimension. We live in a motion continuum. The conditions of all the motions in the universe that were in existence, but no longer exist because the motions have now moved away from those positions to their current new positions is what we call the past. It did exist, but it no longer exists now because those motions have now moved into their current positions. Therefore, you cannot go back into the past because it no longer exists. The positions of all motions in the universe that they will be in, but are not yet in because they have not yet moved into those positions is the future, but we cannot go into the future because those motion conditions do not yet exist because the motions have not yet moved into them. We always exist in the present, which is composed of all the motions in the universe in their present positions. Since the motions continue to move, the present continues to change.
Yours, "Other end is infinity, is it not? I think it is +/- velocity change......"
No, it is not infinity, it is just a place that is not connected to our three-dimensional world. If it is connected to anything (and it may not be connected to anything) there must not be anything there for it to interact with because if there were such things to interact with, we would be able to detect the loss of photons if they interacted with something there and gave up their fourth-dimensional motion to something in that other connected place. Yes, the velocity direction changes to the opposite direction when a motion in the fourth dimension reaches one end or the other of the fourth-dimension. The motion amplitude or speed remains the same because the end of the dimension can't receive any of the motion into itself, but reflects all of it in the opposite direction.
Yours, "Well said, good analysis"
Good.
Yours, "Well said, good analysis of Electromagnetic radiation transmission thro vacuum. They say the electrical field increase in x axis causes an induced magnetic field to be created in z direction after some time. That magnetic field causes an induced electric field in y direction, this electric field causes again magnetic field in z direction after some time. This way wave propagates...."
That is how man's current science concept explains the motion at ninety degrees to the direction of travel of the photon, but it is not how it actually works. It works in a much simpler way as described in the previous comment. A permanent magnet produces a continuous flow of field particles on a large scale because its internal structures have their internal field flows aligned with the inputs all in the same direction and the outputs aligned in the opposite direction. This magnetic field flow does not generate an electric field. If you hook up an oscilloscope to a copper wire and place it by the magnet, you may see an electrical current while you are moving the wire into its place beside the magnet, but once it is in place and not moving relative to the magnet you will see that it no longer generates an electrical field in the wire even though the field particles are flowing through the wire due to its proximity to the magnet. In order to get the generation of an electric field from the magnetic field, you have to introduce kinetic motion into the wire or the magnet, so that they move in relation to each other. If you do so, the electric field generated is in the form of electrons moving in the wire. Note that to make this work you need a matter structure with fields properly aligned in it and another matter structure that contains electrons that can move? If the energy photon contains an electric field, where is the electron flow and if it contains a magnetic field, where is the source of the magnetic field flow? Also, where is the source of its motion at the speed of light. If this is kinetic motion, what is it that is moving? If it is the fields that are moving, what are they made of that can support kinetic motion? These are the types of questions that nobody asks, but would be very important to know if the photon were composed of an electric and a magnetic field. It would be very important to understand what these fields were made of, how they were put together or structured, and how they operate. I have not seen any explanation of these things other than by using quantum theory that ends up saying that we don't know and can't ever know these things. On the other hand, I explain what energy photons are composed of, how that substance (motion) is structured or built up in them, and how that structure operates to generate the observed effects that are seen in their interactions with other entities. Here is another thing to think about. If you take two very strong one inch circular by 1 inch long permanent magnets and fasten one in the end of a nonmagnetic hollow plastic cylinder that is just large enough for the magnets to move in, but not large enough for them to rotate in and place the other one in the cylinder above it so that like poles of the magnets face each other, the one on top will float above the other one some distance that is determined by the strength of the magnets and by their weights. If the top one floats an inch above the other one, what is creating the pressure between them that keeps the one above the other one. If there are no field particles, it only seems to leave energy photons to do the job, but if it is energy photons, you should be able to place an antenna between the two magnets and interact with the photons as they travel the distance between the two magnets. You should be able to determine their frequency and wavelengths, etc. Even a virtual photon that is in existence only for a short time should be able to be detected if it is in existence long enough to travel the one inch between the magnets to interact with the other magnet. People tend to just blindly accept the theories without asking any of these types of questions.
Answers to your comment 7
Yours, "This analysis is about what central point? I did not understand
It is about what basic matter particles like electrons are composed of, how that material (motion) is structured in them to make them function in interactions with other entities in the way that they do, and what makes them stable or unstable, etc. You probably have not seen any other explanation of how matter particles are made and how they operate, so you may not have anything to compare it to in man's current science level. Another little addition to what I gave to you in the comment would be to point out that antimatter particles are the same as matter particles except that their fifth-dimensional motion travels in the opposite direction in the fifth-dimension. When a matter particle and an antimatter particle interact with low kinetic motion levels, the angular motions of their fifth-dimensional motions are in the opposite directions and cancel out. This removes the angular motion necessary to allow their fourth-dimensional motions to travel back into the fifth-dimension, which results in all of that motion remaining in their fourth-dimensional motions, which results in their conversion into energy photons. Man calls this matter/antimatter annihilation.
I hope that helps you to see which answer was for which of your comments.
Sincerely,
Paul