I greatly appreciated your work and discussion. I am very glad that you are not thinking in abstract patterns.
"The objectivity of such a world does not reside in the physical objects that are observedin three-dimensional space. Rather, it resides inthe parts of the conceptual tower and how they fit together. The tower hasits rotating cogwheels,likeamental mill, or aclock. True, this is another kind of clockwork universe than thatsuggested in the seventeenth century. Even so, it is not for us to decide how the conceptual clock tower operates in its abstract space, what the pieces look like and how they fit together. That cannot be changed by our wishes. We can still get crushed between itscogwheels. In that sense such auniverseisstill objective".
It is fine.
But he has keywords that can change the whole of science, how Maxwell changed science by creating his own equations, presenting his rotors in the form of simple cogwheel models.
Gerard't Hooft says of CA:
"We conclude that the most general model will be described as a set of simple periodic cogwheel models with varying periodicities."
While the discussion lasted, I wrote an article: "Practical guidance on calculating resonant frequencies at four levels of diagnosis and inactivation of COVID-19 coronavirus", due to the high relevance of this topic. The work is based on the practical solution of problems in quantum mechanics, presented in the essay FQXi 2019-2020 "Universal quantum laws of the universe to solve the problems of unsolvability, computability and unpredictability".
I hope that my modest results of work will provide you with information for thought.
Warm Regards, `