Vladimir Fedorov re-uploaded the file Fedorov_Fedorov_FQXi_2019_2_1.pdf for the essay entitled "Universal quantum laws of the universe to solve the problems of unsolvability, computability and unpredictability " on 2020-04-19 08:07:21 UTC.
Universal quantum laws of the universe to solve the problems of unsolvability, computability and unpredictability by Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov
Vladimir Fedorov re-uploaded the file Fedorov_Fedorov_FQXi_2019_2_1.pdf for the essay entitled "Universal quantum laws of the universe to solve the problems of unsolvability, computability and unpredictability " on 2020-04-19 08:07:27 UTC.
Vladimir, welcome back:
With my meager academic background in physics, Your expression of the universal quantum laws goes from very illuminating in your introduction to quite dense mathematically as it gets into the quantum states of the solar system structure. With the aid of googling, I can generally follow, but felt a need for a more complete conclusion to wrap up and couple the quantum interrelationships provided from the universal to our relatively puny solar system. I do find the Bohmian mechanics explanation more satisfying than the standard Copenhagen interpretation. The pilot wave view seems to open the door to related concepts in realms of physics like neuro-physics as well.
Enjoyed your essay. Hope you will try mine: https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3396
Jim Hoover
Dear Jim,
Thank you, glad you liked my work.
It's great that you always want to find the root of the problem:
"The modern human narrative is about breaking boundaries, those thought to bar us from movingbeyond. One of the barriers held our most modern form of humans to confinement to this planet".
"I do find the Bohmian mechanics explanation more satisfying than the standard Copenhagen interpretation. The pilot wave view seems to open the door to related concepts in realms of physics like neuro-physics as well".
"It is our own human multi-layered neural networks and their connection with naturewe must understand to seek truths and solve problems".
Your work deserves the highest praise. On the last day of the discussion, my rating will be given to you.
The events of recent months with COVID-19 have dramatically changed the world. The world will no longer be the same, because priorities have changed and values are being revised. Now, first of all, practical solutions are needed.
I decided to help doctors, biologists and chemists in the fight against COVID-19.
First of all, I formulated the primary task - to connect the universal laws of quantum mechanics with the properties of the connections of the coronavirus COVID-19 with human cells.
To do this, it is necessary to solve the problem of calculating the splitting levels for any spectral lines that are associated with the orbital pilot waves of molecular bonds.
But it turned out that in the universal formulas for calculating spectral lines (5), when they were converted into a convenient form, an error crept in my essay.
I fixed the error and replaced the file of my essay. It is good that this could be done before April 24th.
I ask everyone to excuse me for not being attentive.
Now, on the basis of the corrected formulas, I have formed universal formulas by which intermolecular bonds are calculated, and now it is up to the experiments with COVID-19 and human cells.
The idea of fighting COVID-19 is quite simple.
Since all interactions of the elements of matter occur at strictly defined frequencies of real pilot wave resonators, there is a dispersion mechanism of interaction between resonators that are close in frequency. This mechanism allows you to either stimulate (catalyst) or suppress (inhibitor) strictly defined bonds between molecules.
Such a dispersion interaction of the resonators is similar to a multi vibrator Yagi-Uda antenna. The resonant frequency of the reflector is shifted down by 5% (with a low Q factor of the resonators) and leads to complete suppression of radiation in the direction from the vibrator towards the reflector. And several directors, shifted up in frequency by 5% relative to the main vibrator, repeatedly amplify the radiation in their direction, in fact, pumping energy out of the main vibrator, shunting it and reducing its wave resistance.
Using the experience of constructing multi vibrator antennas, it was concluded that, in the optimal version of the antenna, many directors should have a monotonous reduction in size as they move away from the vibrator. Those. each sequentially removed director pumps out energy from a closer director, and they all optimally pump out energy from the vibrator.
A set of spectral splitting lines for any line calculated according to Rydberg's formula in quantum mechanics plays the role of directors, amplifiers, and stabilizers of spectral lines.
Nature is so arranged that to ensure its stability, the first pilot de Broglie waves of orbital electrons of intermolecular bonds necessarily form second pilot waves, which are elements of the electronic level of matter with a significantly longer wavelength (form lines according to Rydberg's formula) and which are able to transform through the phase of photons . This phenomenon is similar to the conversion of electron-positron pairs into photons, which can again form electron-positron pairs.
Those each stable pilot wave must move at a certain speed or be indignant at a certain equivalent speed in accordance with the formula for the de Broglie wave of an electron. The second pilot waves provide the necessary perturbation of the first pilot wave. Without the action of the second wave, the original pilot wave cannot exist and is annihilating. The fourth pilot waves de Broglie of electron support the second pilot waves of electron and form splitting lines with frequencies ranging from 100 MHz (wavelength 3 meters) to 10 GHz (wavelength 30 mm).
Thus, if the spectral lines of splitting of the fourth pilot waves are suppressed by irradiation with electromagnetic waves, then the first de Broglie pilot waves of the orbital electrons are suppressed, then the orbital electrons are forced to change their orbit, and the harmful connection of COVID-19 with human cells will break or collapse COVID-19.
All these phenomena are a consequence of universal quantum laws and the fractal structure of matter and can be used in neurophysics close to you. Because the above physical mechanisms of interaction between pilot waves are the basis for self-organization of matter and the work of neuron connections.
Warm regards,
Vladimir,
My rating is your 3rd. I tell you this since 2 of my 5 are a 1 and a 2 w/o comments.
Good luck and stay well.
Jim Hoover
Thanks for your comments and your interesting response.
Jim
14 days later
Dear Vladimir,
I read with great interest your essay with deep grounded ideas and calculations aimed at overcoming the crisis of interpretation and representation in the conceptual basis of fundamental physics. From the point of view of ontology, the concepts of wave and vortex are very important. A very important conclusion: "All observed phenomena are explained by a single entity and are calculated using universal quantum laws - these are only the first steps in the study of the Universe on the way to determinism." I believe that, step by step, overcoming the crisis of understanding in the basis of knowledge, fundamental physics will come to a unified picture of the world for physicists, mathematicians, cosmologists, biologists, information workers, poets and musicians. The only wish: to give from the very beginning the complete ontological structure of matter and its justification. Will there be a need for the concept of "physical vacuum"? I think the philosophical testament of Paul Florensky will be important here: "We repeat: worldunderstanding is spaceunderstanding / Повторяем: миропонимание - пространствопонимание." Carlo Rovelli is absolutely right: Physics Needs Philosophy / Philosophy Needs Physics .I wish you success!
With kind regards,
Vladimir Rogozhin
8 days later
I thank you for your comments on my page Vladimir...
I looked at the material on inactivating coronavirus, which looked interesting. My departed Physics mentor would have had a practical device online by now, doing something like you describe. Precise frequencies are key to targeting viral sites of attachment or whatever. Too much EMF in the air and some frequencies present may exacerbate the problem - rather than eliminating the virus. I would recommend a look at the impressive raft of info collected by Chris King.
The Covid-19 / SARS-CoV-2 Papers
I also looked at your latest comment above. I admire the work of Arnold Neumaier so I appreciate that reference. He is fairly cautious and dedicated to the constructivist view, so his work in general can be trusted. Did you know he worked with Brouwer? As to your comments from and about 't Hooft; I have personal experience of that discussion. I asked precisely that question of Gerard at FFP10 after reading that some theories (like LQG) might be falsified because they make predictions of unobserved Lorentz invariance violations.
So I inquired of professor 't Hooft if his CA-based theory was possible to confirm or disprove on the basis of similar experimental evidence. His initial answer was "it's too early to tell" with a brief explanation. But to my surprise, at FFP11 the following year; Professor 't Hooft devoted 4 or 5 slides in his talk to a discussion of the desirability of and the ultimate difficulty with creating Lorentz invariance as an emergent property of a discrete system.
So I can relate. More comment after reading the essay.
Best,
Jonathan
Honestly...
You give me a bit of information overload Vladimir. Your analysis is dense; which I mean both as a compliment and a critique. I would state that I am in high percentage agreement with a lot of what you set out, or I think I am, but it seems a bit defocused to allow more content in that may not be germane to the question the organizers set for us to grapple with. As with some of the professional scientists, a certain amount of specialized knowledge is assumed or required to fully assess your present work. Your presentation is direct and forceful, but in some cases it would be better framed as a proposal.
Even though not cited; it appears as though Sakharov's 1967 paper on how curvature could be attributed to quantum mechanical effects (induced gravity) contributed to your explanation for gravitation. Indeed; my Physics mentor was insistent that one could model the action of gravity as an unbalanced photon pair interaction. So I am not throwing out your ideas or saying they are wrong, only that you make the reader assume what you want them to believe in order to evaluate you fully.
I have come to some of the same conclusions as you, so we are largely on the same page, but I also have some questions or issues to raise. My feelings are mixed or perhaps I just have information indigestion. There is a lot to take in, in your essay, especially with the linked content. So a second reading will be required, and I'll be back to rate your paper either way.
All the Best,
Jonathan
Dear Vladimir,
Cpasiba vam balshoya, glya vas post , ya zabil Rusci yazik, ya bil va kiev glya 6 myasas in 1982.... I am sorry for many mistakes.
Thank you for picturesque essay, easily understandable. I gave the best ratings just now for your wonderful essay,
see my reply on my essay
Best
=snp
Dear vladimir,
Have look at my blog for further details on my papers and books....
" http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.com/2018/ "
Best
=snp
Dear Jonathan
I thank you for your comments on my page.
You are right, I said everything in the presentation of my essay, the rest is just an application.
This kind of "information indigestion" will probably be useful and there will be something left in head of everyone's to think about.
I could arrange the same "information indigestion" with elementary particles, but I chose the solar system so that I could visualize what each spectral line of an atom is in reality, where their analogues exist, instead of abstractions of quantum mechanics. And then it will be clear that the whole Universe functions according to unified quantum laws.
is a man of genius person, so he himself admits that he does not understand what people tell him about their theories and why they say it.
But he has keywords that can change the whole of science, how Maxwell changed science by creating his own equations, presenting his rotors in the form of simple cogwheel models.
Gerard't Hooft says:
"We conclude that the most general model will be described as a set of simple periodic cogwheel models with varying periodicities."
We need to ask him a question about the number of teeth in his gears. It is possible that he himself will think of the fact that there should be 137 pieces.
This will be a "shot from a cannon to top of a mountain to turn the potential energy of snow into an avalanche."
All the Best,
Dear Vladimir!
Just read your essay. We value your work to the maximum, we liked everything!
We wish you success!
Truly yours,
Pavel Poluian and Dmitry Lichargin,
Siberian Federal University.
Dear Vladimir,
Thank you for commenting on my essay, as a matter of of fact I was reading your essay just minutes before you commented.
I agree with your general comment that many of the essays don't really try to show any fundamental connection with the current physics, many are mere philosophical musing, some with"equations" but with a taste of numerology.
As to your idea I can see some thinking but I have not read it thoroughly since you have a lot equations. However, there is a similarity to my idea in the sense that mine automatically emphasizing wave length( which yours does the same), particularly, it shows that a wave of the size of classical electron radius carries energy of mc^2, when interaction is very weak. I will have more questions about your idea later. Thanks
Dear Vladimir
The second time I read your essay. It is not easy to understand.
Are neutrinos solitons?
What is the analogy of a hydrogen atom in another solar system that, for example, has only one planet. Exelent essay.
Regards,
Branko
Dear Branko,
Solitons are all elements of all levels of matter. All of them form gravispheres, which are potential wells. Neutrinos are usually called elements of the orbital electrons of the quark level of matter, which are, for example, elements of molecular bonds and which form orbital potential wells.
The function of the planets is to concentrate the energy of the environment of the physical vacuum in the star to minimize the energy of its interaction with high-speed flows of the environment. This function is similar to the function of electrons in an atom, to protect the nucleus from possible external disturbances.
The other solar system is different, for example, in the same way that the planetary system of Saturn is different from the planetary systems of Jupiter, Uranus, Neptune Mars, Venus and the Earth. Earth has one large satellite, unlike other planets. Universal quantum laws form many variants of gravispheres (potential wells), as well as many complex atoms.
Warm Regards,
Hello Validimir. Thanks for commenting on my essay. Your essay and your reply generated ideas on my part and I hope this reply will generate some new ideas for you. The first paragraph of your essay is true. The "... insufficiently substantiated axiomatic in physics" is the problem. In my essay I addressed that problem from a different point of view. My expertise is in creativity with a background in the physical sciences and mathematics. Creating new processes and chemicals based on natural processes/results was my field. So your equations, language and definitions are - to some degree- "foreign" to me. However, it seems to me that your "... single essence- a toroidal gravitational pilot wave is the same as the initiating vortex that became the Planck actions that became the space, time, mass, speed, direction variables/relationships that became the forms and functions of the original SSCU - described in the appendix of my essay. This original SSCU scaled up to become the physical universe and its contents. Your "... chaos is an order that we do not know about" is the precursor that becomes the vortex in the SSCU (your gravitational pilot wave). Also , in my theory, "all observed phenomena are explained by a single entity- the C*s to SSCU transformation- which creates and adheres to the universal quantum laws. I believe that, if you can "translate the essence of my theory into yours, you will see they are very similar in regards to the creation and functioning of the universe. I hope this will germinate some additional thoughts that are useful. Thanks again John
Dear Vladimir,
You wrote an interesting and provocative Essay deserving a high score. Restoring de Broglie's abstract probability waves, by giving them a real, physical meaning, could really be the root to realize a deterministic quantum mechanics, in the sense of your nice statement that ""chaos" is an order that we do not know about." Good luck in the Contest!
Cheers, Ch.
Dear Vladimir,
You achieve a strong method for fixing physics. There are many parts that are richly quotable. I decided to point attention to this pronouncement of yours:
"Fundamental πα-resonance (together with α-resonance) determines the parameters of limit elements for all levels of fractal matter and determines [t]he single synchronous grid of resonant frequencies [1, 2, 4, 5]. Resonant frequencies synchronize all processes and ensure the uniformity of the flow of time in the Universe."
I wish you success,
James A Putnam
May it amuse you Vladimir...
The attached image shows the Mandelbrot Butterfly turned inside out, unrolled about (-1,0i). This image clearly shows DeBroglie-Bohm atoms guided by pilot waves. The span from decoupling to the cold dark end of the cosmos runs from the top left edge to the center. Accordingly; you can see the action of gravity and also the different types of black holes embedded in a fractal spacetime background.
So some of what you have derived independently merely recapitulates what has been written in the outline of Mandelbrot Set since before the beginning of time. I learned how to create such images myself ~ 33 years ago. As it turns out; I also walked past the lab of Couder and Fort when attending FFP11, and I wondered at the hype and the low-tech gear. Little did I know. I only learned later what they were up to.
John Bush told me he could not see the resemblance, when I sent him the same image, but to me it is obvious. This image could be an illustration for some of what you write about.
Regards,
Jonathan