Thank you for your astute observation of "the structure of the dimensions as the bedrock from which everything arises", and for recognizing its relevance to my work with the UQs GEOMETRY MODEL.
If a distinction can be made between GEOMETRY MODEL... i.e. "structure"... as a configuration of graphic elements... e.g. nodes, lines, planes, volumes... and mathematically derived CONCEPTUAL 'ENTITIES" associated with the "structure"... e.g. "dimensions"... the mathematical operatives facilitated by the specified GEOMETRY MODEL can be used to verify conceptual validity, within the model.
In that a "dimension", as a conceptual "entity" will have properties that are geometry element configuration specific, a GEOMETRY MODEL, preferably as a 3D CAD environment, that facilitates an unbroken kinematic logic chain from observation to a single dimensionless point source of Fundamental Potential for Motion, must be derived prior to "dimensional" analysis of quantum mechanisms... i.e. a digitally quantized spatial environment that is not purturbative, facilitates a logic framework to visually confine conceptual "entities" to mathematical analysis that is not puturbative.
Properties of quantum systems... i.e. unperdictability, non-locality, randomness, and superposition... as perceived utilizing purtrabative observation and/or purtrabative mathematical analysis, may not survive analysis with a GEOMETRY MODEL that is not purtrabative.
The UQS 3D Geometry environment inherently facilitates several of the DQM extensions to QM.
For example, UQS Geometry facilitates function integration of two spatially independent channels... i.e. Inertia Channel and Radiation Channel... each comprised of contiguous 2D planar minimum/indivisible quanta of spatial occupancy (QI), which encapsulate channel function specific recursive volumes.
Within a UQS quantized 3D CAD environment, Inertia channel QI and Radiation channel QI, facilitate UQS Emission SIMulation of Causal Energy pulsed Fundamental Potential for Motion, from a single dimensionless point source... i.e. QI facilitate unique (x,y,z) addressing for emission and subsequent distribution of minimum/indivisible quanta of spatially defined Energy (QE).
A 3D node/spline Network channel... i.e.(a)"ether"?... as the quantization geometry of the UQS GEOMETRY MODEL, facilitates QE distribution intelligence.
Sir Roger Penrose, 2020 Nobel Physics Prize Recipient, is publically endorsing the notion that "Quantum Mechanics Needs a New Theory" but if "Quantum Mechanics", is to be associated with fundamental mechanisms of QE emission and distribution, then prior to a "New Theory", "Quantum Mechanics" needs a GEOMETRY MODEL that is not purtrabative.
Without an association to a specified GEOMETRY MODEL, conceptual and/or mathematical assessments tend be temporal, and due to the corruptible nature... i.e. dynamic instability... of semantics, symbolic and/or linguistic, an academic necessity for interpretation classification has generated unresolvable terminology issues that are inhibiting an "Emergent Quantum Theory". REF: Klaas Landsman FQXi 2019-2020 Essay
If (a)"ether" as "the fabric of the dimensions provides a very different transmitting medium", then perhaps the term (a)"ether" is synonymous with the "root architecture of cosmic intelligence"`~ sl?
"All matter originates and exist only by virtue of a force... and we must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. The (that) mind is the matrix of all matter." ~ Max Planck, Quanta Author and Physicist
Thanks again Jonathan, for introducing me to DQM, and for your patience with my slow acknowledgement of its significance, and similarities with UQS.