Hi Jonathan,
I was able to read your essay recently. I enjoyed it, but I haven't gotten a chance to comment on your page yet. I haven't gotten to Connes paper yet, but it does sound like I will appreciate it. I like that idea of reflecting on what was recently read.
Jaime Keller's story does sound a bit similar to mine. I was a Chemistry major before switching to Physics haha.
I will comment on your paper soon.
All the best,
Ernesto
Yes, I have a feeling some people can be very harsh with their ratings, but I'm not sure why. I read on someone else's essay thread that someone rated their paper a 3/10 and called it one of the best rating they've given. So a lot of it has to do with who see the essay I suppose, whether they are harsh or not, or possibly not participating completely honestly, and giving essays worse ratings than they deserve. I don't see much of a solution to it other than to continue to encourage honest criticism.
Sincerely,
Ernesto
Dear Ernesto Vaca!
We are happy to inform you that we have rated your work 10 points. We share the initial assumptions made in the article. We like Max Tegmark's idea. But in the world there is something called GENESIS. And there is what is called TIME. Therefore, we believe that the very principles of mathematics need a deeper clarification. For example, Hegel tried to see the genesis in logic. We think it makes sense to look for the genesis in mathematical structures.
We wish you a successful scientific work!
Truly yours,
Pavel Poluian and Dmitry Lichargin,
Siberian Federal University.
I apologize for the late reply, if you are even still paying attention to my page, but thank you so very much! It is very encouraging. If you come back to this, are you speaking of genesis of our universe? What do you feel needs to be clarified about the principles of mathematics?
Thank you again,
Ernesto