World-Universe Model – Alternative to Big Bang Model by Vladimir Netchitailo

Vladimir Netchitailo

Essay Abstract

This manuscript provides comparison of the Hypersphere World-Universe Model (WUM) with the prevailing Big Bang Model (BBM) of Standard Cosmology. The performed analysis of BBM shows that the Four Pillars of the Standard Cosmology are model-dependent and not strong enough to support the model. The angular momentum problem is one of the most critical problem in BBM. Standard Cosmology cannot explain how Galaxies and Extra Solar systems obtained their substantial orbital and rotational angular momenta, and why the orbital momentum of Jupiter is considerably larger than the rotational momentum of the Sun. WUM is the only cosmological model in existence that is consistent with the Law of Conservation of Angular Momentum. To be consistent with this Fundamental Law, WUM discusses in detail the Beginning of the World. The Model introduces Dark Epoch (spanning from the Beginning of the World for 0.4 billion years) when only Dark Matter Particles (DMPs) existed, and Luminous Epoch (ever since for 13.8 billion years). Big Bang discussed in Standard Cosmology is, in our view, transition from Dark Epoch to Luminous Epoch due to Rotational Fission of Overspinning Dark Matter (DM) Supercluster's Cores. WUM envisions Matter carried from the Universe into the World from the fourth spatial dimension by DMPs. Ordinary Matter is a byproduct of DM annihilation. WUM solves a number of physical problems in contemporary Cosmology and Astrophysics through DMPs and their interactions: Angular Momentum problem in birth and subsequent evolution of Galaxies and Extrasolar systems - how do they obtain it; Fermi Bubbles - two large structures in gamma-rays and X-rays above and below Galactic center; Diversity of Gravitationally-Rounded Objects in Solar system; some problems in Solar and Geophysics [1]. WUM reveals Inter-Connectivity of Primary Cosmological Parameters and calculates their values, which are in good agreement with the latest results of their measurements.

Author Bio

Vladimir S. Netchitailo, the author of more than 150 published papers, is a Doctor of Sciences in Physics. He belongs to the school of physicists established by Alexander Prokhorov - Nobel Prize Laureate in Physics. Dr. Netchitailo has developed a new Cosmological model that he dubbed Hypersphere World - Universe Model (WUM) that attempts to explain the World from its creation on, both on micro and macro scale. WUM provides a mathematical framework that allows calculating the primary cosmological parameters of the World that are in good agreement with the most recent measurements and observations.

Download Essay PDF File

Satyavarapu Gupta

Respected Professor Vladimir Netchitailo,

You developed a wonderful model WUM! It is having No singularities, time is a Factor of the World, No bigbang Singularity, The radius of the Nucleus of the World is increasing with speed ?, Multicomponent Dark Matter (DM), Ordinary matter, DM comes from the Universe to the Nucleus along the fourth spatial dimension. Ordinary Matter is a byproduct of DM annihilation....

Very nice concepts!

You can see some similar concepts in my essay also, Hope you can have a visit...

Best Regards

=snp

Vladimir Rogozhin

Dear Vladimir,

I read with great interest your essay with deep analytics, substantiated ideas and conclusions aimed at overcoming the crisis of understanding in the foundations of knowledge, in solving the problem of the "beginning" and its ontological structure. You give a reasonable alternative to the so-called "Big Bang Model of Standard Cosmology". I wonder who called this model "standard"?

I believe this is one of the extremely important conclusions: "Any theory of evolution of the Universe that is not consistent with the Law of Conservation of Angular Momentum should be promptly ruled out."

You give a very important quote by A. Einstein: "When forced to summarize the theory of relativity in one sentence: time and space and gravitation have no separate existence from matter".

I believe that from the point of view of the ontological foundation of the model, you make a very important conclusion: "There are no Fundamental Physical Constants in WUM."

Despite the fact that I have a slightly different view of the ontological structure of matter and space, I appreciate the main thing - a strong intellectual and scientific alternative to "Big Bang Model of Standard Cosmology".

I wish you success in further research and the advancement of your alternative model. Only one wish: deepen the ontology of the model. It is always good to recall here the philosophical precepts of Albert Einstein and John Archibald Wheeler:

"At the present time, a physicists has to deal with philosophic problems to a much greater extent than physicists of the previous generations. Physicists forced to that the difficulties of their own science "...

"Philosophy is too important to be left to the philosophers."

Philosophical question: Can Humanity develop steadily if there was an incomprehensible big bang in the "Beginning"? ... I hope that someday physicists, mathematicians, cosmologists, biologists, information workers, poets and composers will have a single picture of "LifeWorld" (E.Husserl).

I invite you to see my ideas .

With kind regards,

Vladimir

Ilgaitis Prusis

Dear Vladimir,

Thank you for your interesting essay.

I have some remarks about emergence of Universe.

The Universe can also occur without BB. Emergence of Universe from nothing is disclosed in:

Big Bang without Bang. http://viXra.org/abs/1901.0037

Before Big Bang. http://viXra.org/abs/1901.0141.

In this case no problems with conservation laws (angular momentum etc.). No problems with accelerating expansion of Universe: Universe Self Inflation without Dark Energy. http://viXra.org/abs/1806.0262.

More over, this explains the absence of antimatter in the Universe: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330986087_Hypothesis_of_Tetraverse

Best regards

Ilgaitis