Dear Vladimir,

Thank you so much for the high estimation. It is also very important that you underline the holistic aspect in the process of algorithmic ontology simulation. The social community is now far ahead from the time of simplistic explanations, and we are glad to join this community job. We hope that this essay could be understood by the researcher involved in different branches of investigation, for us to involve the summarizing in the general philosophical outlook, a bit deeper that it was before. We are glad to study these things deeper jointly in collaboration with the profound society.

Truly yours,

Pavel Poluyan and Dmitry Lichargin,

Siberian Federal University.

Dear Doctor Sitnikova,

Thank you so much for your high estimation of our research. We highly estimate the importance of been demanded by the reader of our results. We also would like to stress upon the idea that the time is not a clear and transparent issue even now, and probably it will stay to be largely undiscovered, because the comprehension of the deeper meaning of the reality is infinite, and that is very optimistic, because time cannot ever stop for any observer (consciousness).

Best Regards,

Pavel Poluyan and Dmitry Lichargin,

Siberian Federal University

Dear Alyssa,

We would like to thank you for your high estimation of our work. Probably, the analytical world you are talking about is just like a rainbow that has separated colors within the viewer focuses enjoying the brightness of the holistic white light of this perfect world. In the world perceived as it is we have a deep continuum of matter full of individual phenomena, information and unconditional meaning. So, the material union of the world does not anyhow deny the information and the fact that idealist and materialism are two equal ways of perceiving the nature. Our human mind and perception can feel pure ideas, that makes human the subject if reality, the target of all the systems existence, including social, authoritative, cultural and so on and on.

Best Kind Regards,

Pavel Poluyan and Dmitry Lichargin

Siberian Federal University

6 days later

Dear Pavel Vadimovich Poluian

Thanks for the comment on my forum. I believe we mean the same thing. When you say: essential mathematics (the language of God) I mean discovered mathematics. When you say: mathematics for modeling - human language, I say invented mathematics. The first is responsible for the universe and us in it.

Regarding your essay, my experience is that some problems do not even need to be posed and therefore not to solve. Thus, for example, the problem of the shape of the universe is a fictional problem. The universe has no shape. The problem of the number of dimensions is also unnecessary. In my mathematical universe I function quite well without dimensions with only three properties mass, radius and time. Some even think that two properties are enough. You deal with time a lot in your essay. It is specific, which can be viewed in two ways. As the inverse value of the frequency, it is, like the frequency, limited. But if we understand it as the flow of time, we get that the universe is eternal, without beginning and end, than it is not limited.

Regards,

Branko

    Pavel

    A new era dawns.聽 Old questions become quaint and historical.聽 Is the whole community ready?聽 Or is physical reality too dangerous for our collective understanding at this time?聽

      Dear Pavel and Dimitry,

      thanks for steering me towards your essay! I don't have much time for an in-depth comment right now, but I wanted to point out that it seems your approach is 'Gödelian' in quite another way from many of the other essays in this contest---fellow contestant Hippolyte Dourdent, in his article, quotes the great logician as saying that "time is the means by which God

      realized the inconceivable that P and non-P are both true"---a lesson which seems to get to the heart of your approach.

      It also seems to me that there is an interesting relationship between your 'areal sets' and the notion of complete sets of commuting observables in quantum mechanics---in the sense that, if a system has a definite value within the observables of one such set, it fails to have a definite value for all others. For instance, an electron having a definite value of spin for one particular direction (and consequently, having a definite value for all observables commuting with the spin-operator in that direction), fails to have a definite value for spin in all other directions.

      Also, I quite liked the entry point you chose for your essay---St. Augustine is not somebody you expect to meet in such a contest. But then again, it was him who said about what time is, "if no one asks me, I know; if I wish to explain to him who asks, I know not". Perhaps, still, not entirely inappropriate.

      Good luck in the contest!

      Cheers

      Jochen

        Dear Alexandra Alexandrovna!

        Thanks for your feedback. What is your opinion on other essays? Who do you recommend to see?

        Sincerely, Pavel Poluian

        Dear Alyssa Adams!

        I carefully read your essay "Who Wants to be a Millionaire? A Guide to Computing Complex Systems". Thanks for the interesting essay! This is essentially a bold original article for an important newspaper!

        I liked your unexpected association of the current pandemic with the collapse of the financial market. At the 2018 World Philosophical Congress in Beijing, I publicly said: "Soon the world will face a financial crisis. It will be a controlled demolition of the stock market. Market makers want to destroy fictitious capital. For`s this purpose the threat of war is organized!"

        Before that, I wrote several articles about the fact that they will try to mask the coming economic crisis with international military conflicts. But I did not imagine that they use a pandemic scarecrow for this. Let's hope that all these experiences will remain in the past.

        Otherwise, our views are similar. You are also looking for algorithms and calculations in the objective world around us. Yes, it's clear that in a flying fly, very specific calculations take place that control the flight. But what calculations take place in the solar system? It is known that Newton believed that the solar system is unstable, and God constantly intervenes, controlling and coordinating the movement of all the planets. Laplace proved that there are certain mechanisms that determine stability. Can these feedback mechanisms be called computation?

        I wish you success in your scientific work!

        Sincerely, Pavel Poluian.

        Dear Jochen!

        Thank you very much for the praise and valuable comments. We will definitely use them in future work. Currently, we are developing a startup project where a new fundamental ontology is being developed, which allows integrating ontologies of subject areas.In the world there is something called GENESIS. And there is what is called TIME. Therefore, we believe that the very principles of mathematics need a deeper clarification. For example, Hegel tried to see the genesis in logic. We think it makes sense to look for the genesis in mathematical structures.

        We wish you a successful scientific work!

        Truly yours,

        Pavel Poluian and Dmitry Lichargin,

        Siberian Federal University.

        Pavel,

        Fascinating and original view, well considered and also well presented.

        I've spent much time on time, recently circumnavigating with a rubidium oscillator to confirm H&K plus more. I have a model explaining why east and west acceleration have the opposite effect on oscillation rates, not inconsistent with your approach. Do you have a rationale?

        Thank you.

        Peter

          Dear Prof Pavel Poluyan and Dmitry Lichargin,

          Thank you for wonderful words and liking my essay. I also liked essay, Mine was the first comment on your essay about a month back.

          I gave you best rating to your essay today

          We will be contacting by mail. I set a mail, please check

          Best Wishes to your essay

          =snp

          Dear Peter!

          Thank you for your interesting comment. We have no answer to your question about accelerations... Whether the metric of space-time is non-ideal? Can we say that the distances between points are variable and change stochastically? Is a perfect ball possible in mathematics? Is this our planet Earth?

          Pavel Poluian and Dmitry Lichargin,

          Siberian Federal University.

          Dear Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta!

          Thank you for your message!

          Pavel Poluian and Dmitry Lichargin,

          Siberian Federal University.

          Dear Branko!

          Thanks for the clarification. Yes, we think the same about two types of mathematics. Just like you. The number of dimensions of space depends on the objective situation that we are modeling. For example, in the theory of relativity four dimensions of Minkowski arose. Regarding the limitations of the Universe in space and time, we believe that Immanuel Kant is right - and the question of finiteness-infinity reveals the boundary of our concepts.

          We are always glad to talk about such issues. Thanks you!

          Truly yours,

          Pavel Poluyan and Dmitry Lichargin,

          Siberian Federal University.

          Dear Pavel and Dmitry,

          I greatly appreciated your work and discussion. I am very glad that you are not thinking in abstract patterns.

          While the discussion lasted, I wrote an article: "Practical guidance on calculating resonant frequencies at four levels of diagnosis and inactivation of COVID-19 coronavirus", due to the high relevance of this topic. The work is based on the practical solution of problems in quantum mechanics, presented in the essay FQXi 2019-2020 "Universal quantum laws of the universe to solve the problems of unsolvability, computability and unpredictability".

          I hope that my modest results of work will provide you with information for thought.

          Warm Regards, `

          Vladimir

            Dear Pavel and Dmitry,

            Very original essay, well written and explained. I appreciate the intention to put time back in physics, which you attempt with many interesting ideas and connect with computability and computational complexity. Thank you, and good luck in the contest!

            Cheers,

            Cristi

              Dear Cristi Stoica!

              Thank you so much! We will be happy to maintain scientific contacts and cooperation!

              Pavel and Dmitry

              Dear Pavel and Dmitry,

              Thanks for your appreciation and your interesting question in my blog - where I tried to answer.

              I read you essays with great interest and you made me appreciate the algorithmic approach to physics. So a few questions remain for me and I hope these might be interesting for you:

              1. You seem to accept unchangeable fundamental laws, that are not algorithmic. Why do you need these? Is the aim of your approach just to describe emergent mesoscopic laws (which of course is also very interesting).

              2. You seem to have two kind of times. One in the fundamental laws and one in the algorithmic laws. How are they connected to each other?

              3. Is the areal set constant trough time? Meaning it contains all possible states the universe or some system can ever take. Or can it change and is open to evolution? If yes is this change also described by some algorithm?

              4. The areal set structure seem to correspond to a classical boolean logic. How does quantum mechanics plays into this. In QM the boolean logic comes into play, when measurements come into play or/and when contexts are set. In this domain only probabilistic laws can be formulated. If one wants deterministic laws, the unitary evolution of the wave function has to be considered. But there the boolean logic does not apply.

              Hope these questions make sense to you.

              Best luck in the contest.

              Luca