Welcome, dear reader.
Permit me to make some clarifications to aid your appreciation of my thesis. Here, precisely, is the question:
Is GГ¶del's mathematical "Undecidable" Landauer's physical "Entropy"/limit?
Might we on this basis then model every mind as being own authentic holographic event horizon?
This will be in the understanding that GГ¶del's undecidability actually is physically speaking Planck's natural unit; and defining every mind typically thus as own authentic "Planck charge" i.e. quantum vacuum.
Answering in the affirmative, we attempt presently to model the mind i.e. the observer proper as own quantum of the observable(s) and "Matter" (the observable) as altogether the associated interference Pattern.
This will suggest that in modern electromagnetism every mind is to be as a definition physically own unit refractive index (constant refractive index) i.e. own quantum or vacuum proper (v = E/h) of Planck's theory. This we call presently the quantum vacuum (hitherto perhaps the harmonic oscillator or cosmological constant or free space).
Now, this assumption should lead us ultimately to the kind of non-linear electromagnetism of Yang-Mills theory such that it is the interference pattern or self-referential "split" of a quantum vacuum that qualifies as its pair production (its spectrum of non-commuting observables).
Pair production in the specific case of non-linear electromagnetism should give rise then to a kind of relativity of the elementary charge strictly of the Dirac quantum of charge or of the modern mass gap (implying what is known typically as "consciousness"/observables).
We must think then of the mass gap (elementary charge) as the nth harmonic i.e. as the minimal amplitude of our quantum vacuum or fundamental frequency (harmonic oscillator).
Every nth harmonic must double, therefore, as the natural unit of time i.e. as the observable light cone so that (Д§/E) = в€љ(kД§) = в€љ(Д§/О»c). Wherein k is the wave vector or phase constant, E is our probe energy a.k.a. the mind, О»c is the associated Compton wavelength and Д§ is Dirac's constant.
Over all, answering our question above in the affirmative will mean that we explain differently Dirac's magnetic mono-pole so that it is closer to Einstein's null geodesic or light cone (space-time manifold); closer indeed to the surface area of Gauss' law.
This in turn brings in the possibility that every mind is to be modelled as being own authentic holographic event horizon.
I hope that this clarification aids towards disposing with you my burden of proof.
Your candid questions are welcome.
Chidi Idika