Essay Abstract
We are made of math. All of it, especially uncountable. Thus thru real-numbered uncountable processes and ideas we're able to know, feel, understand and live.
Author Bio
Mathematician for life
Essay Abstract
We are made of math. All of it, especially uncountable. Thus thru real-numbered uncountable processes and ideas we're able to know, feel, understand and live.
Author Bio
Mathematician for life
Dear Luis F Patino
Yes,
we are made of math.
Regards,
Branko
Dear Luis F Patino,
I should say math is for us to use...
Best
=snp
Sure we are just math. But where do we draw the line between math and reality. Now we can say or define 1 or a bit or a single component is the basis of reality. But when we include a second component everything blows up. You have the same problem with math. When you compute with ones and zeros again it all blows up. To be honest in math you must for example compute with ones only (no null space holders). I do strongly approve your thesis. We are made of math; we are not programs.
Dear Luis F Patino,
Thank you for your interesting essay.
In my essay, I also reach a similar conclusion. That is reality is identical to the entire hierarchy of infinity. I would greatly appreciate it if you kindly give me some feedbacks on it.
Best regards,
Agus
Dear Luis F Patino,
What do you think about the quantum natural number inspired by Kochen-Specker theorem? In this context, the computational perspective on math seems to be written. However, is this enough for creation of math? For example, in my essay, the random number generator in the context of computation was discussed.
Best wishes,
Yutaka
Dear patio. Great work from You. very well simplified.Rated you well. kindly pass by https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3525 for a review. thanks and all the best in the contest.
A wonderful short paper!
I especially liked the reference to Gaifman, which I will have to read in full later. I am in almost complete agreement with your premises and your conclusions. I think it is all Maths, and not just the subset convenient to physicists, that set the tone for reality. So I like what you say a lot.
The way what you prove links back to the essay question could have been more explicit. I gave you high marks anyway, but there is not enough content for full credit. You could have taken the idea further with benefit, although the brief version did make me think.
Thanks for an enjoyable read Luis.
All the Best,
Jonathan
I wanted to ask...
It appears you are trying to say that the result of Turing and of Gödel actually implies our free will, not what people assume it to mean. Is that correct?
Jonathan