Reality is a simple mathematical structure literally, hence computable by Adel Hassan Sadeq

Dear Adel Hassan Sadeq

I like and completely agree with your title.

I agree with your next view because I came to the same conclusion.

This structure had to be simple, basic but showed all the present physics in a clear and COHERENT way. That is, what are space, time, mass, charge, spin, interaction and most of all why the electron, the proton and "photons" exist. They should be interrelated aspects of a fundamental system.

I would not say:

That is only "LENGTH" appears as a dimension and all other units become dimensionless because L=T and M=L^-1 (better LтЙИT and MтЙИL^-1).

It would be good if you used your approach to show any prediction, then it would be easier for readers to recognize the value of your Fundamental Theory Of Reality. This way, many see only dimensional mismatch.

You can see dimensionless predictive formulas in my essay with great accuracy. But I can't reduce everything to space (length), which should be a hard-to-reach goal.

BTW, with Ru─'er Bo┼бkovi─З forces ere connected to the radius so you too are on the right track, which few can understand.

Regards,

Branko

Dear Adel Hassan Sadeq

Nice thought provoking essay with a correct title!!

I accept your ideas . I want to say that Dynamic Universe Model is also based totally on reality and deduced many new predictions that came true later.

Hope you will visit my page "A properly deciding, Computing and Predicting new theory's Philosophy" confirm the truth that is mentioned here

Best

=snp

Hi

Thanks visiting my essay,

Some of your concepts are very good!

I want to discuss with you later even, Do you have a mail ID?

Best

=snp

Dear sadeq. Thanks for the good essay. I appreciate your foundational thoughtfulness.I have rated your good work. Can cognitive bias be key to answering the origin of he 3us ?please read my thoughts here-https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3525.Thankyou and All the best in the essay contest.

Dear Adel Hassan Sadeq

Glad to read your work again.

I greatly appreciated your work and discussion. I am very glad that you are not thinking in abstract patterns.

"a new coherent interpretation of QM that does away with the enigmatic probability interpretation"

While the discussion lasted, I wrote an article: "Practical guidance on calculating resonant frequencies at four levels of diagnosis and inactivation of COVID-19 coronavirus", due to the high relevance of this topic. The work is based on the practical solution of problems in quantum mechanics, presented in the essay FQXi 2019-2020 "Universal quantum laws of the universe to solve the problems of unsolvability, computability and unpredictability".

I hope that my modest results of work will provide you with information for thought.

Warm Regards, `

Vladimir

Thank you for your interesting essay. I have already read it and evaluated it earlier-very positively. Nevertheless, even if you admit indisputable cogency of all this reasoning, you will remain in the sphere of philosophical metaphysics. To fall outside the limits one needs to find the means of expressing new ontology in the language of universally acknowledged scientific theories. The path you have chosen is very difficult. I wish you success on this path!

Dear Professor Adel Sadeq,

Thank you for drawing attention to your essay!

The claim you had discovered that mathematical structure underlying our reality is very strong and beyond my scope of education to even comment on.

I hope, however, more knowledgeable people than I can verify your claims and comment on the technical material.

Best Wishes,

Raiyan Reza

The link to the PDF file is broken.

Nevermind, my mistake.