A Scientific American endorsement of Joe Biden is a sure sign that the science community is suffering from mental illness.
Global Collaboration
Scientific American is endorsing this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTtABxyqIUk
I have seen his personality and program he is educated and seems a good person, you are republican and for trump, it is not a reason to not recognise the skillings of others
Steve, you are either fabricating or you're not very bright.
well, detail us why he is not good and why trump is better, be concrete and analyse well why, we wait
President Trump puts America and Americans first. Furthermore, he gets an awful lot accomplished including peace in the Middle East.
the education sometimes is essential and when the democracy and the universalism and logic are there , that helps, trump is a business man who has heritated I beleive all his money from his grandmother, we cannot judge the persons in function of their monney but for their skillings
explan us what he has changed in your life and what he has made in your country and for the world in resume, your life has changed ?
President Trump loves America. He demonstrates this by protecting our freedoms, our heritage, our culture, our borders.
Trump has diligently worked to provide new pharmaceuticals at lower costs, ventilators, and tests to protect us from Covid 19. Trump is also has the pharmaceutical companies pursuing a cure.
Trump is responsible for destroying ISIS and killing high ranking terrorist generals in Iran.
Trump is initiating progress towards putting a woman on the Moon and Mars.
Ok, I have personally nothing against him, I beleive that a president must think indeed about his country and help also globally . So for me he must improve what he can for the people , in improving the educational system, the ecology, helping the agriculture, create enterprises and check correctly them also to evitate the pollutions or others, he must try to reform the system also with new adapted laws, he must improve the social security, he must be diplomatic globally and try to find solutions . So I find this well for ISIS because indeed they are crazy ,it is well also for the pharmaceutical system a thing that I d like to insist is that all the presidents love their vcountry and must think about it first, all they make this, I remember your past good presidents like obama, Lincoln, clinton, Regan, Kennedy and others, they were good presidents for me. We live in a modern world and they must be responsible. An other thing is that the changement is well , so it is always well to have a new president having new ideas , Trump has had his time and has the time to put into practice his ideas, so it is well to give the keyus in new hands , a president loving the USA and having local and global solutions of improvements.
Global Collaboration will require multinational cooperation and agreements. The stresses on the environment and especially renewable resources have dramatically increased in the last 50 years which has seen more than a doubling of world population. Given that number, one could expect to project an exponential increase in demand on resources but it has been much more due to the rapid industrialization of what during the Cold War were emerging mechanized states or third world stagnate economies which entailed half of the global population just 30 years ago. The current degeneracy towards nationalistic and totalitarian regimes bodes ill for rational efforts to collaborate among many otherwise willing nations caught between 'the rock and the hard place' of national ambition and resource bases. And underlying the global strategims today is the very physical reality which was the true motivation of the Cold War. While the modus operandi was a political philosophic and economic model contest, the truth is that not even Stalin wanted a global, expensive competition for control and/or influence over regions of the Globe. When he came to power 'The Internationale' was discarded and making Russia a great power was his sole purpose, and external harrassment campaigns continued along the lines established by Dzerzhinsk. But 8 months prior to the outbreak of WWII, Lise Meitner published in the British journal 'Nature' and the world scientific community discovered that nuclear fission was possible and vast amounts of energy could be released.
There must be a world consensus on nuclear power, and that must include rational restraints, for the very simple and physical reason that for there to be nuclear technologies, there must be available a finite (and very rarified) amount of fissionable material. The Cold War was driven by the necessity to control regions of the world where prospects were good in finding viable deposits of uranium and thorium ores. And that hasn't changed.
jrc
The arguments against laissez-faire merchantile policies stand on their own, yet are always attacked as 'socialist' or 'communist' by those whom benefit or seek to benefit from market forces knowing that unregulated market forces always favor those whom already are in an advantageous position. Where efforts to counter laissez-faire policies often fail is in attempts to 'micro-manage' regulatory processes with a result of unmanageable complexity. In modern western nations, the potpourri of pork barrel politics has led to such a log-jam of contrary qualifications that it takes a host of credentialed, certified professional specialists (charging professional level fees) just to sell a house. The cost of due diligence has gone through the roof. Add to that the anti-regulatory climate of the financial industry and we have the largest lenders being given discount rates to lend down through the tranches to retail banks, creating an exponential increase in demand for the government to issue even more money to meet the cost of interest payments, warranties, fees and penalties; and absolutely no simple and clear requirement that gives tax and investment incentive for that borrowed money to be spent on revitalizing a production base for the economy. The only thing that constitutes wealth is the production of durable goods. And in a world which standardized to the metric system at the time of the civil war between the States, that production is only exportable if its in metric sizes. jrc
Scientific American's editorial can be read @
https://scientificamerican.com/article/scientific-american-endorses-joe-biden
well Jason, you continue to tell stupidities , so I delete. We are not against the capitalism and I am not an atheist, so stop to tell ironical things of child now, are you able to discuss correctly , you are not relevant Jason you know, you repeat an ocean of extremist thoughts and you are not made for this group, well so I repeat , all will be deleted when it is odd , thanks
Thanks John for sharing, I agree, the responsabilities also of multinationals , lobbies are essential , the leadership so becones important , we need a kind of global wisdom in the governances and in all centers of interest at my opinion, it seems to be a foundamerntal key.
Steve, you need to doubt your motives; they are filled with negativity. Analyze your motives and make them pure.
Steve, I believe in freedom, peace and prosperity. If you call me an extremist, then YOU have a problem.
I have explained to stop to tell stupidities due to your vanity and anger, now stop, respect the rules, we are not on facebook, read what Sloan and Merali have told, stop now you car , try to respect the rules and work your vanity wich eats you and the revenge, we are not in a game of playstation, thanks for your understanding, you are too much negative and odd
yoyu are not special in thinking in these things, I am for the democracy, the freedom , the prosperity, the peace, and for this we must change and improve the global system because we know that it lacks foundamental parameters
Steve,
Taking away gun rights is not freedom. Therefore you are NOT about freedom.