No, actually God has been observed in near death experiences. But bozos like you ignore actual facts, while you embrace "universal nonsense" and Spinoza gods. I mean, what kind of foolish person throws out actual data?

Anyway, you should try harder to be a reasonable person.

well , I am still nice, make this for example to be more credible and formalise your idea , utilise the points or strings and after utilise the dimensions in begining in 1D and consider two E8 superimposed one for the quantum scale and one for the cosmological scale like cosmic strings and after you make E8XE8 , there maybe you could work correctly, utilise the lie derivatives and alg and groups and try the non commutativity also , and try to rank the topologies and geometries and consider the yang mills work with these photons oscillating , try also to converge with the superstrings and MTheory , but apparently I speak in the wind

John Cox:

There must be a world consensus on nuclear power, and that must include rational restraints, for the very simple and physical reason that for there to be nuclear technologies, there must be available a finite (and very rarified) amount of fissionable material.

Uranium and thorium are finite, actually very finite, and it is not wise to build more nukes due to this fact alone. The nuke industry tell you there are lots, and maybe in principal they are right, as instance sea water contains a small amount, but it is not economically possibkle to use that part (it would be better to use the fallout of Chernobyl and other accidents?). The impacts on environment becomes too much also. It is simply not true that nuke energy is CO2 neutral if we include this uranium enrichment in the chain. As long as we accept the nuke electricity as CO2 neutral we get no change?

One reason for the holding of nuke industry is also its waste, specially Plutonium, used for weapons. Plutonium storages are soon depleted now...

The waste lies in open basins now, and there are no plans to do otherwise. It is like a devastating trigger. To transmute it and burn it once more makes it even more dangerous. Maybe the plans are to use it for future weapons?

This shows very well the craziness in our global situation, I think.

Ulla.

There are no experiments to prove E8, superstrings, quantum loops or any of that many world interpretation nonsense. In contrast, by expanding graviton idea comes with an experiment.

Which theory is better?

stop with these things please like the near death experience, utilise the mathematical tools and stop to mix the religions also , we are on a sciences platform, not a religious one, make like all, differenciate the philosophy and the physics, and you shall be more credible , and stop also to beleive that you are right, nobody knows if we have a god or not and how the universe creates the topologies, geometries, make like all, try to be rational and concrete, is it too much to ask you ?

So you dodge my question about which theory comes with an experiment, and you choose to attack religion. You atheists are what's wrong with the physics community. You atheists are holding us back!!!

Arafat was a debated, charismatic leader. Israel would still invade their land, wouldn't they. Do you have more facts on this offer?

What about Yemen? It is urgent today.

Ulla.

oh my god, it is crazzy , you have a problem really, is it a hidden camera or what ??? make what I tell you and all will be better, work correctly please and stop to be a religious fanatic seeing atheists everywhere, you make the same than the extremist muslims, you are endoctrinated in fact, it is more than odd you know, and I am not an atheist furthermore, but I don t mix the physics and my philosophy even if I have my own philosophical ideas, make the same, stop to beleive in odd things, you are not connected wiith God and this thing has not given you a better qi and has not given you the answers, your real problem is there, your euphory spiritual

I am sorry but it is bubblelings, garbages, jon sense, I delete because there it is exagerated, I must take it away , I don t understand why I answer in fact in these conditions, you just want to disturb told me my friends

Nuclear power makes sense until fusion power becomes possible. Wind mills are hazards for birds. Solar panels don't generate enough energy. Fossil fuels will eventually have to be replaced with something better.

Steve,

You don't know any physics anyway, so discussing gravitons with you is not a good use of time.

Throwing out NDE data is foolish, but your ego can't accept that fact, so there you are.

To all, all the posts odd or not respecting the rules shall be deleted, we want concrete discussions with concrete solutions, not odd interpretations, we cannot accept the disturbing posts of total non sense, thanks for your understanding. So be rational , general and logic dear all , the freedom is essential if and only if the logic is there . We shall not accept also the personal attacks and the persons trying to create problems for this group , all are welcome if the rules are respected

    I have already explained it. See Agenda 30, UN. It is not my fault you babble too much nonsense here. Be proper. Ulla.

    John Cox.

    Another statement of yours: the last 50 years which has seen more than a doubling of world population. Given that number, one could expect to project an exponential increase in demand on resources but it has been much more due to the rapid industrialization of what during the Cold War were emerging mechanized states or third world stagnate economies which entailed half of the global population just 30 years ago.

    This is one reason why we need global collaboration. We cannot reasonably deny the so called third world to also want development of their economies, and wellbeing. But we must urgently find economic models that are sustainable so they don't give reason to so much problems and pollutions. This is one goal with the group.

    Is it a solution to expand into space, like Steve suggests with his wheel? Explore other planets? Or shall we try to accommodate our ecomomic systems to reality?

    This would at first place mean a stop of population increase. China and India have tried to do so, but now stopped. Are there some good ideas?

    Education of specially women are important here.

    Ulla.

    Guns are not the problem. The real problem is crazy people trying to implement crazy ideas that are unwanted by the majority of the people.

    if we had less of crazzy people wanting to impose their ideologies by the force and if we had less of persons unconscious on this earth, we could live in peace and we could live in a big village without fear and so without the necessity to buy a gun to protect our life and we d have less wars also, so the consciousness is the secret. But unfortunally it is not the case actually, too much unconscious people are on earth, the guns are a result of our global reality and our common history to all, the unconsciousness and the odd comportments have obliged the people to protect themselves and fight for their causes. These creations are human creations due to fear and due to our global problem and this unconsciousness, we have invented things maybe not universal like the money , the boders and the guns, probably these things when the global consciousness will be more evolved shall disappear. The planets are not to seöll and we are not created to make wars to aliens. Cooperation is a better solution.

    Encouraging freedom of religion and spirituality works wonders with helping people to adapt to their environment.

    we must respect all religions and be tolerant , the religions are human inventions and all countries have different cultures, heritages or others and nobody has the right to impose to others their ideologies, the only one truth is that the consciousness seems the secret and a religious educated becaomes aware of this universalism, so a jew, a muslim, a chirstiam, a taoist, a hindousit, a buddhist and others can eat at the same table and laugh together in sharing the humanism in respecting the foundamental laws, only the extremists and linmited minds imply problems, a sure thing nobody has the answer about this origin of our universe, so maybe the only one truth is this universalism and the love, the rest seems vain, the persons implying problems are not real universalists, they are persuaded that they are right and better than their fellowmen, they don t permit to reach this global consciousness, theyr prefer the problems instead of solution , they prefer to divide instead to unite unfortunally,. but a sure thing we are all brothers and from the same familly and all in the same boat

    freedom of cult and religion yes if and only if it is universal , rational and if they respect the others thinking differently, we cannot accept the extremism in the idologies, it is dangerous and not universal simply

    I will not report like inappropriate if it is logic and respectfull , let s respect the democracy and freedom if the universalism is there, not the others stupid posts, thanks for your understanding