Ntnghiep Thank you for sharing this. I can see some potentially interesting conceptual parallels with NVM, particularly the idea that different observable forms of energy may correspond to different dynamical regimes of a deeper underlying system instead of completely independent physical substances.
I am cautious, however, about directly incorporating the diagram into NVM at this stage. In my framework energy is not itself the fundamental medium. Rather, energy characterizes the states, gradients, and transformations of an underlying nonlinear physical medium. What we call particles would then correspond to persistent, dynamically stabilized organizations of that medium.
For that reason, I would first need to understand precisely how the quantities in your diagram are defined mathematically, especially “movement speed,” the rotational kinetic energy P, the kinetic/thermal gradient, and the boundaries separating cosmic dark energy from atomic energy. If those quantities can be expressed as dynamical variables or invariants then it may be possible to determine whether your diagram corresponds to particular regimes or attractors of the NVM dynamics.
So I would say there is an interesting conceptual compatibility worth investigating, but the important next step would be establishing the mathematical mapping without assuming that the two models describe the same underlying dynamics.
Best,
Mike
