Reconstructing Physics

Steve Dufourny

I have understood your approach, it is not necessary to repeat, tell us more , be frank, what codes these informations, do you believe in god or do you consider a mathematicaql accident , and for the higgs fields also, explain us how these informations take a mass, is it a field form this GR and how it acts ....

Steve Dufourny

It is important to define how they have a mass these informations and what are the pure essence physically speaking, without this, you have no mechanism . What are also the foundamental objects, if they are not spheres 3D, so they are points or strings, so develop and tell us more generally , don t turn around the pot to evitate my questions, aswer please philosophically and about the foundamental objets, the origin of these informations and the origin of their mass and after how they permit the QFT and QM with the properties, spin, mass,charges.....

Deleted_USER

""explain us how these informations take a mass""

The Meissner effect is one of the defining properties of superconductivity and its discovery established that the appearance of superconductivity is a phase transition.

Magnetic field lines are excluded from a superconductor when it is below its critical temperature.

This exclusion of the magnetic field is a manifestation of the superdiamagnetism that appeared during the phase transition from the conductor to the superconductor, for example by lowering the temperature below the critical temperature.

Meissner's superconductivity effect serves as an important paradigm for the mechanism for generating mass M

λ (M)= h/Mc

In fact, this analogy is an abelian example of the Higgs mechanism, which generates the electroweak masses W ± and Z to gauge particles in high energy physics.

Steve Dufourny

this we know you repeat things known, you have not answered about the foundamental objects and how the informations appear philosophically, from what we exist, do you consider god or a mathe3matical accident and why and do you consider that before this hypothetical BB it was an infinite heat for example and why, and after if it is this, how the photons if you consider only this GT=R have been coded , I need concrete philosophical developments, not things repeted fronm wickipedia, think by yourself, tell us , be frank about the philosophy of origin, for the nhiggs we need to know more about these mechanisms , fruthermore the missing mass is not explained with the higgs alone, so I repeat what are this general philosophy, be frank, what creates these informations

Steve Dufourny

The Meissner is just about phases in magnetic fields at critical temperatures giving a supraconductivity, nothing os special , it is just an effect at precises temperature and precise fields , it is just a transition nof phases, nothing of odd

Deleted_USER

""The Meissner is just about phases in magnetic fields at critical temperatures giving a supraconductivity, nothing os special , it is just an effect at precises temperature and precise fields , it is just a transition nof phases, nothing of odd ""

see better pls....

In fact, this analogy is an abelian example of the Higgs mechanism, which generates the electroweak masses W ± and Z to gauge particles in high energy physics.

The initial state is a kaotic state of informational equilibrium where the surplus of information at equilibrium is translated into order therefore energy, light and sound ....Mass this occurs following The Meissner effect (or Meissner-Ochsenfeld effect)

Steve Dufourny

It is like a perfect conductivity, and you copy simply whay you see on internet , I need concrete answers about the philosophy of origin , you have nnot answered , nor about the foundamental objects and the nature of these informations

Deleted_USER

"" you have nnot answered , nor about the foundamental objects and the nature of these informations""

se again pls,.....

information is a quantum state change is due the modification of one degree of freedom from the considered quantum system""

Steve Dufourny

furthermore the higgs mechanism needs to be better understood and these scalar fields massless and massive are for me essential and the supraconductivity abd the mass energy equivalence of einstein are not sufficient to explain the mass , the problem is really philosophical. The higgs bosons found have analogies withy the higgs mechanism and they have concluded in giving a nobel prize, but it was for me given too quickly, the higgs mechanism needs to have deeper logics and these massive scalar fields of this DM permit to solve , the same kind of reasoning can be made with the =axions for the missing mass of our standard model , the gluons are the key and it is not due to specific temperature and magnetic fields that this mass appear but from a non baryonic mass cause , it seems logic , it is there that my equation becomes relevant in considering these scalar massless fields of the DE and massive scalar fields of the DM conpleting the standsrd model and improving our undersatanding of the mass energy equivalence.

Steve Dufourny

you have not answered about the origin of the universe, tell me what we had before this hypothetical BB, what creates these informations and how, god or mathematical accident, strings and binary codes in the GR, but explain

Steve Dufourny

You see I have understood your idea with the temperature, the fields magnetic and the mechanism of mass energy equivalence correlated with the BHs , it is not complicated to encircle how you give a mass to these informations with the BHs and the temperatures critical and the supraconductivity , in fact you consider simply a transformations of the energy with specific gravitational fields and electromagnetic fields under specific relativistic gravitational topologies, and so you create the informations with the BHs, and after you conclude the mass energy information equivalence like a kind of higgs mechanism with the BHs to produce these informations, but all this is a n assumption, but well tries and thought generally

Steve Dufourny

but it lacks causes of these informations, where come form these fields electromagnetic and gravitational in this GR creating the mass of these informations, answer about a kind of god an infinite heat or a kind of infinite eternal consciousness or a mathematical accident from fractalised photons from an infinite heat and after an accident mathematical, but please explain the cause

Steve Dufourny

well, I have ideas for your model , that will permit to improve it . You consider the BHs and the GR, after the thermodynamics and the theories of gibs, von neuman and shannon, ok now that I have underatood where you create your mass and these informations, now you need philosophical causes with this GR if you don t consider my equations and these depper scalar fields. So I invite you to consider the works of strings, branes, and the extradiemnsions and the minkowski spacetime and you play with the DS CFT correspondanceand the fields and this thermodynamics in considering the vacuum of this GR like fluctuations and informations. You can consider the E8 and even 2 E8 and after you correlate with yang mills theory in playing with partitions of numbers with the reals, complex, imaginairies and padics analysis in trying to rank the fields and the temperatures and the mechanism for the appearing mass and after you correlate with the informations theories and entropies , but for this you need a main cosmic field in 1D or 0D for the philosophical acause and you must explain it and why. After you correlate with the waves functions collapses and the specif fields and temperatures for all this and after you rank all this in the standard model.

Deleted_USER

""well, I have ideas for your model , that will permit to improve it ""

i'm glad that i inspire you !!

But i encourage you to build your proper model...based on mathematics as mine

"DE like a fluid dynamical and energetical of pure informations massless antigravitational is relevant for me.""

each one his point of view,...

i respect you point of view of massless information and your sphere

but as yet mentioned sphere is structure and structure is yet information

Steve Dufourny

The origin of mass from this higgs mechanism is not complete and the supraconductivity and Meissner effect is just an analogy. It is due to this mass energy equivalalence of einstein and so with specific mechanism and fields and themrodymanics they tell that the mass appears like broken symmetries, but in fact this idea is not proved , the higgs mechanism is not proved, and the higgs bosons that they have found are probably just due to this cold dark matter encoded. They have considered that this vacuum of the GR and the supraconductivity and the works sof Landau was the cause of this mass in supraconductors with fields of the vacuum and after with the BEC and charged and after with the equation of schrodinger and the mass energy equivalence hop hocu pocus they tell that a mass appears due to a specific fiel in considering a specific frequence for the photon and hop this higgs appears giving the mass to the W and Z bosons, but in fact they have found a particles having a kind of similar property than the predictions of the higgs mechanism but nothing has been proved that it was the higgs mechanism , just that somethjing has given a mass to these bosons , it can be the sclar massive field of the DM.And it is there the enormous confusion about the mass energy from einstein and the higgs mechanism. It is my opinion , the sciences community with this GR and SR are in a philosophical prison . In fact the scalar massive field of spin 0 that they have found it is due to this cold dark matter simply encoded and not from the higgs mechanism, it is different.

Steve Dufourny

we shall see in the future with resulsts of experiments, we need to know more about all this, I wait the results about these massive scalar fields and massless scalar fields, that will permit to see clearer about the mass, the energy, the informations, the standard model. I believe strongly that the universe needs the 3 main systems to create the baryonic ordinary matter and that the GR and mass energy equivaloence of einstein have created a philosophical prison. The higgs is a scalar massive field yes but is not for me the higgs mechanism, it is there the difference, they have found particles giving a mass to the W and Z bosons, but they have not found the mechanism, the confusion is there for me. This CDM can be the cause of the massive scalar field . and I d say even that this CDM is the cause of all the mass of particles with specific mechanism under the scalar massless field of this DE like main chief orchestra.

For the 3D spheres, we shall see, maybe one day the poincare conjecture and experiments shall admist that the foundamental objects are these 3D spheres instead of these strings or points in the GR , I n all cases they ar not emergent these spheres but are the choice of God even for me philosophically

Deleted_USER

""we shall see in the future""

yet mathematics show the way

KV=tr (K ПЃV) в€' tr (K ПЃV0)=kc3ln(2)tevap)/16ПЂ^2GM=SV=S (ПЃVв"‚ПЃV0 )=S(ПЃV)- S(ПЃV0)=Tr (ПЃV(log (ПЃV)-log (ПЃV0)))=2ПЂkRE/в„Џc

Quantum Gravity Mathematical Description

Steve Dufourny

not these maths in all cases, the good general maths yes but not your mix, you must be less persuaded to have found a relevant thing you know, you have mixed some equations and generalised , is it a joke for the quantum gravitation lol , I discussed on linkedi n and fqcebook with concrete researchers about this quantum gravitation working with the E8 and yang mills and the geometrical algebras, if you show them this , they are going to laugh you know, the quantum weakest force is not renormalisable easily and since 50 years they try with different partitions to unify G c and h, the GR and the QM, they have not successed because simply the QG is probably simply a newtonian mechanic between massive particles and not with gravitons being quanta of gravitational waves, and you you come and tell this with these couplings it is total non sense my friend. Be more concrete and less persuaded and learn more .

Steve Dufourny

I can understand that you are fan of Dr Melvin Vobson and also Hawking, Landau and Bekenstein, but let s be serious please. The mass energy informations equivalence principle is a pure assumption not proved, and your quantum gravitation is not renormalised simply .

Deleted_USER

""The mass energy informations equivalence principle is a pure assumption not proved""

take perhaps a look into the "Experimental protocol for testing the mass-energy-information equivalence principle"" article from Vopson

https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0087175

« Previous Page Next Page »