• [deleted]

The root of evil in physics is Einstein's constant-speed-of-light falsehood. Physicists know that. Some start telling the truth sometimes but then stop halfway. Modern physics is based on the falsehood and would collapse without it. In this regard, telling the truth is suicidal:

Joao Magueijo, Niayesh Afshordi: "The whole of physics is predicated on the constancy of the speed of light...So we had to find ways to change the speed of light without wrecking the whole thing too much." https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/8q87gk/light-speed-slowed

Doppler effect in light (moving observer):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bg7O4rtlwEE

The speed of the light pulses as measured by the stationary observer is

c = df

where d is the distance between the pulses and f is the frequency measured by the stationary observer. The speed of the pulses as measured by the moving observer is

c'= df' > c

where f' > f is the frequency measured by the moving observer. Believing that c'=c is equivalent to believing that 2+2=5.

See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

  • [deleted]

Einstein's Original Nonsense

Waves: Frequency and speed vary proportionally for a moving observer.

Particles: Frequency and speed vary proportionally for a moving observer.

Light in Einstein's relativity: Frequency varies but speed gloriously remains constant for a moving observer.

Einstein wrestled with his conscience "over a lengthy period of time, to the point of despair" before introducing the nonsense:

John Stachel: "But this seems to be nonsense. How can it happen that the speed of light relative to an observer cannot be increased or decreased if that observer moves towards or away from a light beam? Einstein states that he wrestled with this problem over a lengthy period of time, to the point of despair." http://www.aip.org/history/exhibits/einstein/essay-einstein-relativity.htm

See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

  • [deleted]

"The Doppler effect is common to all wave phenomena, including light, sound and water waves. When a wave source is moving towards an observer, the source appears to be catching up with the waves as it emits them. They therefore tend to bunch up in front of the source and arrive at the observer with a higher frequency." https://people.physics.anu.edu.au/~cms130/TEE/site/tee/learning/doppler/doppler.html

Catching up means that the waves slow down relative to the moving wave source. Relative to a sufficiently fast moving source, the waves would be extremely slow. This is true for sound and water waves, but is it true for light? If not, why does the observer measure higher frequency when the light source is moving?

Answer: Because the speed of light varies with the speed of the source, as per Newton:

"Emission theory, also called emitter theory or ballistic theory of light, was a competing theory for the special theory of relativity, explaining the results of the Michelson-Morley experiment of 1887. [...] The name most often associated with emission theory is Isaac Newton. In his corpuscular theory Newton visualized light "corpuscles" being thrown off from hot bodies at a nominal speed of c with respect to the emitting object, and obeying the usual laws of Newtonian mechanics, and we then expect light to be moving towards us with a speed that is offset by the speed of the distant emitter (c ± v)." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emission_theory

See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

  • [deleted]

VARIABLE wavelength of light https://youtu.be/3mJTRXCMU6o?t=77 is another root of evil in modern physics. It violates the principle of relativity. If the wavelength varied with the speed of the emitter, as in the above video, the emitter would measure the variations inside his spaceship and so would know his speed without looking outside.

The formula

(frequency) = (speed of light)/(wavelength)

tolerates two axioms:

Axiom 1: The speed of light is constant.

Axiom 2: The wavelength of light is constant (for a given emitter).

Axiom 1 killed physics.

Axiom 2 will resurrect it (if it's not too late). Corollaries:

Corollary 1: Any frequency shift entails (is caused by) a proportional speed-of-light shift.

Corollary 2: If the emitter and the observer (receiver) travel towards each other with relative speed v, the speed of light as measured by the observer is c' = c+v, as per Newton's theory.

Corollary 3: Spacetime and gravitational waves (ripples in spacetime) don't exist. LIGO's "discoveries" are fake.

Corollary 4: Light falls in a gravitational field with the same acceleration as ordinary falling bodies - near Earth's surface the accelerations of falling photons is g = 9.8 m/s^2. Accordingly, there is no gravitational time dilation: Einstein's general relativity is absurd.

Corollary 5: The Hubble redshift is due to light slowing down as it travels through vacuum. The universe is not expanding.

See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

    • [deleted]

    Joao Magueijo's words below imply that, if the speed of light is variable (it is!), fundamental physics has been long dead - nowadays exists in a zombie state.

    Dead physics means dying civilization. Are you killing the civilization, theoretical physicists?

    "He opened by explaining how Einstein's theory of relativity is the foundation of every other theory in modern physics and that the assumption that the speed of light is constant is the foundation of that theory. Thus a constant speed of light is embedded in all of modern physics and to propose a varying speed of light (VSL) is worse than swearing! It is like proposing a language without vowels." http://www.thegreatdebate.org.uk/VSLRevPrnt.html

    "If there's one thing every schoolboy knows about Einstein and his theory of relativity, it is that the speed of light in vacuum is constant. No matter what the circumstances, light in vacuum travels at the same speed... The speed of light is the very keystone of physics, the seemingly sure foundation upon which every modern cosmological theory is built, the yardstick by which everything in the universe is measured. [...] The only aspect of the universe that didn't change was the speed of light. And ever since, the constancy of the speed of light has been woven into the very fabric of physics, into the way physics equations are written, even into the notation used. Nowadays, to "vary" the speed of light is not even a swear word: It is simply not present in the vocabulary of physics." https://www.amazon.com/Faster-Than-Speed-Light-Speculation/dp/0738205257

    See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

    There are two separate ideas to think about. First is the periodic motion of the electromagnetic radiation reflected or emitted into the environment. That depends on characteristics of the source such as material and temperature. The speed at which the EMr travels depends upon the medium. Secondly there is how the EMr is distributed in the environment, which can affect how/when it is intercepted. Point one concerns the EMr. the 'light itself' Point 2 concerns relation to the environment and observers, affecting the appearance of the light. 'Bunched up' waves intercepted will have the appearance of higher frequency. But the speed of the periodic EMr,'light ' is only effected by the nature of the environment. Not how it was distributed by the source nor what the observer does and sees.

    Joao Magueijo, Niayesh Afshordi, Stephon Alexander: "So we have broken fundamentally this Lorentz invariance which equates space and time [...] It's the other postulate of relativity, that of constancy of c, that has to give way..." https://youtu.be/kbHBBtsrU1g?t=1431

    "Lee [Smolin] and I discussed these paradoxes at great length for many months, starting in January 2001. We would meet in cafés in South Kensington or Holland Park to mull over the problem. THE ROOT OF ALL THE EVIL WAS CLEARLY SPECIAL RELATIVITY. All these paradoxes resulted from well known effects such as length contraction, time dilation, or E=mc², all basic predictions of special relativity. And all denied the possibility of establishing a well-defined border, common to all observers, capable of containing new quantum gravitational effects." Joao Magueijo, Faster Than the Speed of Light, p. 250 http://www.amazon.com/Faster-Than-Speed-Light-Speculation/dp/0738205257

    "You want to go back to a notion of space-time that preceded the 20th century, and it wants to ignore the essential lessons about space-time that the 20th century has taught us." Joao Magueijo: "Yes, that's right. So it's nouveau-Newtonian." At 53:31 here: http://pirsa.org/displayFlash.php?id=16060116

    So Joao Magueijo discovered that special relativity is "the root of all the evil", broke the Lorentz invariance, adopted the Newtonian space-time, and teaches...general relativity:

    https://www.imperial.ac.uk/people/j.magueijo/teaching.html

    See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

    Pentcho Valev

    6 months later

    hey to all,...

    Quantum field theory in curved spacetime (QFTCS) is a viable approximation of the theory of quantum gravity when spacetime curvature is not significant on the Planck scale.

    KV=tr (K ПЃV) в€' tr (K ПЃV0)=kc3ln(2)tevap)/16ПЂ2GM=SV=S (ПЃVв"‚ПЃV0 )=S(ПЃV)- S(ПЃV0)=Tr (ПЃV(log (ПЃV)-log (ПЃV0)))=2ПЂkRE/в„Џc

    The black holes entropic Information formula can calculate the entangled Hawking radiation down to the quantum system, describing black hole independently of the area law of the entropy of Bekenstein-Hawking. The black holes entropic information formula is equal to the universal bound originally found by Jacob Bekenstein. Which is equal by Casini's work to the difference between the expectation value of the modular Hamiltonian in the excited state and the vacuum state, itself equal to the Von Neumann entropy. The ultraviolet divergences can be avoided by taking differences between quantities computed in an excited state and the same quantities computed in the vacuum state; this must be put in relation to Ryu and Takayanagi conjecture, a general formula for the fine-grained entropy of quantum systems coupled to gravity

    Quantum Gravity Mathematical Description

      The problem of attraction between mass taken the informations in the theory of loop s for example and in considering gravitons at slow energies to unify G c and h , the GR and the QM with the works of belenstein and hawking and even Vobson don t renormalize this QG ,m simply because the QG is newtonian between massive particles and that the lamda CDM model is the key to unify this QM. So yes the problem is philosophical consider the nature of the universe in its primordila, primary essence , and the main problem is to consider this GR like the primary essence and even in considering a BB which is hypothetical like if God had only created photons and after points or strings in this spacetime where we try to quantize the space.The hamiltonians in this reasoning shall not solve the infinite quantities.It is mainly how they quantize the spacetime the problem to eliminate these quantities infinite , they want to create finite quantities and that is why at slow energies they consider these gravitons like the quanta of gravitational waves.The main problem is philosophical about how we consider the volumes and geometries and topologies and the main origin of the universe with this spacetime. In fact what do the thinkers is to create their own solutions for these infinite quantities that we cannot renormalise, and they invent partitions and models in changing the properties of the spacetime . The problem is that is we take this GR without modifying it , they cannot solvge the problem and it is I repeat a philosophjical choice, that does not mean that it is true.

      the degrees of freedom of even the fluctuations at this planck scale for the vacuum or others are not the problem, the philosophy of origin is the problem . The BHs and works of Hawking, the loop quantum gravity , the GR are referentials with speficic chosen laws and after they play different partitions to unify the GR and the QM for this QG. Now considering the informations and their lost or not , their mass or not are not the problem for this quantization of this QG, because if the QM is not due to this GR simply and that the QFT has a deeper logic, that implies that they trun in round in this philosophical prison. It is mainly how we interpret the philosophical origin of the nunivefrse, the spacetime and here in your case the informations. We arrive at a main problem of this GR considering the singularities and this quantum gravity,The problem is that the majority of thinkers try to modify postulates of this newtonian mechanics or this GR and in logic we cannot , that said the predictions philosophical can be harmonised with these deeper parameters to add at all scales, quantum and cosmological.

      To be frank , I don t understand how is it possible that the majority of thinkers since the works of Einstein are blocked like this in this GR and SR like if it was the only one truth for the universe, like if god or the universe had created only photons and this spacetime of the GR and that with the mass energy equivalence of einstein , god plays at guitar with the fields, oscillations, frequences of these photons and the energy to create geometrically and topologically the matters. It is like a philosophical prison I repeat this GR and SR, we observe this spacetime and we have concluded that it was the only one trut, how is it possible in fact . 100 years of GR adn SR and hop we are perauaded that it is just this.We have after this QFT and like the photons are encoded and they are absorbed or emiited, hop hocus pocus they conclude all that the EFE and QFT are correlated in a pure cause from this GR, it is totally odd for me because we know nnothing we just observe actually these phtons, that is all, we have even forgotten to return at this old school of motions of particles . This SR and mass energy equivalence of Einstein is not complete it is not possiblem the nergy and mass are not the same, and the confusion is due to fact that during a fission nuclear we loose a mass due to this CDM lost and in fact we loose photons giving a heat, that is all, but they have considered that the mass energy equivalence of einstein is the truth . I don t understand how is it possible for professionals in physics to be blocked like this in this philosophical prison with nthese strings now at this planck scale to give a structure to this spacetime at this planck scale , or points like in the loops or geometrodynamics, how is it possible that we have forgotten this old school of motions of particles in the fluidity, it is probably due to a philosophical problem. Einstein has created a prison for our minds and that continues, now it is like if it is not permitted even to go farer than this GR and SR , like if it was the truth that god with these strings inside the photons change the energy in matters like this with a field of this GR and specific frequences and energies to create the mass, it is anti rational you know dear all considering the determinism.These fields are just emergent from these motions oscillations of particles in this fluidity and the observable relativistic spacetime is not the only one truth, we need to consider the CDM, the DE and a new interpretation of these primary informations in this apcevacuum of the DE in considering particles in this fluidity, the informations have a cause due to this fluidity and particles of DE , it is even a pure proportional concrete explaination for our motions,rotations oscillations of these spherical volumes. The photons are just a fuel for this universe, they just permit to observe, they permit the heat and the electromagnetism, that is all , there is nothng of odd with these photons, why we have created this philosophical prison, I ask me if the humans are reasured in thinking like this about the field of god , I don t know but it is odd . The old school of motions of particles have been forgotten and if we had not this GR and SR , we had evolved with these motions of particles in the fluidity and we had the QFT also and we had photons but interpretated differently liek just particles encoded in this vaccuum of the DE, the real relevance is to return at this old school and forget a little this GR like cause of this QM you know, we shall create innovative roads and we shall discover new particles.These scalar massive and massless fields are essential to break this philosophical prison of this SR and GR.

      That is why these loop or strings, or others and the background independant scattering amplitudes are just a philosophical choice and these gravitons also are a philosophical choice and in the loop QG they have considered simply a different spacetime without in fact space ande time but in reconsidering its structure for the quantixations. But all this are assumptions and after having created their own referentials they derivate with their own chosen partitions the fields for the EFE and QFT, so they create their own choices to unify this QFT QM and GR simply , like a partition in a piano in chosing the mjusic, what I tell is that the pinao is not the good instrument and the music also is the good choice. The quantizations at slow energies, me I want well but where is the proof that these gravitons are the quanta of gravitational waves and are the bosons of this QG, it is just an assumption in considering still this GR like the cause of this QFT. So after they create bounderies and partitions for the amplitudes and steps of energies in considering finite systems to solve the problem of infinite quantities.The same problem philosophical is for the origin of these informations primary, it is a choice personal in this GR . The informations the same and the quantum gravity also in considering these independant background of the spacetime , they create tools to solve problems that they cannot solve in respecting newton and einstein, that is why the loop considers structures for this spacetime discrete correlated with the informations, the planck scale and the vacuum to solve with finite geometries at low energy the problem of infinite quantities. I don t understand what do the professionals in fact sometimes instead to think beyond the box of this GR.

      A strategy for addressing this problem has been suggested;[60] the idea is to study the boundary amplitude, namely a path integral over a finite space-time region, seen as a function of the boundary value of the field.[61][62] In conventional quantum field theory, this boundary amplitude is well-defined[63][64] and codes the physical information of the theory; it does so in quantum gravity as well, but in a fully background-independent manner.[65] A generally covariant definition of {displaystyle n}n-point functions can then be based on the idea that the distance between physical points -arguments of the {displaystyle n}n-point function is determined by the state of the gravitational field on the boundary of the spacetime region considered.

      Progress has been made in calculating background-independent scattering amplitudes this way with the use of spin foams. This is a way to extract physical information from the theory. Claims to have reproduced the correct behaviour for graviton scattering amplitudes and to have recovered classical gravity have been made. "We have calculated Newton's law starting from a world with no space and no time." - Carlo Rovelli.

      Me I want well, but all this is personal philosophical choices to evitate the postulates of einstein and Newton who are right in their referentials, and the problem is to try to unify G c and h like this with modifications added mainly in this spacetime of the GR to reach quantizations finite that they cannot colve with newton and Einstein. That is why they change the structures and interpret like they want the vacuum, the informations, the planck scale and the philosophical origin of the universe. In fact they want to unify the QG in unifying the classical mechanic, the newtonian gravitation,the QM, the QFT, the SR, the GR and the quantum field theory in curved spacetime but that does not solve because it lacks the deeper scalar fields to add and this mass energy equivalence is not complete and so implying a false general philosophy about the oriin of the ordinary matter and this reality and so the QG is not renormalisable simply and the planck unit and BHs shall not change the problem of renormalisation and quantization of this QG with its porblems of infinite quantities.So they can try with G tending to zero at slow energies withnthe special relativity with philsophical different personal choices , that has no meaning respecting newton and einstein simply. And for h it is the same tending to 0. so why they are blocked like this in this relativistic philosophical prison.Even the nmon commutativity and independant background shall not solve the problem because the problem is philosophical at this moment considering only this GR like primary essence of our QM....

      Write a Reply...