Speculation Regarding a Limited Role in the Universe for (Space-)Time by Jud Fink

Jud,

Your limited recent experience with math and standard theory physics may give you advantage in seeing things in a new light. Perhaps in your profession the forest is sometimes lost due to the convenient nearness of the trees and leaves; and justice goes begging after standard legal operating procedure. It does, at times, seem that Physics is stuck in the woods with a habit of wandering in circles.

Thanks for the kind words, Sherman. I don't have nearly the ego required to think my lack of important background gives me an advantage. Though I haven't seen anything in the simplified, metaphorical language that physicists use when writing for the general public that tells me my speculation is wrong (which is the reason I've submitted the essay, with some trepidation), if there is some kernel in what I've written that is helpful to people who do physics for a living, I would consider that a tremendous stroke of luck.

Dear Jud,

Sorry to respond so late to you free thoughts due to your limitations in Physics/Maths. In fact i enjoyed reading your brief presentation much. You have some unique ideas like non-quatum nature of gravity versus the other three known force fields , to account for the difficulty in unifying gravity with the common origin of all the fields, the Unified field.

Also, you talk of other dimensions than the four space /time dimensions, which are independent of both space and time. You postulate interesting manifestations of such extra dimensions. In fact, your imagination is correct, as Unified Theoriesn in Phyiscs, like the Super String and others do talk of higher dimensions if one has to explain the entire range of physical processes in a single theory. However, no such theory is yet successful.i for one, also believe that there has to be such a theory. i also don't like the separation between classical physics for the macro-world and quantum mechanics for the micro-world of atoms, nuclei and particles. Afetr all these are all constituents of the same matter!

You confirm my belief that persons who think independently of the existing knowledge fund are the ones who are most likely to bring innovation in any field of science, Physics most of all, being a fundamnetal science. Maths is a mere tool in Physics and the latter needs to work out detailed solutions of the problems . But precepts and concepts of Physics are based purely on observed facts and intuitive analysis of the same in depth by the human mind, including high degree of self-criticality. The latter along with logic lays the foundation of rationality needed to do science.

I commend your frank, nascent attempt in presenting your ideas fearlessly, what more can one hope for , if one is a conscientious person.

Thank you for your comments, Professor Nath. As I noted in my response to Sherman, I certainly don't claim any special insight based on "thinking independently of the existing knowledge fund." I frankly recognize my lack of background as a handicap, though I do hope the topics covered in my essay might stimulate productive thought from readers.